본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 예수셴(葉舒憲)의 ‘조형예술을 통한 신화학 연구’에 대한 비판적 검토

A Critical Review on Ye Shuxian’s Method of ‘Using Figurative Art for Studying Mythology’

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper aims to provide a critical review on Chinese mythologist Ye Shuxian’s method of ‘using figurative art for studying mythology.’ This method was introduced in Ye’s research project titled ‘Exploration of the Mythology of Chinese Ancestors,’ that was launched in an attempt to historicize Chinese myths. Ye Shuxian selected the so-called ‘quadruple-evidence(四重證據)’ method to carry out the historicization process of Chinese myths. To be more specific, this method considers ‘iconographic material’ as one of the evidences of history, along with three other existing ones such as historical records, written materials, and archaeological remains. In this sense, this paper will carefully study the concept of ‘quadruple-evidence,’ background of the concept’s emergence, examples of research, and its limitations. Afterwards, the paper will also discuss whether figurative art can be considered as an alternative material applicable for studying history. Finally, this paper will also discuss the possibility of using prehistoric and ancient figurative art as an alternative material for understanding the evolution of civilization and the history of Korea’s prehistoric and ancient ages when writing system did not exist.

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a critical review on Chinese mythologist Ye Shuxian’s method of ‘using figurative art for studying mythology.’ This method was introduced in Ye’s research project titled ‘Exploration of the Mythology of Chinese Ancestors,’ that was launched in an attempt to historicize Chinese myths. Ye Shuxian selected the so-called ‘quadruple-evidence(四重證據)’ method to carry out the historicization process of Chinese myths. To be more specific, this method considers ‘iconographic material’ as one of the evidences of history, along with three other existing ones such as historical records, written materials, and archaeological remains. In this sense, this paper will carefully study the concept of ‘quadruple-evidence,’ background of the concept’s emergence, examples of research, and its limitations. Afterwards, the paper will also discuss whether figurative art can be considered as an alternative material applicable for studying history. Finally, this paper will also discuss the possibility of using prehistoric and ancient figurative art as an alternative material for understanding the evolution of civilization and the history of Korea’s prehistoric and ancient ages when writing system did not exist.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 동북아역사재단, "역주 중국 정사 외국전 1 사기 외국전 역주" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  2. 우실하, "동북공정 너머 요하 문명론" (2007), 소나무
  3. 양하이잉, "‘오랑캐’-주변국 지식인이 쓴 反중국 역사" (2018), 살림
  4. 엠마엘 아타티, "예술의 기원" (2008), 바다출판사
  5. 요코야마 유지, "선사예술 기행" (2005), 사계절
  6. 위치우의, "중화를 찾아서" (2010), 미래인
  7. 윤휘탁, "신중화주의-‘중화민족 대가정’ 만들기와 한반도" (2006), 푸른 역사
  8. 孟昭凱, "五千年前的文明" (2009), 北京文聯出版社
  9. 張光蟙, "신화 미술 제사" (1990), 동문선
  10. E.V.뻬레보드치꼬바, "스키타이 동물양식" (1999), 학연문화사
  11. David Lewis-Williams, "Image of Power" (1989), Southern Publishers
  12. David Lewis-Williams, "The Mind In The Cave" (2014), Thames & Hudson
  13. Laurence A.Schneider, "Ku Chieh – Kang and China’s New Mistory" (1971), University of California Press
  14. A.ルロア=グラン, "先史時代の宗敎と藝術" (1985), 日本エディタ-スク-ル出版部
  15. 김선자, "黃帝神話와 國家主義 - 중국신화 역사화 작업의 배경 탐색 : 何新의 論政治國家主義", 중국어문학논집, (31), pp.305~332 (2005), 중국어문학연구회
  16. 우실하, "통일적다민족국가론의 전개와 적용", 고구려발해연구, 29, pp.63~86 (2007), 고구려발해학회
  17. 우실하, "동북공정의 최종판 ‘요하문명론’", 고조선단군학, 15, pp.5~36 (2006), 고조선단군학회
  18. 이유진, "예수셴의 「곰 토템」, 왜 문제적인가?", 중국어문학논집, (77), pp.543~566 (2012), 중국어문학연구회
  19. 이유진, "예수셴의 ‘신화역사’와 ‘옥’ 담론에 대한 비판적 검토― 『중화문명 탐원의 신화학 연구』에 나타난 견해를 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (109), pp.327~364 (2018), 중국어문학연구회
  20. 장석호, "만주 이야기" (2013), 동북아역사재단
  21. 장석호, "이미지 살해 -시베리아의 ‘술렉크스카야 피사니차’를 중심으로-", 역사민속학, (34), pp.355~393 (2010), 한국역사민속학회
  22. 홍윤희, "제이드로드에 소환된 西王母와 중화문명탐원에 바쳐진 신화연구", 중국어문학논집, (91), pp.447~466 (2015), 중국어문학연구회
  23. 姜戎, "狼圖騰" (2004), 長江文藝出版社
  24. 郭大順, "遼河尋根 文明溯源 中華文明起源展" (2011), 文物出版社
  25. 叶舒宪, "中华文明探源的神話學硏究" (2015), 社會科學文獻出版社
  26. 叶舒宪, "物的敍事: 中华文明探源的四重證據法", 蘭州大學學報, 38(6) (2010)
  27. 叶舒宪, "熊圖騰: 中國祖先神話探源" (2007), 上海錦繡文章出版社
  28. 廖明君, "物的敍事: 中华文明探源的神話學硏究", 民族藝術, (1) (2012)
  29. 叶舒宪, "鯀大: 啓化熊的神話通釋-四重證據的立體釋古方法" (2008), 興大中文學報
  30. 叶舒宪, "熊与龍-熊圖騰神話源流考", 博覽群書, (10) (2006)
  31. 叶舒宪, "狼圖騰:還是熊圖騰:?關於中華祖先圖騰的:辨析与 反中思國", 中國圖書評論, (10) (2006)
  32. 叶舒宪, "第四重證據法-比較圖像學的視覺說服力-以猫頭鷹象徵的跨文化解讀爲例", 文學評論, (5) (2006)
  33. 叶舒宪, "西王母神話: 女神文明的中國遺産", 百色學院學報, 24(5) (2011)
  34. 環球時報, "2017.10.1일자 사설 中國正在書寫人類現代史的封面故事", ~ (2017)
  35. 國家文物局, "遼河尋根 文明溯源 中華文明起源展" (2011), 文物出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)