본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사회적 시간의식 차이가 한영 동시통역에 미치는 영향 연구—동사 시제 오류 중심으로

How Different Time Perception between English and Korean Affects K-to-E Simultaneous Interpretation—Focusing on Tense Errors

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Time is seen from a completely different perspective by Korean and English speakers. For Korean speakers, time is cyclic. It does not disappear into the past. Rather, time comes around again and again in a circle. In their perception, they can move rather freely across time and space. Thus past tense is often mixed with future tense, as though the speaker were able to teleport her/himself from the past immediately to the future (e.g. If you do not come here tomorrow, you must have been dead.). For English speakers, however, time runs in a linear manner, segmented by strict rules. The tenses are not mixed, and observing these rules sequentially gives texts logic and coherence. This paper aims to investigate how different perception of time affects the interpretation process during Korean to English simultaneous interpretation. For the investigation, the files of K-to-E simultaneous interpretation by 2 Korean graduate students and 2 foreign graduate students(1 American, 1 British) were transcribed and analyzed for tense errors. According to the results of the investigation, both groups(Korean and Foreign) made a similar number of tense errors. The types of their errors, however, were totally different. Foreign students made tense errors because they could not follow the mixture of tense in a sentence or in a paragraph, characteristic of cyclic time perception. In the meantime, Korean students tended to fail to use accurate tense forms. They sometimes fail to maintain tense consistency in a paragraph, reflecting their time perception. The conclusion of this study is that tense errors made by students should be approached not only from a linguistic perspective but also from a cultural perspective, and lessons should be conducted to reflect this reality.

Abstract

Time is seen from a completely different perspective by Korean and English speakers. For Korean speakers, time is cyclic. It does not disappear into the past. Rather, time comes around again and again in a circle. In their perception, they can move rather freely across time and space. Thus past tense is often mixed with future tense, as though the speaker were able to teleport her/himself from the past immediately to the future (e.g. If you do not come here tomorrow, you must have been dead.). For English speakers, however, time runs in a linear manner, segmented by strict rules. The tenses are not mixed, and observing these rules sequentially gives texts logic and coherence. This paper aims to investigate how different perception of time affects the interpretation process during Korean to English simultaneous interpretation. For the investigation, the files of K-to-E simultaneous interpretation by 2 Korean graduate students and 2 foreign graduate students(1 American, 1 British) were transcribed and analyzed for tense errors. According to the results of the investigation, both groups(Korean and Foreign) made a similar number of tense errors. The types of their errors, however, were totally different. Foreign students made tense errors because they could not follow the mixture of tense in a sentence or in a paragraph, characteristic of cyclic time perception. In the meantime, Korean students tended to fail to use accurate tense forms. They sometimes fail to maintain tense consistency in a paragraph, reflecting their time perception. The conclusion of this study is that tense errors made by students should be approached not only from a linguistic perspective but also from a cultural perspective, and lessons should be conducted to reflect this reality.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김기찬, "영어와 한국어의 기본 색채어의 비교 분석", 언어과학연구, 18, pp.21~48 (2000)
  2. 김대웅, "이상 시의 시간의식 연구 - 이상한 가역반응 을 중심으로-", 어문학, (133), pp.305~329 (2016), 한국어문학회
  3. 김정숙, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법I" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
  4. 김정우, "영어를 우리말처럼, 우리말을 영어처럼" (1996), 창문사
  5. 김정우, "한국어 문법과 시점(視點)", 인문논총, 52, pp.125~168 (2020), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
  6. 목정수, "한국어, 문법 그리고 사유" (2009), 태학사
  7. 박종석, "지구촌 비즈니스 문화" (2001), FKI미디어
  8. 설옥순, "'시간 표현'에 대한 영한 번역 연구 : 비등가 원인과 등가 전략을 중심으로", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.2009
  9. 송창선, "국어 문법론" (2020), ㈜박이정
  10. 신필여, "한국어 학습자 담화의 시제 사용 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2017
  11. 원종화, "한-영 동시통역 시 정보 처리의 방향성 연구: 은유 처리 양상을 중심으로", 박사, 통번역학, pp.2010
  12. 원종화, "독자 반응을 통한 한·영 간 색채의식 차이 연구 — 한강의 『채식주의자』와 그 영역본 중심으로 —", 번역학연구, 18(5), pp.111~141 (2017), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  13. 이상돈, "시간은 어떻게 인간을 지배하는가" (2000), 황금가지
  14. 이소희, "한영 동시통역에서 분절 및 전환전략의 활용 -명사구의 동사화 사례분석을 통한 고찰", 통역과 번역, 16(2), pp.111~129 (2014), 한국통역번역학회
  15. 이승재, "문화층위와 문화소: 번역에 대한 문화적 접근", 번역학연구, 13(1), pp.137~166 (2012), 한국번역학회[DOI]
  16. 이재원, "드 보그랑데", 드레슬러(1981)의 텍스트성에 대한 비판적 고찰, 2001, pp.11, 279~302
  17. 이정모, "인지 심리학" (2003), 학지사
  18. 이주행, "한국어 문법의 이해" (2000), 월인
  19. 정수복, "한국인의 문화적 문법: 당연의 세계 낯설게 보기" (2007), 생각의 나무
  20. 정창준, "문화간 차이와 국제광고 표현전략: 표준화", 현지화 전략, 사회과학논총, pp.1999, 20[DOI]
  21. 최혜선, "문화를 넘어서" (2000), 한길사
  22. Aarts, Bas, "Oxford Modern English Grammar" (2011), Oxford UP
  23. EFL Teacher’s Course, "The Grammar Book: An ESL", pp.1999, Celce-Murcia Marianne
  24. Gile, Daniel, "Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training" (1995), John Benjamins
  25. Hall, Edward T., "The Silent Language" (1973), Anchor Books
  26. Trompenaars, Fons, "Riding the Waves of Culture" (1993), The Economist Books
  27. "How Different Cultures Understand Time" (2014)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)