부트스트랩과 베이지안 방법으로 추정한 수산자원관리에서의 생물학적 기준점의 신뢰구간
Application of Bootstrap and Bayesian Methods for Estimating Confidence Intervals on Biological Reference Points in Fisheries Management
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To evaluate uncertainty and risk in biological reference points, we applied a bootstrapping method and a Bayesian procedure to estimate the related confidence intervals. Here we provide an example of the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of turban shell, Batillus cornutus, estimated by the Schaefer and Fox models. Fitting the time series of catch and effort from 1968 to 2006 showed that the Fox model performs better than the Schaefer model. The estimated MSY and its bootstrap percentile confidence interval (CI) at α=0.05 were 1,680 (1,420-1,950) tons for the Fox model and 2,170 (1,860-2,500) tons for the Schaefer model. The CIs estimated by the Bayesian approach gave similar ranges: 1,710 (1,450-2,000) tons for the Fox model and 2,230 (1,760-2,930) tons for the Schaefer model. Because uncertainty in effort and catch data is believed to be greater for earlier years, we evaluated the influence of sequentially excluding old data points by varying the first year of the time series from 1968 to 1992 to run ‘backward’ bootstrap resampling. The results showed that the means and upper 2.5% confidence limit (CL) of MSY varied greatly depending on the first year chosen whereas the lower 2.5% CL was robust against the arbitrary selection of data, especially for the Schaefer model. We demonstrated that the bootstrap and Bayesian approach could be useful in precautionary fisheries management, and we advise that the lower 2.5% CL derived by the Fox model is robust and a better biological reference point for the turban shells of Jeju Island.
Abstract
To evaluate uncertainty and risk in biological reference points, we applied a bootstrapping method and a Bayesian procedure to estimate the related confidence intervals. Here we provide an example of the maximum sustainable yield (MSY) of turban shell, Batillus cornutus, estimated by the Schaefer and Fox models. Fitting the time series of catch and effort from 1968 to 2006 showed that the Fox model performs better than the Schaefer model. The estimated MSY and its bootstrap percentile confidence interval (CI) at α=0.05 were 1,680 (1,420-1,950) tons for the Fox model and 2,170 (1,860-2,500) tons for the Schaefer model. The CIs estimated by the Bayesian approach gave similar ranges: 1,710 (1,450-2,000) tons for the Fox model and 2,230 (1,760-2,930) tons for the Schaefer model. Because uncertainty in effort and catch data is believed to be greater for earlier years, we evaluated the influence of sequentially excluding old data points by varying the first year of the time series from 1968 to 1992 to run ‘backward’ bootstrap resampling. The results showed that the means and upper 2.5% confidence limit (CL) of MSY varied greatly depending on the first year chosen whereas the lower 2.5% CL was robust against the arbitrary selection of data, especially for the Schaefer model. We demonstrated that the bootstrap and Bayesian approach could be useful in precautionary fisheries management, and we advise that the lower 2.5% CL derived by the Fox model is robust and a better biological reference point for the turban shells of Jeju Island.
참고문헌 (15)
- Congdon,P, "Applied Bayesian Modelling" (2003), Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- FAO, "The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2006", pp.1~162 (2006), FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department
- Fogarty, M.J., "Fisheries risk assessment: sources of uncertainty", Environ. Sci. Technol, 26, pp.440~447 (1992)
- Harwood, J, "Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: lessons from fisheries", Trend. Ecol. Evol, 18, pp.617~622 (2003)
- Houde, E.D, "Marine protected areas: an old tool for new circumstances", Am. Fish. Soc. Symp, 42, pp.23~35 (2004)
- Hoyle, S.D, "Confidence intervals on catch estimates from a recreational fishing survey: a comparison of bootstrap methods", Fish. Manage. Ecol, 10, pp.97~108 (2003)
- 김도훈, "총허용어획량(TAC) 어업제도에 있어 할당 어획량 설정방식별 경제적 효과분석", 농업경제연구, 44(4), pp.165~182 (2003), 한국농업경제학회
- King, M, "Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management", pp.1~341 (1995), Fishing News Books, Oxford, UK
- Manly, B.F.J, "Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology", pp.1~455 (2006), CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA,
- "Statistic Database for Fisheries Pro- duction. Retrieved from"[URL]
- Stock assessment and fishery evaluation report of year 2008. TAC-based fisheries management in the adjacent Korean waters, "NFRDI", Report of Stock Assessment. National Fisheries Research and De- velopment Institute, Busan, Korea., ~ (2008)
- Pitchford, J.W., "Uncertainty and sustainability in fisheries and the benefit of marine protected areas", Ecol. Model, 207, pp.286~292 (2007)
- Punt, A.E, "Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach", Rev. Fish. Biol, 7, pp.35~63 (1997)
- SAS, "SAS", STAT User's Guide, 1989
- Zhang,C.I, "New Approaches in Fisheries Assess- ment and Management under the EEZ Regime", Proceedings on Prospects of Marine Environments and Marine Bioresources in the 21st Century, Yeung- nam University, Korea. (2000)