본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

景德王·惠恭王代 官制改革의 성격에 관한 검토: 신라 중대 말기의 국내 상황과 대외 정세의 동향에 관련하여

Reorganization of the Government Offices Character by King Gyeongdeok(景德王) and King Hyegong(惠恭王): The Domestic Situation and External Situation at the end of middle-Silla period(中代)

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The reorganization of the government offices character of King Gyeongdeok(景德王) and King Hyegong(惠恭王) were examined in relation to the domestic situation and external situation in the end of middle-Silla period(中代). As a result, It was found that there is a limit to understanding the composition or character of the nobility during this period through the control reform of the end of middle-Silla period(中代). In other words, it is difficult to understand the Tang’s nomination and governmental reforms implemented in the King Gyeongdeok(景德王) period as ‘the tyranny of the kingship’. At the same time, It cannot be simplified as the nobility’s backlash against the ‘the tyranny of the kingship’. The reshuffle control reform needs to be considered from a more diverse perspective. In fact, the Gyeongdeok(景德王) period of the reshuffle, the Silla kingship of the King Hyegong(惠恭王) period was a period of trouble with frequent calamity. The outbreak of calamity also affected the actual policy. The Silla kingship would have been asked for a certain reshuffle of domestic politics. The resurgence of Nokeup(祿邑), for example, can be said to be a result of the government's renunciation of the previous system of receiving taxes, which was paid monthly salaries to bureaucrats. On the other hand, even when looking at the external situation, when the Tang 河朔三鎭 confronts, the Tang attempts to cut down the power of the 河朔三鎭 and fails. When the helplessness of the Tang was revealed both domestically and internationally, the status of the Tang was severely damaged. As a result, the Tang was unable to pay attention to the situation in Silla, and Silla was also able to focus on the domestic situation relatively. In other words, it was a relatively favorable time for Silla to organize symbolic political reforms such as governmental reactionism. Therefore, it is possible that the reorganization of the government offices character of the King Hyegong(惠恭王)dynasty was implemented at a time when the necessity of the domestic situation and the external situation were combined rather than simply a revolt from the nobility.

Abstract

The reorganization of the government offices character of King Gyeongdeok(景德王) and King Hyegong(惠恭王) were examined in relation to the domestic situation and external situation in the end of middle-Silla period(中代). As a result, It was found that there is a limit to understanding the composition or character of the nobility during this period through the control reform of the end of middle-Silla period(中代). In other words, it is difficult to understand the Tang’s nomination and governmental reforms implemented in the King Gyeongdeok(景德王) period as ‘the tyranny of the kingship’. At the same time, It cannot be simplified as the nobility’s backlash against the ‘the tyranny of the kingship’. The reshuffle control reform needs to be considered from a more diverse perspective. In fact, the Gyeongdeok(景德王) period of the reshuffle, the Silla kingship of the King Hyegong(惠恭王) period was a period of trouble with frequent calamity. The outbreak of calamity also affected the actual policy. The Silla kingship would have been asked for a certain reshuffle of domestic politics. The resurgence of Nokeup(祿邑), for example, can be said to be a result of the government's renunciation of the previous system of receiving taxes, which was paid monthly salaries to bureaucrats. On the other hand, even when looking at the external situation, when the Tang 河朔三鎭 confronts, the Tang attempts to cut down the power of the 河朔三鎭 and fails. When the helplessness of the Tang was revealed both domestically and internationally, the status of the Tang was severely damaged. As a result, the Tang was unable to pay attention to the situation in Silla, and Silla was also able to focus on the domestic situation relatively. In other words, it was a relatively favorable time for Silla to organize symbolic political reforms such as governmental reactionism. Therefore, it is possible that the reorganization of the government offices character of the King Hyegong(惠恭王)dynasty was implemented at a time when the necessity of the domestic situation and the external situation were combined rather than simply a revolt from the nobility.

참고문헌 (87)

  1. 北村秀人, "東アジアにおける日本古代史講座 7" (1982), 學生社
  2. "三國史記", ~
  3. 김철준, "韓國古代社會硏究" (1990), 서울대학교출판부
  4. 井上秀雄, "新羅史基礎研究", pp.457~ (1974), 東出版
  5. 이기백, "新羅政治社会史" (1974), 一潮閣
  6. 이영호, "統一新羅 政治史 硏究의 現況과 方向: 中代의 權力構造를 중심으로", 白山學報, 52 (1999)
  7. 김영하, "한국 고대사 연구의 새동향" (2007), 서경문화사
  8. 신형식, "統一新羅史硏究" (1990), 삼지원
  9. 이인철, "新羅政治制度史硏究" (1993), 一志社
  10. 이기백, "한국사상의 정치형태" (1993), 一潮閣
  11. "신라 전제정치의 崩壞過程", 학술원논문집 인문사회과학, 24 (1995)
  12. 李泳鎬, "新羅 中代의 政治와 權力構造", 박사, 한국사, pp.1996
  13. 이기백, "韓國古代政治社會史硏究" (1996), 一潮閣
  14. 이기동, "新羅社會史硏究" (1997), 一潮閣
  15. 이인철, "신라 정치경제사 연구" (2003), 一志社
  16. 하일식, "신라 집권 관료제 연구", pp.314~ (2006), 혜안
  17. 김수태, "新羅中代政治史硏究", pp.110~123 (1996), 一潮閣
  18. 濱田耕策, "新羅國史の研究: 東アジア史の視点から", pp.378~390 (2012), 吉川弘文館
  19. 木村誠, "古代朝鮮の國家と社會", pp.206~ (2004), 吉川弘文館
  20. 浜田耕策, "新羅の迎賓機構: 關門と領客府", 古代文化, 42(8), pp.45~ (1990)
  21. 전덕재, "『삼국사기』 직관지의 원전과 찬술에 대한 고찰 -중앙행정관부 기록을 중심으로-", 한국사연구, (183), pp.195~237 (2018), 한국사연구회[DOI]
  22. 남동신, "譯註 韓國古代金石文" (1992), 駕洛國史蹟開發硏究院
  23. 채상식, "新羅統一期 成典寺院의 구조와 기능", 釜山史學, 8, pp.97~98 (1984)
  24. 이영호, "新羅中代 王室寺院의 官寺的 性格", 韓國史硏究, 43, pp.83~ (1983)
  25. 武田幸男, "民族史의 展開와 그 文化 上", pp.84~87 (1990)
  26. 전덕재, "신라 왕경의 역사", pp.97~104 (2009), 새문사
  27. 三池賢一, "新羅内廷官制考 上", 朝鮮學報, 61, pp.39~ (1971)
  28. "舊唐書", ~
  29. "新唐書", ~
  30. 이기동, "신라 골품제사회와 화랑도", pp.125~126 (1984), 一潮閣
  31. 정구복, "역주 삼국사기 4 주석편(하)", pp.528~, 한국정신문화연구원
  32. 권덕영, "古代韓中外交史 遣唐使硏究", pp.138~139 (1997), 一潮閣
  33. 이재환, "新羅의 宦官 官府에 대한 試論 -洗宅(중사성)의 성격에 대한 재검토-", 木簡과 文字, (21), pp.207~226 (2018), 한국목간학회[DOI]
  34. 李在晥, "響き合う東アジア史", pp.78~ (2019), 東京大學出版會
  35. 김기흥, "신편 한국사 9, 통일신라" (2002), 국사편찬위원회
  36. 정덕기, "新羅 上ㆍ中代 中央行政制度 硏究", 博士, 史學科, pp.2019
  37. 박수정, "『삼국사기』 직관지 연구", 博士, pp.2016
  38. 최홍조, "新羅 哀莊王代의 政治改革과 그 性格", 한국고대사연구, (54), pp.301~366 (2009), 한국고대사학회
  39. 武田幸男, "新羅の骨品制社會", 歴史學研究, 299 (1965)
  40. 三池賢一, "新羅官制制度 上", 法政史學, 22 (1970)
  41. 최병헌, "한국사 3" (1978), 국사편찬위원회
  42. 이문기, "新羅時代의 兼職制", 大丘史學, 26 (1984)
  43. 이기동, "韓國史 11" (1996), 국사편찬위원회
  44. 이문기, "金廷鶴博士米壽紀念論叢 韓國古代史와 考古學" (2000), 학연문화사
  45. 최홍조, "新羅 哀莊王代의 政治變動과 金彦昇", 한국고대사연구, 34, pp.329~372 (2004), 한국고대사학회
  46. 채미하, "신라 국가제사와 왕권" (2008), 혜안
  47. 윤선태, "新羅의 寺院成典과 衿菏臣", 한국사연구, 108, pp.17~ (2000)
  48. 이재창, "三國史記 佛敎鈔存附註", 佛敎學報, 2, pp.317~ (1964)
  49. 한준수, "신라중대 율령정치사 연구", pp.203~ (2012), 서경문화사
  50. 박명호, "신라 중대 지배체제 연구", 박사, 한국사, pp.2010
  51. 白南雲, "朝鮮社會經濟史", pp.432~ (1933), 改造社
  52. 이경식, "孫寶基博士定年記念 韓國史學論叢", pp.152~161 (1988), 지식산업사
  53. 木村誠, "新羅の禄邑制と村落構造", 歴史學研究, (別冊特集) (1976)
  54. 전덕재, "新羅 祿邑制의 性格과 그 變動에 관한 연구", 歷史硏究, 1, pp.50~ (1992)
  55. 강진철, "韓國中世土地所有硏究" (1989), 一潮閣
  56. 吉田孝, "續日本古代史論集" (1972), 吉川弘文館
  57. 이기백, "韓國史新論", pp.91~92 (1967), 一潮閣
  58. 노태돈, "한국사 3" (1976), 국사편찬위원회
  59. 이희관, "新羅의 祿邑", 한국상고사학보, 3, pp.130~ (1999)
  60. 김기흥, "『신라 촌락문서』에 대한 신고찰", 韓國史硏究, 64, pp.29~ (1989)
  61. 조이옥, "統一新羅 景德王代 專制王權과 祿邑에 對한 再解釋", 동양고전연구, 1, pp.96~ (1993)
  62. 이재환, "新羅 眞骨 硏究", 博士, 國史學科, pp.2015
  63. 신정훈, "8세기 신라의 정치와 왕권", pp.55~56 (2010), 한국학술정보
  64. 전덕재, "新羅中代 對日外交의 推移와 眞骨貴族의 動向: 聖德王~惠恭王을 중심으로", 韓國史論, 37, pp.32~33 (1997)
  65. 이기봉, "신라 혜공왕대의 薦擧와 災異", 신라문화, 51, pp.149~170 (2018), 신라문화연구소[DOI]
  66. "續日本記", ~
  67. 井上秀雄, "三國史記 1", pp.316~ (1980), 平凡社
  68. 전덕재, "삼국사기 본기의 원전과 편찬", pp.160~ (2018), 주류성
  69. 조이옥, "統一新羅의 北方進出 硏究: 8세기를 中心으로", pp.143~144 (2001), 서경문화사
  70. 이현주, "신라 중대 冊封號 授受의 배경과 의미", 신라문화, 55, pp.153~179 (2020), 신라문화연구소[DOI]
  71. 조범환, "新羅 中代의 동아시아 政策과 對應", 신라사학보, (45), pp.199~231 (2019), 신라사학회
  72. 김한규, "7-8世紀 東아시아 世界秩序의 構造的 特性과 그 運營體制의 機能", 진단학보, 88, pp.399~402 (1999)
  73. 여호규, "6~8세기 동아시아 국제관계사 연구의 진전을 기대하며", 역사와 현실, 61, pp.19~30 (2000)
  74. 廣瀬憲雄, "東アジアの国際秩序と古代日本" (2011), 吉川弘文館
  75. 鈴木靖民, "古代日本の東アジア交流史" (2016), 勉誠出版
  76. 송기호, "渤海政治史硏究", pp.107~ (1993), 一潮閣
  77. 木本好信, "藤原仲麻呂政権の基礎的考察", pp.119~120 (1993), 髙科書店
  78. "高麗史", ~
  79. 菅沼愛語, "7世紀後半から8世紀の東部ユーラシアの国際情勢とその推移: 唐ㆍ吐蕃ㆍ突厥の外交関係を中心に", pp.274~279 (2013), 渓水社
  80. "冊府元龜", ~
  81. "資治通監", ~
  82. 辻正博, "唐朝の對藩鎮政策について: 河南「順地」化のプロセス", 東洋史研究, 46(2) (1987)
  83. 谷川道雄, "河朔三鎮における節度使權力の性格", 名古屋大學文學部研究論集, 74 (1978)
  84. 小宮秀陸, "新羅·渤海의 對唐蕃鎭交涉 연구", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2014
  85. 平澤加奈子, "八世紀後半の日羅関係: 宝亀10年新羅使を中心に", 白山史学, 42 (2006)
  86. 김선숙, "新羅 惠恭王代(765-780)의 國內外情勢와 對日外交", 한국학, 30(4), pp.3~29 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
  87. 新飼早樹子, "新羅国内情勢の動向と恵恭王代派遣の新羅使", コリア研究, 10 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)