본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고종비 명성왕후/황후 장례절차의 정체성

Nature of the Funeral Proceedings for King Gojong’s Wife Empress Myeongseong

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Emperor Gojong’s wife, Empress Myeongseong, was assassinated by the Japanese in 1895, so her demise was an entirely different from those of the other Joseon queens. It was simply not possible to observe for her the usual funeral procedures [Hyung’rye(凶禮)] as dictated in the Joseon dynastic codes. The funeral for her was inevitably put on hold as King Gojong was forced to seek refuge in the Russian Embassy [Agwan Pacheon(俄館播遷)], and it was even more delayed with Gojong’s declaration of the Daehan Empire’s foundation. And as if that was not enough, codes had to be modified[Byeon’rye(變禮)] for her eventual funeral, and preparations became more complicated when the funeral had to be designed to honor her as an Empress and not a mere Queen. The most distinctive aspect of the funeral for Empress Myeongseong was that it featured elements of both a funeral for a wife of a regional lord, and a funeral for a wife of an Emperor. But at the same time, it also maintained the basic parameters of an ordinary funeral for a Queen. During the “Wuje” stage, held was a “Gu’wu-je(九虞祭)” service which had usually been part of a funeral for an Empress, but other ceremonies that accompanied it, such as the Bu’al-rye(祔謁禮), Yeonje(練祭) and Sangje(祥祭) ceremonies, were not. Bu’al-rye was usually observed in funerals for ordinary Sa/Daebu[大夫士], and references consulted for the Yeonje and Sangje ceremonies were from books about Sa/Daebu funerals.

Abstract

Emperor Gojong’s wife, Empress Myeongseong, was assassinated by the Japanese in 1895, so her demise was an entirely different from those of the other Joseon queens. It was simply not possible to observe for her the usual funeral procedures [Hyung’rye(凶禮)] as dictated in the Joseon dynastic codes. The funeral for her was inevitably put on hold as King Gojong was forced to seek refuge in the Russian Embassy [Agwan Pacheon(俄館播遷)], and it was even more delayed with Gojong’s declaration of the Daehan Empire’s foundation. And as if that was not enough, codes had to be modified[Byeon’rye(變禮)] for her eventual funeral, and preparations became more complicated when the funeral had to be designed to honor her as an Empress and not a mere Queen. The most distinctive aspect of the funeral for Empress Myeongseong was that it featured elements of both a funeral for a wife of a regional lord, and a funeral for a wife of an Emperor. But at the same time, it also maintained the basic parameters of an ordinary funeral for a Queen. During the “Wuje” stage, held was a “Gu’wu-je(九虞祭)” service which had usually been part of a funeral for an Empress, but other ceremonies that accompanied it, such as the Bu’al-rye(祔謁禮), Yeonje(練祭) and Sangje(祥祭) ceremonies, were not. Bu’al-rye was usually observed in funerals for ordinary Sa/Daebu[大夫士], and references consulted for the Yeonje and Sangje ceremonies were from books about Sa/Daebu funerals.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 한영우, "명성황후와 대한제국" (2001), 효형출판
  2. 이욱, "대한제국의 성립과 명성황후(明成皇后) 국장(國葬)의 변화", 종교와 문화, (34), pp.33~66 (2018), 종교문제연구소
  3. "明成皇后國恤謄錄", ~
  4. "高宗實錄", ~
  5. 이민원, "명성황후시해와 아관파천", pp.65~ (2002), 국학자료원
  6. "純祖實錄 권7", ~ (1805)
  7. "明成皇后殯殿魂殿都監儀軌", ~
  8. "國朝喪禮補編", ~
  9. 이현진, "조선후기 궁궐의 殿閣 月臺와 의례 — <동궐도>와 <서궐도안>을 대상으로 —", 동양고전연구, (67), pp.379~418 (2017), 동양고전학회[DOI]
  10. "殯殿移奉慶運宮時班次圖明成皇后發靷班次圖(藏 K3-550)", ~
  11. 이욱, "조선시대 국왕의 죽음과 상장례喪葬禮: 애통․존숭․기억의 의례화" (2017), 민속원
  12. 이현진, "대한제국의 선포와 종묘 제도의 변화 -七廟의 구성과 황제 추존, 신주 改題를 중심으로-", 한국사상사학, (40), pp.499~538 (2012), 한국사상사학회[DOI]
  13. 이현진, "조선 왕실의 상장례", pp.22~ (2017), 신구문화사
  14. "讀禮通考", ~
  15. "독례통고"[URL]
  16. "高宗太皇帝明成太皇后祔廟主監儀軌(藏 K2-2218) 卷上, 時日", ~
  17. "純宗實錄(附錄) 권12", ~ (1920)
  18. "春官通考(下) 卷80, 凶禮 虞祭(附祝式祝板).", ~
  19. "禮記集說大全", ~
  20. "司馬氏書儀 卷8, 喪儀4 「祔」", ~
  21. 이현진, "19세기 조선 왕실의 왕위 계승과 종묘 세실론", 한국사상사학, (32), pp.365~401 (2009), 한국사상사학회
  22. "家禮(奎中 311) 卷6, 喪禮3 「祔」"
  23. 박종천, "朝鮮 後期 『讀禮通考』의 수용과 영향", 한국실학연구, (20), pp.475~506 (2010), 한국실학학회
  24. 박종천, "茶山 丁若鏞의 『讀禮通考』 硏究 初探", 한국실학연구, (21), pp.7~38 (2011), 한국실학학회
  25. 장동우, "茶山 『喪儀節要』의 淵源과 再成文化의 原則", 한국실학연구, (30), pp.325~380 (2015), 한국실학학회
  26. 전성건, "19세기 삼례서연구의 다양성과 고증학의 영향 -정약용, 심대윤, 이진상을 중심으로-", 한국한문학연구, (62), pp.87~116 (2016), 한국한문학회[DOI]
  27. 이현진, "조선시대 종묘의 부묘 의례와 성격", 서울학연구, (43), pp.55~102 (2011), 서울학연구소
  28. "景孝殿日記", ~
  29. "明成皇后國葬都監儀軌", ~
  30. "국장도감의궤", ~
  31. "빈전혼전도감의궤", ~
  32. "산릉도감의궤", ~
  33. "正祖國葬都監儀軌", ~
  34. 이현진, "조선 왕실의 포장(包裝) 문화", 문헌과해석, 82, pp.86~ (2018)
  35. "國朝五禮序例 卷1, 吉禮 壇廟圖說 「山陵」", ~
  36. "正祖健陵山陵都監儀軌", ~
  37. "承政院日記", ~
  38. 유바다, "1894년 淸日戰爭의 발발과 조선의屬國 지위 청산", 대동문화연구, (98), pp.351~382 (2017), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  39. "고종실록", ~
  40. "순종실록", ~
  41. 장영숙, "李王職의 『高宗․純宗實錄』 편찬사업과 그 실상", 사학연구, (116), pp.105~142 (2014), 한국사학회
  42. 정욱재, "日本宮內廳所藏‘公族實錄’의 편찬과 특징-『李熹公實錄』・『李熹公實錄資料』・『李埈公實錄』・『李埈公實錄資料』를 중심으로-", 韓國史學報, (64), pp.33~50 (2016), 고려사학회
  43. 아마가와 에미꼬, "조선왕실의궤의 비밀", pp.75~76 (2012), 기파랑

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)