본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

온라인 플랫폼 시장과 경쟁법적 쟁점

Online Platform Markets and Competition Law Issues

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The industrial change that is closely linked with the fact that the online platform markets rises to the center of the industrial world is an advent of the web-based economy. The web-based economy came to the fore replacing the PC-based economy. To understand competition law issues in the online platform markets central to the industries in the web-based economy, it is helpful to review Microsoft competition law infringement cases which was a dominant player in the PC-based economy. Microsoft's conducts questionable from the competition law perspective can be summarized as attempts to deter or delay the emergence of the web-based economy replacing PC-based economy. With the advent of the web-based economy, the target of competition law concerns moves from PC-based economy to web-based economy, particularly the online platform markets central to the web-based markets. Competition law concerns in the online platform markets can be collected to the some focal points such as whether there exists any enterprise in the online platform markets corresponding to Microsoft and such player in the online platform markets is threatened by the emergence of any new economy market entry potentials, whether leading companies in the online platform markets have incentives and capacities to exclude competitors like what Microsoft had in the PC-based economy. Against this background, this article first provides implications for competition law approach to the environment changes in the online platform markets from the emergence of web-based economy to the settlement of smartphone mobile-based economy by explaining what happened on each phase of change and how enterprises responded in each phase(II). Then this article takes a look at competition law issues raised so far by reviewing major domestic competition law infringement cases in the online platform markets(III). Lastly, I suggest some research subjects for the way to go for competition law in response to the environment change in the online platform markets by which I would like to take a for continued study as for closing(IV).

Abstract

The industrial change that is closely linked with the fact that the online platform markets rises to the center of the industrial world is an advent of the web-based economy. The web-based economy came to the fore replacing the PC-based economy. To understand competition law issues in the online platform markets central to the industries in the web-based economy, it is helpful to review Microsoft competition law infringement cases which was a dominant player in the PC-based economy. Microsoft's conducts questionable from the competition law perspective can be summarized as attempts to deter or delay the emergence of the web-based economy replacing PC-based economy. With the advent of the web-based economy, the target of competition law concerns moves from PC-based economy to web-based economy, particularly the online platform markets central to the web-based markets. Competition law concerns in the online platform markets can be collected to the some focal points such as whether there exists any enterprise in the online platform markets corresponding to Microsoft and such player in the online platform markets is threatened by the emergence of any new economy market entry potentials, whether leading companies in the online platform markets have incentives and capacities to exclude competitors like what Microsoft had in the PC-based economy. Against this background, this article first provides implications for competition law approach to the environment changes in the online platform markets from the emergence of web-based economy to the settlement of smartphone mobile-based economy by explaining what happened on each phase of change and how enterprises responded in each phase(II). Then this article takes a look at competition law issues raised so far by reviewing major domestic competition law infringement cases in the online platform markets(III). Lastly, I suggest some research subjects for the way to go for competition law in response to the environment change in the online platform markets by which I would like to take a for continued study as for closing(IV).

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 인터넷포털산업의 특성과 경쟁정책적 시사점, 주요산업 경쟁정책보고서 시리즈, "공정거래위원회", ~ (2008)
  2. 검색의 중립성이 인터넷 생태계에 미치는 영향, "곽주원", 정보통신정책연구원, ~ (2013)
  3. 류한석, "플랫폼, 시장의 지배자" (2016), 코리아닷컴
  4. 방송․통신 융합 환경에서의 플랫폼 경쟁정책, "손상영", 정보통신정책연구원, ~ (2009)
  5. 손재권, "미래 비즈니스의 핵심 열쇠 앱스토어 경제학" (2010), 한스미디어
  6. 송정원, "해설 카르텔 및 불공정거래행위 규제" (2005), 박영사
  7. 플랫폼으로서의 인터넷포털의 경제적 이해: 인터넷포털에 대한 새로운 시각과 산업적 시사점, "이규정", 한국정보사회진흥원, ~ (2008)
  8. 인터넷 비즈니스 공정환경 제도개선 방안 연구, "이규정", 한국정보화진흥원, 방송통신위원회, ~ (2011)
  9. 정지훈, "거의 모든 IT의 역사" (2010), 메디치미디어
  10. 클라우스 슈밥, "4차 산업혁명의 충격" (2016), 흐름출판
  11. 황병선, "스마트 플랫폼 전략: 플랫폼 생태계 생존전략" (2012), 한빛미디어
  12. 곽주원, "검색 중립성에 대한 논의", 경쟁법연구, 28, pp.246~273 (2013), 한국경쟁법학회
  13. 강인규, "플랫폼의 경쟁이슈와 규제방안", 방송통신정책, 24(8) (2012)
  14. 강인규, "무선 플랫폼 개방에 따른 비통신사업자의 불공정행위: 애플을 중심으로", 방송통신정책, 23(10) (2011), 정보통신정책연구원
  15. 강정희, "빅데이터 기반의 디지털 경제와 경쟁법의 과제", 선진상사법률연구, (74), pp.81~111 (2016), 법무부
  16. 김윤정, "새로운 통신환경 하에서 플랫폼 중립성의 함의와 규제방법", 경제규제와 법, 6(1), pp.188~206 (2013), 법학연구소
  17. 김현수, "네이버의 시장지배적지위 남용 사건에 대한 검토- 서울고등법원 2009. 10. 8. 선고 2008누27102 판결을 중심으로 -", 경쟁법연구, 24, pp.102~146 (2011), 한국경쟁법학회
  18. 김현수, "양면시장에서의 시장획정 및 시장지배력 평가", 안암법학, (34), pp.759~790 (2011), 안암법학회
  19. 김현수, "인터넷 서비스 플랫폼과 경쟁정책 - 애플과 구글의 사례를 중심으로", 상사법연구, 32(2), pp.351~386 (2013), 한국상사법학회
  20. 윤성운, "ICT 기반 플랫폼 사업자에 대한 경쟁법 집행 해외사례", 2016년 한국경쟁법학회 하계학술대회 ‘혁신시장과 경쟁법’ 자료집 (2016)
  21. ICT 분야 플랫폼의 개념과 경쟁법적 함의에 관한 연구, In 2015년 법․경제분석그룹(LEG) 연구보고서, "이봉의", 한국공정거래조정원, ~ (2015)
  22. 이상승, "Google의 “검색 편향” 관련 FTC의 조사에 관한 법경제학적 분석", 산업조직연구, 22(4), pp.89~128 (2014), 한국산업조직학회
  23. 이상승, "구글의 검색엔진 및 모바일 운영체제 관련 경쟁법 이슈", 한국경쟁포럼 세미나 발표자료 (2015)
  24. 이영주, "스마트 미디어의 플랫폼 중립성 적용 가능성 검토: 안드로이드 OS 플랫폼의 구글 검색 애플리케이션 사전 탑재를 중심으로", 한국방송학보, 25(4), pp.213~248 (2011), 한국방송학회
  25. 전성훈, "양면시장에서의 경쟁정책", 경쟁저널, (168) (2014)
  26. 전성훈, "네이버-다음 동의의결(2014년)과 수직적 거래제한의 경쟁효과", 법경제학연구, 12(2), pp.177~206 (2015), 한국법경제학회
  27. 조성국, "인터넷 검색사업자의 경쟁법적 규제에 관한 연구 - 검색중립성 논의와 규제사례 및 그 시사점을 중심으로 -", 경쟁법연구, 31, pp.268~305 (2015), 한국경쟁법학회
  28. 주진열, "티브로드 사건에 대한 고찰: 시장지배력 전이 이론을 중심으로", 경쟁법연구, 25, pp.244~277 (2012), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
  29. 최요섭, "유럽에서의 망 중립성 및 검색 중립성 규제에 관한 연구: 유럽연합과 영국의 관련 규제, 사례 및 이론을 중심으로", EU연구, (37), pp.69~98 (2014), EU연구소
  30. 홍대식, "모바일 생태계에서의 플랫폼 중립성 확보를 위한 경쟁규제 방안", 방송통신연구, (81), pp.9~37 (2013), 한국방송학회
  31. 홍대식, "인터넷 플랫폼 시장에서의 경쟁법 적용을 위한 소비자 선택 기준", 경쟁법연구, 27, pp.257~290 (2013), 한국경쟁법학회
  32. 홍대식, "플랫폼 경제에 대한 경쟁법의 적용 - 온라인 플랫폼을 중심으로 -", 법경제학연구, 13(1), pp.89~118 (2016), 한국법경제학회
  33. 홍대식, "기술표준 관련 특허권의 행사와 한국 공정거래법의 적용 - 지식재산권 심사지침에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로 -", 고려법학, (63), pp.185~242 (2011), 법학연구원
  34. 독점규제법 위반행위에 있어서 주관적 요건의 검토, In 2013년 법․경제분석그룹(LEG) 연구보고서, "홍명수", 한국공정거래조정원, ~ (2013)
  35. Evans, David S., "Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms" (2016), Harvard Business Review Press
  36. Fransman, Martin, "The New ICT Ecosystem: Implications for Policy and Regulation" (2010), Cambrige University Press
  37. Gavil, Andrew, "The Microsoft Antitrust Cases" (2014), The MIT Press
  38. Nuechterlein, Jonathan E., "Digital Crossroads:Telecommunications Law and Policy in the Internet Age" (2013), MIT Press
  39. Page, William, "The Microsoft Case: Antitrust, High Technology, and Consumer Welfare" (2007), Chicago University Press
  40. Stucke, Maurice E., "Big Data and Competition Policy" (2016), Oxford University Press
  41. Farrell, Joseph, "Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age", Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 17(1) (2003)
  42. "Android Antitrust Investigation" (2014)[URL]
  43. Stan J. Liebowitz, "Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy", J. Econ. Persp, 8, pp.133~ (1994)
  44. "Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to Google on comparison shopping service; opens separate formal investigation on Android" (2015)[URL]
  45. "Public Consultation on Regulatory environment for platfo rms, online intermediaries, data and cloud computing and the collaborative eco nomy" (2015)[URL]
  46. "Full report on the results of the public consultation on th e Regulatory environment for Platforms, Online Intermediaries and the Collabo rative Economy" (2016)[URL]
  47. "Antitrust: Commission sends Statement of Objections to Google on Android operating system and applications" (2016)[URL]
  48. "Antitrust: Commission takes further steps in investigations alleging Google’s comparison shopping and advertising-relat ed practices breach EU rules" (2016)[URL]
  49. "Improving quality isn’t anti-competitive" (2015)[URL]
  50. "Improving quality isn’t anti-competitive, Part Ⅱ" (2016)[URL]
  51. "Android, Choice at every turn" (2016)[URL]
  52. "What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software" (2005)[URL]
  53. "The Internet Services Disruption" (2005)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)