FTA시대에 경영분야의 대응에 관한 메타분석: 2000년~2016년 연구논문을 대상으로

Abstract

This study conducts meta-analysis of domestic articles in academic papers, except for articles presented at symposiums from 2000 up to date, in order to find out research performances on correspondence to management areas in the era of FTAs. It focuses on professionalism, industrial fields, research methods and countries by major field of study in business administration on correspondence to business fields in the age of FTAs. The results are as follows: First of all, studies on FTAs by business administration major are insufficient. Secondly, newly glowing industries such as the intellectual property, content, design and robot industries, and specialized services such as the education, financial and tourism industries, actively respond to FTAs, while existing infrastructure industries including the manufacturing, distribution, logistics and construction industries insufficiently respond to FTAs. In addition, studies tend to be biased towards agriculture and fisheries, which makes industrial imbalance of studies on FTA management deepen and interests in non-management fields increase. Thirdly, various analysis methods should be adopted in the future by qualitative research that focuses on exploratory research and quantitative research that is still not enough, and it is expected that quantitative research will be active as data are accumulated. Lastly, regions of research have been biased towards the U.S. and China, so it is necessary to conduct research not only on FTA signatories, but also on countries, likely to conclude FTAs, in the level of business administration in the future. In conclusion, an approach by general management is necessary, and specialized research by management field should be conducted for easy approaches and adoption as there are limitations for FTA-managerial approaches in comprehensive industrial fields and non-business fields.