본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자원복원력 개념을 적용한 사전확률분포 및 상태공간 잉여생산 평가모델: 살오징어(Todarodes pacificus) 개체군 자원평가

A State-space Production Assessment Model with a Joint Prior Based on Population Resilience: Illustration with the Common Squid Todarodes pacificus Stock

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류수산학

초록

It is a difficult task to estimate parameters in even a simple stock assessment model such as a surplus production model, using only data about temporal catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) (or survey index) and fishery yields. Such difficulty is exacerbated when time-varying parameters are treated as random effects (aka state variables). To overcome the difficulty, previous studies incorporated somewhat subjective assumptions (e.g., B1=K) or informative priors of parameters. A key is how to build an objective joint prior of parameters, reducing subjectivity. Given the limited data on temporal CPUEs and fishery yields from 1999–2020 for common squid Todarodes pacificus, we built a joint prior of only two parameters, intrinsic growth rate (r) and carrying capacity (K), based on the resilience level of the population (Froese et al., 2017), and used a Bayesian state-space production assessment model. We used template model builder (TMB), a R package for implementing the assessment model, and estimating all parameters in the model. The predicted annual biomass was in the range of 0.76×106 to 4.06×106 MT, the estimated MSY was 0.13×106 MT, the estimated r was 0.24, and the estimated K was 2.10×106 MT.

Abstract

It is a difficult task to estimate parameters in even a simple stock assessment model such as a surplus production model, using only data about temporal catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) (or survey index) and fishery yields. Such difficulty is exacerbated when time-varying parameters are treated as random effects (aka state variables). To overcome the difficulty, previous studies incorporated somewhat subjective assumptions (e.g., B1=K) or informative priors of parameters. A key is how to build an objective joint prior of parameters, reducing subjectivity. Given the limited data on temporal CPUEs and fishery yields from 1999–2020 for common squid Todarodes pacificus, we built a joint prior of only two parameters, intrinsic growth rate (r) and carrying capacity (K), based on the resilience level of the population (Froese et al., 2017), and used a Bayesian state-space production assessment model. We used template model builder (TMB), a R package for implementing the assessment model, and estimating all parameters in the model. The predicted annual biomass was in the range of 0.76×106 to 4.06×106 MT, the estimated MSY was 0.13×106 MT, the estimated r was 0.24, and the estimated K was 2.10×106 MT.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Auger-Methe M, "State-space models’ dirty little secrets: even simple linear Gaussian models can have estimation problems", Sci Rep, 6, pp.26677~ (2016)[DOI]
  2. Brodziak J, "Development of Bayesian production models for assessing the North Pacific swordfish population", Fish Sci, 77, pp.23~34 (2011)[DOI]
  3. Carruthers TR, "Spatial surplus production modeling of Atlantic tunas and billfish", Ecol Appl, 21, pp.2734~2755 (2011)[DOI]
  4. "Estimation of life history key facts of fishes" (2000)[URL]
  5. Froese R, "Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience", Fish Fish, 18, pp.506~526 (2017)[DOI]
  6. Hilborn R, "Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: choice, dynamics and uncertainty" (2013), Springer Science and Business Media
  7. Jung Y, "Bayesian state-space production model for Korean chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus) stock", M. S., pp.2019
  8. "Statistical data-base fishery production survey"[URL]
  9. Kristensen K, "TMB: Automatic differentiation and laplace approximation", J Stat Softw, 70, pp.1~21 (2015)[DOI]
  10. Meyer R, "BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments", Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 56, pp.1078~1087 (1999)[DOI]
  11. Millar RB, "Non-linear state space modelling of fisheries biomass dynamics by using Metropolis-Hastings within-Gibbs sampling", J R Stat Soc C Appl Stat, 49, pp.327~342 (2000)[DOI]
  12. Musick JA, "Criteria to define extinction risk in marine fishes: The American fisheries society initiative", Fisheries, 24, pp.6~14 (1999)[DOI]
  13. Polacheck T, "Fitting surplus production models : comparing methods and measuring uncertainty", Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 50, pp.2597~2607 (1993)[DOI]
  14. Punt AE, "Extending production models to include process error in the population dynamics", Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 60, pp.1217~1228 (2003)[DOI]
  15. Punt AE, "Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach", Rev Fish Biol Fish, 7, pp.35~63 (1997)[DOI]
  16. 심성현, "TAC 어종의 어획량 분석을 통한 TAC 제도의 효과 분석", Ocean and Polar Research, 42(2), pp.157~169 (2020), 한국해양과학기술원[DOI]
  17. Zeller D, "What about recreational catch?: Potential impact on stock assessment for Hawaii's bottomfish fisheries", Fish Res, 91, pp.88~97 (2008)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)