도식적인 내러티브의 연극적 활용 - 분단연극의 사례를 중심으로
The Theatrical Use of Schematic Narrative in The Play of National Division
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
도식적 내러티브는 연극의 창작과 수용에서 매우 중요한 역할을 하면서 주어진 주제를 특별한 방식으로 의미화 시킨다. 이와 같은 전제에서 출발한 본 연구는 도식적 내러티브의 작동방식을 고찰하기 위한 이론적 분석틀을 설계하고, 이에 기초하여 분단연극의 의미작용을 논의하였다. 본 연구의 이론적 분석틀에 따르면, 연극의 내러티브는 거시구조와 미시구조 모두에서 익숙한 도식을 사용할 수 있다. 그 도식은 암암리에 역사적 경험을 반영하는 사회극에 기초할 수 있으며, 과거를 특별한 방식으로 이해하는 문화적 기억을 내포한다. 그 기억 속에서 도식적 내러티브는 고유한 사회적 모순 혹은 갈등을 특별한 방식으로 대면한다. 이와 같은 이론적 분석틀을 분단연극에 도입했을 때 두드러지는 원형적 도식 중의 하나가 <도발 – 수난 – 반격 – 죽음>의 거시구조였다. 이 죽음의 도식은 다양한 사용방식을 수반하여 개별적인 작품마다 분단을 특별한 방식으로 기억하려 한다. 여기서 가장 핵심적인 사건은 죽음으로, 그것의 처리방식에 따라 원형적 도식은 구국의 희생, 피해의 죽음, 순교적 피해의 하위도식으로 다음과 같이 분류된다.
Abstract
The narrative scheme plays a very significant role in theatrical creation and reception, signifying a given subject in a special way. Starting from this premise, the essay attempted to design a theoretical frame of analysis that can investigate the functions of schematic narrative as follows: The theatrical narrative can employ the familiar schemes on both levels of macro and micro structures. The narrative scheme of macro structure tends to reflect the social drama that arises from the historical experience, thus including the cultural memory that understands the past in a special way. While remembering the past, the schematic narrative is apt to confront the inherent social contradiction. On the level of micro structure, the play is composed of schematic fragment stories that can be defined as ‘story codes.’ On the basis of the above theoretical frame, this essay tried to analyze the plays of national division. The resulting archetypal scheme is the macro structure of “provocation – ordeal – counterattack – death.” This archetypical scheme of death can be divided into the sub-schemes depending on the way of treating death as follows: The scheme of sacrificial death for the national salvation sees the divided nation from the perspective of country's destiny, thus remembering the past by adopting the historical view ‘from above.’ In contrast, the scheme of victimized death, focusing on the individual damage, reflects the people's position undergoing the agony of national division in reality, thus attempting to recollect the past from the historical view ‘from below.’ In case of martyrly victimized death that supports indirectly certain ideology by means of dying sees the individual life from the perspective of political history, combining the ‘from below’ view with the ‘from above’ one. As such, there is the change of recognition about the national division which moves from the will of national salvation to the victim mentality. In micro structure, a schematic fragment story named ‘story code’ produces a special meaning in relation to other story code. It seems like a film montage that combines fragments in various ways for the intended effect. One of the results in the plays of national division is the revelation of contradiction inherent in divided country. For instance, the story code of rape maximizes the hostility to the communist forces, while the story code of opposition between brothers makes feel a fraternal love to the communist enemy. The result is the coexistence of contradictory emotions to the communists, thus reflecting the unsolvable contradiction of national division. The contradiction of divided country is also expressed by a story code. Its representative case is the ‘victim/violator story code.’ For instance, the victim who are drafted into a volunteer army of communist by force became the violator who betrayed his country. At this point we need to pay attention to the continuing use of the ‘victim/violator story code’ that functions like a meme in the plays of national division. Another meme maintaining a long life is the ‘violence or plunder story code’ that condemns the communist enemy from the dichotomous thinking. From this we can surmise that the painful insight into the unsolvable contradiction and the dichotomous way of thinking to the divided country pervade almost all of the plays of national division. At the same time the meme dominating the plays of national division at the level of macro structure is the schematic narrative of death that attempts to do certain persuasion by a special treatment of death. In this respect the play of national division depends on the rhetoric of death, endeavoring to break through the problems of divided country in its own way by using death in particular manner.
참고문헌 (36)
- 권순대, "분단희곡의 담론 특성에 관한 연구", 박사, 현대문학, pp.2003
- 김기봉, "역사학의 모더니즘과 포스트모더니즘: 역사이론을 중심으로", 인문연구, 43, pp.44 (2003), ~
- 김석민, "망향삼대" (1982), 한진 출판사
- 김재석, "1950년대 희곡연구" (1998), 새미
- 노경식, "한국희곡문학대계 5" (1976), 한국연극사
- 오영미, "분단희곡연구 I-1960년대를 중심으로", 한국연극연구 (1998)
- 이재현, "서울 극작가 그룹 대표 희곡선" (1984), 집현전
- 이미원, "한국의 전후문학" (1991), 태학사
- 전진성, "기억과 역사: 새로운 역사ㆍ문화이론의 정립을 위하여", 韓國史學史學報, (8), pp.101~140 (2003), 한국사학사학회
- 차범석, "한국희곡문학대계 4" (1976), 한국연극사
- 한노단, "신한국문학전집 42" (1970), 어문각
- 황석영, "한씨 연대기" (2014), 지식을 만드는 지식
- Assamman, Aleida, "기억의 공간 : 문화적 기억의 형식과 변천" (2012), 그린비
- Bell, Elizabeth, "Theories of Performance" (2008), Sage Publications
- Bentley, Eric, "The Life of the Drama" (1979), Atheneum
- Blau, Herbert, "The Eye of Prey" (1987), Indiana UP
- Bordwell, David, "Making Meaning : Inferences and Rhetoric in the Interpretation of Cinema" (1989), Cambridge UP
- Burke, Kenneth, "Drama in Life: The Uses of Communication in Society" (1976), Hasting House
- Carlson, Marvin, "The Haunted Stage : The Theatre as Memory Machine" (2003), The University of Michigan Press
- Chaptman, Seymour, "영화와 소설의 서사구조" (1997), 민음사
- Davis, C. B, "Cultural Evolution and Performance Genres : Memetics in Theatre History and Performance Studies", Theatre Journal, 59(4) (2007)
- Erll, Astrid, "A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies" (2010), De Gruyter
- Erll, Astrid, "Astrid Erll and Ansgar Nünning" (2010), De Gruyter
- Feldman, Yael, "Glory and Agony : Isaac's Sacrifice and National Narrative" (2010), Stanford UP
- Gener, Randy, "분단국가의 아름다운 노래-핵무기로 위협하는 북한, 민족 유산을 통해 새로운 연극성을 모색하는 남한", 연극평론, (24)통권 : 44 (2007)
- Goertz, Hans-Jürgen, "역사학이란 무엇인가" (1995), 뿌리와 이파리
- Jenkins, Keith, "누구를 위한 역사인가" (2002), 혜안
- Marc, Ferro, "영화와 역사" (1998), 까치글방
- Rigney, Ann, "A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies" (2010), De Gruyter
- Roediger, Henry L, "Creating a new discipline of memory studies", Memory Studies, 1 (2008)
- Rokem, Freddie, "Performing History : Theatrical Representations of the Past in Contemporary Theatre" (2000), University of Iowa Press
- Schatz, Thomas, "할리우드 장르의 구조" (1995), 한나래
- Turner, Victor, "From Ritual to Theatre : The Human Seriousness of Play" (1982), PAJ
- Weisberg, Eric, "The Rhetoric of Criticism: Kenneth Burke's Dramatism, a dissertation", pp.1984
- Wertsch, J, "V, Voices of Collective Remembering" (2002), Cambridge UP
- Whitebrook, Maureen, ", Identity, Narrative and Politics" (2001), Routledge
