經典解釋과 漢語文字學(2) －≪懸吐完譯 孟子集註≫를 중심으로－

Abstract

Interpreting a Gyeongjeon(經典) needs a application of Haneomunjahak (漢語文字學). when interpreting a Gyeongjeon(經典), you should consider how to applicate Uihang(義項) which is presented on dictionary of classical Chinese. ≪Hyeontowanyeok Maengjajipju(懸吐完譯 孟子集註)≫ interpreted ‘Woo’(又) as ‘again’, ‘Chuk’(縮) as ‘straight’. However, They are more appropriate to be interpreted as ‘more’, ‘vertical’ each. Jajeon(字典) of China(中國) states Icheja(異體字) as Dongmo(同某), Tongaja(通假字) as ‘Tongmo(通謀).’ ‘Dongmo(同某) and ‘Tongmo(通謀)’ are also shown in ≪Hyeontowanyeok Maengjajipju(懸吐完譯 孟子集註)≫ by Baek Seonghyo(百成曉), but he didn’t seem to present Icheja(異體字) and Tonggaja(通假字). As of now, there is no way to know a standard that separated ‘Dong mo(同某)’ and ‘通ongmo(通謀).’ ≪Hyeontowanyeok Maengjajipju(懸吐完 譯 孟子集註)≫ presented Dogeum(讀音) of sim(甚) as ‘hemp’, but the right meaning was ‘심(sim).’ You should Gacha(假借) because it represents ‘sib(什)’ of ‘Sibyo(什么)’ and ‘Jeum(怎)’ of ‘Jeumyo(Wisibyo) 怎么(爲什 么),’ sib(什) and sim(甚) are Geuneum(近音) of Ssangseong(雙聲) Daejeon (對轉). A haneomunjahak(漢語文字學的) review of ≪Hyeontowanyeok Maengjajipju (懸吐完譯 孟子集註)≫ is for the attention of haneomunjahak(漢語文字學 的) in chinese academic world, not for criticism of misinterpretation.