Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Insights into Deadlift Variations: Implications for Sports Science, Strength Training, and Rehabilitation
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The deadlift is a fundamental exercise in resistance training, essential for the development of overall strength and power. This review synthesizes current research on kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity during deadlifts, highlighting the effects of different variations and techniques on performance and muscle activation. Kinematic studies have revealed significant differences in joint angles and movement patterns between conventional and sumo deadlifts, emphasizing the importance of technique and experience in optimizing performance and reducing injury risk. EMG analysis has also revealed distinct muscle activation profiles for key muscles, such as the vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, and hamstrings, across different deadlift variations. These findings are critical for designing effective, individualized training programs in strength and conditioning, as well as developing targeted rehabilitation and injury prevention strategies in sports medicine. By understanding the biomechanical and neuromuscular dynamics of the deadlift, practitioners can improve performance, minimize injury risk, and tailor interventions to the specific needs of athletes. Thus, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of deadlift kinematics and EMG activity, offering valuable insights for optimizing training and rehabilitation protocols.
Abstract
The deadlift is a fundamental exercise in resistance training, essential for the development of overall strength and power. This review synthesizes current research on kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) activity during deadlifts, highlighting the effects of different variations and techniques on performance and muscle activation. Kinematic studies have revealed significant differences in joint angles and movement patterns between conventional and sumo deadlifts, emphasizing the importance of technique and experience in optimizing performance and reducing injury risk. EMG analysis has also revealed distinct muscle activation profiles for key muscles, such as the vastus lateralis, gluteus maximus, and hamstrings, across different deadlift variations. These findings are critical for designing effective, individualized training programs in strength and conditioning, as well as developing targeted rehabilitation and injury prevention strategies in sports medicine. By understanding the biomechanical and neuromuscular dynamics of the deadlift, practitioners can improve performance, minimize injury risk, and tailor interventions to the specific needs of athletes. Thus, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of deadlift kinematics and EMG activity, offering valuable insights for optimizing training and rehabilitation protocols.
참고문헌 (23)
- Nigrox F, "A comparison between the squat and the deadlift for lower body strength and power training", J HumKinet, 73(1), pp.145~152 (2020)
- Bird S, "Exploring the deadlift", Strength Cond J, 32(2), pp.46~51 (2010)
- Schellenberg F, "Towards evidence based strength training: a comparison of muscle forces during deadlifts, goodmornings and split squats", BMC Sports Sci Med. Rehabi, 9, pp.1~10 (2017)
- Kasovic J, "Kinematic differences between the front and back squat and conventional and sumo deadlift", J Strength Cond Res, 33(12), pp.3213~3219 (2019)
- Hales ME, "Kinematic analysis of the powerlifting style squat and the conventional deadlift during competition : is there a cross-over effect between lifts?", J Strength Cond Res, 23(9), pp.2574~2580 (2009)
- Brown EW, "Kinematics and kinetics of the dead lift in adolescent power lifters", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 17(5), pp.554~566 (1985)
- McGuigan MR, "Biomechanical analysis of the deadlift", J Strength Cond Res, 10(4), pp.250~255 (1996)
- Graham JF, "Exercise : deadlift", Strength Cond J, 22(5), pp.18~ (2000)
- Gentry M, "Strength training modalities : introducing the trap bar", Strength Cond J, 9(3), pp.54~56 (1987)
- Shepard G, "Bigger faster stronger" (2017), Human Kinetics
- Swinton PA, "A biomechanical analysis of straight and hexagonal barbell deadlifts using submaximal loads", J Strength Cond Res, 25(7), pp.2000~2009 (2011)
- Israetel MA, "Kinetic and kinematic differences between squats performed with and without elastic bands", J Strength Cond Res, 24(1), pp.190~194 (2010)
- Galpin AJ, "Acute effects of elastic bands on kinetic characteristics during the deadlift at moderate and heavy loads", J Strength Cond Res, 29(12), pp.3271~3278 (2015)
- Lawrence MA, "Effect of unstable loads on stabilizing muscles and bar motion during the bench press", J Strength Cond Res, 35, pp.120~126 (2021)
- Escamilla RF, "An electromyographic analysis of sumo and conventional style deadlifts", Med Sci Sports Exerc, 34(4), pp.682~688 (2002)
- Lee S, "An electromyographic and kinetic comparison of conventional and romanian deadlifts", J Eeerc Sci Fit, 16(3), pp.87~93 (2018)
- Bezerra ES, "Electromyographic activity of lower body muscles during the deadlift and still-legged deadlift", J Exerc Physiol Online, 16(3), pp.30~39 (2013)
- Ebben WP, "Hamstring activation during lower body resistance training exercises", Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 4(1), pp.84~96 (2009)
- Heelas T, "Muscle activation patterns during variable resistance deadlift training with and without elastic bands", J Strength Cond Res, 35(11), pp.3006~3011 (2021)
- Willardson JM, "Effect of surface stability on core muscle activity for dynamic resistance exercises", Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 4(1), pp.97~109 (2009)
- Chulvi-Medrano I, "Deadlift muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions", J Strength Cond Res, 24(10), pp.2723~2730 (2010)
- Fozia SS, "Core muscles electromyographic analysis in collegiate athlete on performing deadlift on different unstable surfaces", IJFMP, 12(2), pp.95~ (2019)
- Lawrence MA, "Effects of an unstable load on force and muscle activation during a parallel back squat", J Strength Cond Res, 29(10), pp.2949~2953 (2015)