MAJOR OBJECTS: ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN A KRATZERIAN DECOMPOSITION OF THE VP
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the properties of the Major Subject (Yoon 2004a, 2004b, 2004c) and the Major Object (the IP-internal correlate of the Major Subject) in Korean and argues that the existence of both Major Subjects and Major Objects, which are respectively licensed by differing predicate elements, shows strong support in favor of the Kratzerian decomposition of the VP. The existence of both Major Subjects and Major Objects in Korean is a natural consequence of the Kratzerian decomposition of the VP into two predications and the conjecture that the licensing of phrasal arguments that are not lexically selected is possible, providing robust evidence for Kratzer’s (1996) analysis as well as the construction approach to argument structure (Heycock 1993, Goldberg 1995/ 1997, and Borer 1994/2003).
Abstract
This paper examines the properties of the Major Subject (Yoon 2004a, 2004b, 2004c) and the Major Object (the IP-internal correlate of the Major Subject) in Korean and argues that the existence of both Major Subjects and Major Objects, which are respectively licensed by differing predicate elements, shows strong support in favor of the Kratzerian decomposition of the VP. The existence of both Major Subjects and Major Objects in Korean is a natural consequence of the Kratzerian decomposition of the VP into two predications and the conjecture that the licensing of phrasal arguments that are not lexically selected is possible, providing robust evidence for Kratzer’s (1996) analysis as well as the construction approach to argument structure (Heycock 1993, Goldberg 1995/ 1997, and Borer 1994/2003).
참고문헌 (17)
- Basilico,D, "Object Position and Predication Forms", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, pp.541~595 (1998)
- Doron, E, "Filling and Licensing Multiple Specifiers, in Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches", 69~89 (1999)
- Heycock,C, "Syntactic predication in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, pp.167~211 (1993)
- Kratzer,A, "Severing the External Argument from its Verb. In: Phrase Structure and the Lexicon,", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Kuno,S, "The Structure of the Japanese Language" (1973), MIT Press
- Kuno,S, "Theoretical Perspectives on Japanese Linguistics. In: Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics", pp.213~285 (1978), Kaitakusha
- Kuroda,S-Y, "Case-marking, Canonical Sentence Patterns, and Counter Equi in Japanese. In: Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics", pp.31~51 (1978), Kaitakusha
- Marantz,A, "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), MIT Press
- Maling, J, "Case Assignment in the Inalienable Possession Construction in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1(1), pp.37~68 (1992)
- Rothstein,S, "The Syntactic Forms of Predication", 박사, pp.1983
- Shibatani,M, "Dative Subject Constructions Twenty-Two Years Later", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), pp.45~76 (1999), Forum Lectures from the 1999 Linguistic Institute
- Sim,C-Y, "Two Types of Multiple Accusative Constructions in Korean -Inalienable Possession Type and Set-Relation Type-", Proceedings of NELS, 34, pp.541~553 (2003)
- Yoon,J H-S, "The Grammar of Inalienable Possession Constructions in Korean, Mandarin and French", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 111, pp.357~368 (1989)
- Yoon,J H-S, "The Independence of Grammatical Case from Interpretive Factors", paper presented at the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korea International Conference (2004)
- Yoon, J H-S, "Lecture notes from ‘Seminar in Japanese", Korean Linguistics’ at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004
- Yoon,J H-S, "Non-nominative (major) subjects and case-stacking in Korean. In: Non-nominative Subjects, vol. 2", pp.265~314 (2004), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Yoon,J-M, "The Argument Structure of Relational Nouns and Inalienable Possessor Constructions in Korean", Language Research, 33(2), pp.231~264 (1997)