‘죽도문제연구회’의 「평화선」에 대한 사실 날조 방식
Takeshima Problem Research Group 's fact-making method for "peace line"
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Takeshima Problem Research Group 's fact-making method for "peace line" Choi Jang Keun This study examined the way in which the 'Takeshima Problem Research Group' faked the essence of 'peace line'. The Peace Line, which was signed by the Peace Treaty for Japan and established by the Korean government in the East Sea, maintained the fishing order of the East Sea until the 1965 fishery agreement of the Korea - Japan Agreement was signed. Dokdo's sovereignty was recognized by the Allied Supreme Command as Korea's territory after Japan's defeat and Dokdo was recognized as a jurisdiction for 12 nautical miles around Dokdo. In the Peace Treaty for Japan the Allied Powers changed the actions of the Allied High Command to avoid mentioning Dokdo's status, but did not recognize Dokdo as Japanese territory. However, today 's Takeshima Problem Research Group succeeds the previous Japanese government 's position and fosters Dokdo' s territorial sovereignty by adding new logic to it.
참고문헌 (13)
- 경상북도사료연구회, "竹島問題100問100答에 대한 비판", pp.63~70 (2014), 경상북도
- 경상북도독도연구기관통합협의체, "시마네현 죽도문제연구회의 독도영유권 조작논리", pp.1~170 (2016)
- 독도연구보전협회, "독도영유권자료의 탐구 제3권", pp.341~395 (2000), 독도연구보전협회
- 신용하, "독도영유권에 대한 일본주장의 비판", pp.249~312 (2011), 서울대학교출판부
- 최장근, "일본의 영토", pp.41~42 (2005), 백산자료원
- 최장근, "일본의회의사록이 인정하는 다케시마가 아닌 한국영토 독도", pp.15~ (2014), 제이
- 川上健三, "竹島の歴史地理学的研究", pp.1~291 (1966), 古今書院
- 下條正男, "竹島は日韓どちらのものか" (2004)
- 下條正男, "‘竹島’ その歴史と領土問題", 竹島・北方領土返還要求運動島根県民会議 (2005)
- 島根縣 竹島의 新硏究, "田村清三郎", 島根県総務部総務課, 1~160 (1965)
- 毎日新聞社, "対日平和条約" (1952), 毎日新聞社刊
- "竹島問題硏究會(島根県)"[URL]
- "竹島問題(일본외무성)"[URL]
