본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 일본과 한국의 사회진화론과 아나키즘 연구 - 고토쿠 슈스이와 신채호를 중심으로 -

A Study on Social-Darwinism and Anarchism in Modern Korea and Japan - with Sin Chae-Ho and Kotoku Shusui as the central figure -

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The aim of this treatise is in researching Social-Darwinism and Anarchism shared between the intellectuals in both Modern Korea and Japan, with Sin Chae-Ho and Kotoku Shusui as the central figure. Fundamentally speaking, Social-Darwinism originated with Spencer who applied the law of the survival of the fittest of Darwin's theory of evolution to society. Kotoku Shusui, a representative Socialist in Japan, accepted and applied Darwin's concept of struggle and selection for existence to his society in early 20th century. He thought evolution of society could realize the ideal of Socialism. Differently, Shin Chae-Ho's concept is more like that of Kato Hiroyuki or Lyang- chi-chao, whose thought was based on organic conception of state, in aspect of his focus on nationalism or statism which was not accepted by Kotoku. When Social-Darwinism became the base theory for Japan Imperialism, Anti- Imperialism got formed in East Asia. Anarchism in Japan took shape on a full scale from Kotoku's 'Direct act' code in 1906. He was considered to notice desperately laborers' fall by necessity from industrial capital after Japan's Industrial Revolution followed by Russo-Japanese Wars. He insisted that the laborers should attain their rights and interests in the form of 'Direct Act', denying parliamentarism by a few elites after his visit in USA. Aanarcho-Syndicalism was originated from this and soon became the mainstream in Anarchism of Japan. On the contrary, in Korea, terrorism became the most important action in Anarchism. Shin Chae-Ho cried out for the people's revolution against Japan's imperialism without reference to his state or people in his 'Declaration for Cho-sun revolution' (1923). He also insisted on Korea's liberation and building ideal Cho-sun. He justified terror or violent revolution in the way of achieving people's revolution. In this aspect, it can be said that Shin was affected from Kotoku's concepts of 'Direct action', thought of assassination, or Social-revolution. But Shin was more radical Anarchist and the reason was Japan's violent occupation on Korea.

Abstract

The aim of this treatise is in researching Social-Darwinism and Anarchism shared between the intellectuals in both Modern Korea and Japan, with Sin Chae-Ho and Kotoku Shusui as the central figure. Fundamentally speaking, Social-Darwinism originated with Spencer who applied the law of the survival of the fittest of Darwin's theory of evolution to society. Kotoku Shusui, a representative Socialist in Japan, accepted and applied Darwin's concept of struggle and selection for existence to his society in early 20th century. He thought evolution of society could realize the ideal of Socialism. Differently, Shin Chae-Ho's concept is more like that of Kato Hiroyuki or Lyang- chi-chao, whose thought was based on organic conception of state, in aspect of his focus on nationalism or statism which was not accepted by Kotoku. When Social-Darwinism became the base theory for Japan Imperialism, Anti- Imperialism got formed in East Asia. Anarchism in Japan took shape on a full scale from Kotoku's 'Direct act' code in 1906. He was considered to notice desperately laborers' fall by necessity from industrial capital after Japan's Industrial Revolution followed by Russo-Japanese Wars. He insisted that the laborers should attain their rights and interests in the form of 'Direct Act', denying parliamentarism by a few elites after his visit in USA. Aanarcho-Syndicalism was originated from this and soon became the mainstream in Anarchism of Japan. On the contrary, in Korea, terrorism became the most important action in Anarchism. Shin Chae-Ho cried out for the people's revolution against Japan's imperialism without reference to his state or people in his 'Declaration for Cho-sun revolution' (1923). He also insisted on Korea's liberation and building ideal Cho-sun. He justified terror or violent revolution in the way of achieving people's revolution. In this aspect, it can be said that Shin was affected from Kotoku's concepts of 'Direct action', thought of assassination, or Social-revolution. But Shin was more radical Anarchist and the reason was Japan's violent occupation on Korea.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 고토쿠 슈스이, "幸德秋水全集" (1980), 메이지문고
  2. 신채호, "󰡔단재 신채호전집󰡕 전4권(개정판)" (1985), 형설출판사
  3. 신채호, "󰡔단재 신채호전집󰡕 하권(개정판)" (1995), 형설출판사
  4. 김갑수, "아나키즘의 윤리관과 전통 윤리관의 만남 및 변용", 시대와 철학, 18(1), pp.65~110 (2007), 한국철학사상연구회
  5. 金良浩, "申采浩의 “꿈하늘” 硏究", 어문연구, 19, pp.20~ (1991)
  6. 백지운, "韓-中-日 근대소설과 문학 이념의 문제 - 坪內消遙, 梁啓超, 신채호의 소설론을 중심으로", 중국현대문학, 16, pp.97~ (1999)
  7. 신연재, "구한말의 사회진화론 수용과 그 영향-신채호의 국가사상을 중심으로", 울산대학교 󰡔사회과학논집󰡕, 6(2), pp.147~ (1996)
  8. 윤 일, "明治三十年代に見られるイエス像─木下尚江と幸徳秋水の場合", COMPARATIO, 4, pp.25~27 (2000)
  9. 이호룡, , 역사학보, 177, pp.72~ (2000)
  10. 조세현, "동아시아 3국(한중일)에서크로포트킨 사상의 수용 - 相互扶助論을 중심으로 -", 중국사연구, 39(39), pp.231~273 (2005), 중국사학회
  11. 미와 료이치, "일본 경제사 근대와 현대", pp.101~ (2003), 보고사
  12. 박노자, "優勝우승 열패劣敗의 신화", pp.264~266 (2005), 한겨레신문사
  13. 박성진, "사회진화론과 식민지 사회사상" (2003), 선인
  14. 유길준, "서유견문", pp.326~ (1995), 한양출판
  15. 윤 일, "文学者における<思想>と<生活>の分裂", pp.72~79 (2006), 제이앤씨
  16. 이호룡, "한국의 아나키즘-사상편", pp.86~ (2002), 지식산업사
  17. 전복희, "사회진화론과 국가사상- 구한말을 중심으로", pp.20~ (1996), 한울 아카데미
  18. 조세현, "동아시아 아나키즘, 그 반역의 역사", pp.22~23 (2001), 책세상
  19. 최기영, "식민지 시기 민족지성과 문화운동", pp.182~ (2003), 한울아카데미

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)