Explaining the Role of Motivation in Opposition to Nuclear Power Energy - Focusing on EIV (Expectancy, Instrumentality, and Valence) in Expectancy Theory

키워드

참고문헌 (33)

1. Alhakami, A. S., "A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit", Risk Analysis, 14, pp.1085~1096 (1994)
2. Brown, J. M., "The Public’s Understanding of Radiation and Nuclear Waste", Journal of the Society of Radiological Protection, 7(2), pp.61~70 (1987)
3. Corner, A., "Nuclear Power, Climate Change and Energy Security: Exploring British Public Attitudes", Energy Policy, 39(9), pp.4823~4833 (2011)
4. Fischhoff, B., "How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits", Policy Science, 9(2), pp.127~152 (1978)
5. Greenberg, M., "Energy Sources, Public Policy, and Public Preferences: Analysis of US National and Site-Specific Data", Energy Policy, 37(8), pp.3242~3249 (2009)
6. Guo, Yue, "When It is Unfamiliar to Me: Local Acceptance of Planned Nuclear Power Plants in China in the Post-Fukushima Era", Energy Policy, 100, pp.113~125 (2017)
7. He, G., "Public Participation and Trust in Nuclear Power Development in China", Renewable Sustainable Energy Review, 23, pp.1~11 (2013)
8. Huang, L., "Effect of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident on the Risk Perception of Residents near a Nuclear Power Plant in China", Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(49), pp.19742~19747 (2013)
9. Katsuya, T., "Public Response to the Tokai Nuclear Accident", Risk Analysis, 21(6), pp.1039~1046 (2001)
10. Kuklinski, J. H., "Citizen Knowledge and Choices on the Complex Issue of Nuclear Energy", American Journal of Political Science, 26(4), pp.615~642 (1982)
11. Lewin, K., "Contributions to Psychological Theory. The Conceptual Representation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces" (1938), Duke University Press
12. Lunenburg, Fred C., "Expectancy Theory of Motivation:Motivating by Altering Expectations", International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15(1), pp.24~48 (2011)
13. Marris, C., "Exploring the “Psychometric Paradigm”: Comparisons between Aggregate and Individual Analyses", Risk Analysis, 17, pp.303~312 (1997)
14. McDaniels, T. L., "Chernobyl’s Effects on the Perceived Risks of Nuclear Power : A Small Sample Test", Risk Analysis, 8(3), pp.457~461 (1988)
15. Peters, E., "The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(16), pp.1427~1453 (1996)
16. Siegrist, M., "Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication", pp.600~601 (2010)
17. Siegrist, M., "Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge", Risk Analysis, 20(5), pp.713~720 (2000)
18. Siegrist, M., "A New Look at the Psychometric Paradigm of Perception of Hazards", Risk Analysis, 25(1), pp.211~222 (2005)
19. Siegrist, M., "A New Look at the Psychometric Paradigm of Perception of Hazards", Risk Analysis, 25(1), pp.211~222 (2005)
20. Siegrist, M., "Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk", Benefit Perception, 2000, pp.20(3), 353~362
21. Siegrist, M., "Perception of Risk: the Influence of General Trust, and General Confidence", Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), pp.145~156 (2005)
22. Myths of The Psychometric Paradigm and How They Can Misinform Risk Communication, "Sjöberg, L.", SSE, 2006, pp.1~19, SSE[DOI]
23. Sjöberg, L., "Knowledge and Risk Perception among Nuclear Power Plant Employees", Risk Analysis, 11(4), pp.607~618 (1991)
24. Slovic, P., "The Perception of Risk" (2016), Earthscan
25. Slovic, P., "Perceived Risk, Stigma, and Potential Economic Impacts of a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada", Risk Analysis, 11(4), pp.683~696 (1991)
26. Stoutenborough, J. W., "Knowledge, Risk, and Policy Support: Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power", Energy Policy, 62, pp.176~184 (2013)
27. Sun, C., "Evaluating the Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power in China: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey", Energy Policy, 69, pp.397~405 (2014)
28. Tolman, E. C., "Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men" (1932), Century
29. Tsujikawa, N., "Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster", Risk Analysis, 36(1), pp.98~113 (2016)
30. Visschers, V. H., "How a Nuclear Power Plant Accident Influences Acceptance of Nuclear Power:Results of a Longitudinal Study before and After the Fukushima Disaster", Risk Analysis, 33(2), pp.333~347 (2013)
31. Vroom, V. H., "Work and Motivation" (1964), Wiley
32. Whitfield, S. C., "The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception", Risk Analysis, 29(3), pp.425~437 (2009)
33. Yang, S., "Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Risk Perception among Students at a University in South Korea", American Journal of Infection Control, 45(6), pp.53~60 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천