본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Bavinck and Barth on Schleiermacher’s Doctrine of Revelation

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

헤르만 바빙크와 칼 바르트 모두 슐라이어마허의 계시론이 가진 주관주의적 경향이 가진 위험성을 인지하고 있었다. 바르트는 슐라이어마허가 계시의 근거를 주관적 인식과 신앙의 경험에 둠으로써 계시의 객관적 특성을 무시하고 있다고 비판하였다. 이러한 주관주의의 위험성을 피하기 위해서 바르트는 계시의 근거를 하나님의 말씀의 삼중적 형태에 두었다. 그에게 하나님의 말씀은 하나님이 주도권을 지닌 활동주의적이며 역동적인 방식으로 이뤄지는 드러냄의 사건이었다. 그러나 바르트 계시론이 가지는 바로 그런 특성에서 신자 주관의 역할이 너무 약화되어 버린다. 한편, 바빙크는 계시론이 가지는 객관과 주관의 문제를 철저하게 인식하면서도, 바르트와는 다르게 슐라이어마허의 계시론을 자신의 고유한 방식에 따라 전유하면서 그를 극복하고자 한다. 바빙크는 하나님의 말씀인 성경을 신학 작업의 객관적 기준으로 삼았으며, 교회를 기독교적 인식과 경험에 있어 중요한 형식으로서 인정하고 있다. 이처럼 바빙크는 슐라이어마허의 계시론이 가지는 장점을 취하되 단점을 자신의 교회론으로 극복함으로써 그것이 가진 주관주의의 위험성 역시 탈피하고자 한다. 비록 바빙크와 바르트 모두 슐라이어마허의 계시론이 가지는 단점을 극복하고자 했지만, 바빙크의 교회론적 계시론이 바르트의 활동주의적 계시 이해보다는 좀 더 효과적으로 그것을 극복하고 있다.

Abstract

Both Herman Bavinck and Karl Barth sensed the open question caused by the subjectivistic tendency of Schleiermacher’s doctrine of revelation. Barth argues that Schleiermacher ignores the objective feature of revelation by orienting the basis of revelation to the subjective consciousness and experience of the faith. To evade this subjectivism, he tries to put the foundation of revelation on the three forms of the Word of God, which are unveiled in an actualistic and dynamic way. By contrast, Bavinck, deeply concerned with the problem of objectivism and subjectivism in the doctrine of revelation, employs Schleiermacher’s doctrine of revelation in his own way, and regards the Bible as the objective standard for their theological work. Bavinck also stresses the importance of the church, which forms the Christian consciousness and experience. Although both Bavinck and Barth attempt to overcome the weakness of Schleiermacher’s doctrine of revelation, Bavinck’s ecclesiological doctrine of revelation overcomes it more effectively than Barth’s actualistic understanding of revelation.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 1, "Church Dogmatics, I", pp.1975, Barth, Karl
  2. 2, "Church Dogmatics, I", pp.1956, Barth, Karl
  3. Barth, Karl, "The Epistle to the Romans" (1933), Oxford University Press
  4. Barth, Karl, "Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum: Anselm’s Proof of the Existence of God in the Context of His Theological Scheme" (1960), SCM Press
  5. Barth, Karl, "The Theology of Schleiermacher: Lectures at Gottingen, Winter Semester of 1923-24" (1982), T. & T. Clark
  6. Bavinck, Herman, "Reformed Dogmatics" (2003), Baker Academic
  7. Bavinck, Herman, "The Philosophy of Revelation: the Stone Lectures for 1908-1909, Princeton Theological Seminary" (1909), Longmans, Green
  8. Schleiermacher, Friedrich, "The Christian Faith" (1928), T. & T. Clark
  9. Beintker, Michael, "Die Dialektik in der ‘dialektischen Theologie’ Karl Barths" (1987), Chr. Kaiser Verlag
  10. Belt, Henk van den, "Geloofszekerheid tussen objectief en subjectiefeen analyse van Herman Bavincks dogmatische positie", De zekerheid des geloofs (1901)
  11. Belt, Henk van den, "The Authority of Scripture in Reformed Theology: Truth and Trust" (2008), Brill
  12. Bolli, Heinz, ed, "Schleiermacher-Auswahl, mit einem Nachwort von Karl Barth" (1968), Siebenstern
  13. Bremmer, R. H, "Herman Bavinck als Dogmaticus" (1961), Kok
  14. Bremmer, R. H, "Herman Bavinck en zijn tijdgenoten" (1966), J. H. Kok
  15. Busch, Eberhard, "Karl Barth: His Life from Letters and Autobiographical Texts" (1976), SCM Press
  16. Calloway, Daniel K., "An Analysis of the Doctrine of Revelation with Emphasis on the Perspectives of Karl Barth and Paul Tillich", Brethren Life and Thought, 37(4), pp.237~251 (1992)
  17. Chandler, William Terrell, "General Revelation in Romans 1:18ff.: A Description of the Views of John Calvin and Karl Barth", Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Region of the Evangelical Theological Society (2002)
  18. Johnson, Gary L. W., "Reforming or Conforming?: Post-Conservative Evangelicals and the Emerging Church" (2008), Crossway Books
  19. Geelhoed, J. W., "Dr. Herman Bavinck" (1958), Oosterbaan & Le Cointre
  20. Harinck, G., "Ontmoetingen met Herman Bavinck" (2005), Uitgeverij De Vuurbaak
  21. Heideman, Eugene P., "The Relation of Revelation and Reason in E. Brunner and H. Bavinck" (1959), Van Gorcum
  22. Hepp, Valentine, "Dr. Herman Bavinck" (1921), W. ten Have
  23. Heppe, Heinrich, "Reformed Dogmatics Set Out and Illustrated from the Sources" (1950), Allen, & Unwin
  24. Hielema, Sydney Jacob, "Herman Bavinck's Eschatological Understanding of Redemption", Ph.D., pp.1998
  25. Hunsinger, George, "How to Read Karl Barth : The Shape of His Theology" (1991), Oxford University Press
  26. Keulen, D. van, "Bijbel en dogmatiekschriftbeschouwing en schriftgebruik in het dogmatisch werk van A. Kuyper, H. Bavinck en G.C. Berkouwer" (2003), Kok
  27. Kuyper, Abraham, "Encyclopedia of Sacred Theology : Its Principles" (1954), Eerdmans
  28. MacKinnon, John Y., "The Protestant Doctrine of Revelation, with Special References to the Writings of John Oman, Jacques Maritain, Karl Barth and Others" (1946), Ryerson Press
  29. McCormack, Bruce L., "Karl Barth’s Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology : Its Genesis and Development, 1909-1936" (1995), Clarendon
  30. Meijers, S., "Objectiviteit en existentialiteiteen onderzoek naar hun verhouding in de theologie van Herman Bavinck en in door hem beïnvloede concepties" (1979), Kok
  31. Oh, Sung Hyun, "Karl Barth und Friedrich Schleiermacher 1909-1930" (2005), Neukirchener
  32. Pannenberg, Wolfhart, "Systematic Theology. Vol. I" (1991), Eerdmans
  33. Parker, T. H. L., "Barth on Revelation", Scottish Journal of Theology, 13(4), pp.366~382 (1960)
  34. Rumscheidt, Martin, "Revelation and Theology : An Analysis of the Barth-Harnack Correspondence of 1923" (1972), University Press
  35. Ruschke, Werner M., "Entstehung und Ausfuhrung der Diastasentheologie in Karl Barth’s zweitem"Römerbrief" (1987), Neukirchener Verlag
  36. Spencer, Robert E., "A Comparative Examination of the Idea of Revelation in the Theology John Calvin and Karl Barth" (1964)
  37. Stahl, Steven P., "The Concept of Revelation in the Theology of Karl Barth", Saint Luke's Journal of Theology, 23(2), pp.116~132 (1980)
  38. Schwöbel, Christoph, "The Cambridge companion to Karl Barth" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  39. Thiemann, Ronald F., "Revelation and Theology : The Gospel as Narrated Promise" (1985), University of Notre Dame Press
  40. Thomas, George H., "Revelation, Faith, and Doctrine: A Study Based on the Theology of John Calvin, Friedrich Schleiermacher, and Karl Barth" (1961), Thomas
  41. Van Til, Cornelius, "Bavinck the Theologian" (1961), Baker Book House
  42. Veenhof, Jan, "Revelatie en Inspiratie : De Openbarings-en Schriftbeschouwing van Herman Bavinck in vergelijking met die der ethische theologie" (1968), Buijten & Schipperheijn
  43. Veenhof, Jan, "Nature and Grace in Herman Bavinck", Pro Rege, 34(4), pp.10~31 (2006)
  44. Waterink, Jan, "Herman Bavinck als man van wetenschap" (1954), s. n.
  45. Woo, B. Hoon, "Kierkegaard’s Influence on Karl Barth’s Early Theology", Journal of Christian Philosophy, 18, pp.197~245 (2014)
  46. 우병훈, "Karl Barth’s Doctrine of the Atonement and Universalism", 개혁논총, 32, pp.243~291 (2014), 개혁신학회
  47. Wood, Laurence W., "Defining the Modern Concept of Self-Revelation: Toward a Synthesis of Barth and Pannenberg", Asbury Theological Journal, 41(2), pp.85~105 (1986)
  48. Zahrnt, Heinz, "The Question of God: Protestant Theology in the Twentieth Century" (1969), Harcourt, Brace & World

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)