본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

현대 한국헌정과 국민통합, 1945-1948: '단정파'와 '중도파'의 정치노선과 헌정구상

Constitution and National Integration in the Modern Korea, 1945-1948: Struggle of Political Lines and Constitutional Ideas between the Right and the Middle

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

This paper intends to examine the struggle of political lines and constitutional ideas for the national integration between the right and the middle in south Korea from 1945 to 1948. It will trace specifically the confrontation between ‘international collaboration route’ and ‘national independent route’. This paper’s theses are as followings: First, the majority of Koreans wants the immediate independence and selfrule around 1945. But, the United States asserted the independence through trusteeship. Second, in the year 1946, there was a big clash between the national independent group and the international collaboration group. Then, the integration policy of the United States was confronted with fundamental crisis. That was caused by the communist’s resistance of the Soviet Union and Korea. Ironically, South Korea right wing was the strongest dissenter. To get over this crisis, the United States tried to exclude the extremist and to support the coalition groups of the left and right(chawoohabjakpa), and established SKILA(namjosungadoibbubiwon). Thirdly, the integrated strategy of the United States breaks down completely at 1947 and the national independent group of Syngman Rhee and the Kim Koo achieved a victory. Fourthly, but, the United States refused to recognize the last failure of the international collaboration line. It was his last effort that Albert E. Brown drew up Development of Political Program to aim at the regeneration of the United States’ first idea. Fifthly, there were the conflict and clash of the constitutional ideas between the right and the middle. The first, Constitution for South Korea. The second, Temporary Constitution of Korea. Lastly, Temporary Constitution of Korea was the first constitution which the right and left came to an agreement with each other through due deliberation in the official organization. It condensed every controversial political issues on national integration between the right and left into a constitution after 1945.

Abstract

This paper intends to examine the struggle of political lines and constitutional ideas for the national integration between the right and the middle in south Korea from 1945 to 1948. It will trace specifically the confrontation between ‘international collaboration route’ and ‘national independent route’. This paper’s theses are as followings: First, the majority of Koreans wants the immediate independence and selfrule around 1945. But, the United States asserted the independence through trusteeship. Second, in the year 1946, there was a big clash between the national independent group and the international collaboration group. Then, the integration policy of the United States was confronted with fundamental crisis. That was caused by the communist’s resistance of the Soviet Union and Korea. Ironically, South Korea right wing was the strongest dissenter. To get over this crisis, the United States tried to exclude the extremist and to support the coalition groups of the left and right(chawoohabjakpa), and established SKILA(namjosungadoibbubiwon). Thirdly, the integrated strategy of the United States breaks down completely at 1947 and the national independent group of Syngman Rhee and the Kim Koo achieved a victory. Fourthly, but, the United States refused to recognize the last failure of the international collaboration line. It was his last effort that Albert E. Brown drew up Development of Political Program to aim at the regeneration of the United States’ first idea. Fifthly, there were the conflict and clash of the constitutional ideas between the right and the middle. The first, Constitution for South Korea. The second, Temporary Constitution of Korea. Lastly, Temporary Constitution of Korea was the first constitution which the right and left came to an agreement with each other through due deliberation in the official organization. It condensed every controversial political issues on national integration between the right and left into a constitution after 1945.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. "남조선과도입법의원속기록영인본" (1999), 서울: 비서처
  2. "Records of US Department of State Relating to the Internal Affairs of Korea, 1945-1949", 1.8.9 (1995), 아름출판사 편
  3. "Press Releases + Translation of Korean Papers", pp.84~
  4. "신탁합의와 미소공위에 나타난 미소의 정책과 결렬요인", 서울 (2006)
  5. "한국의 국가형성, 1945-48: 시각과 해석", 29(1) (1995)
  6. "한국전쟁의 발발과 기원 II 기원과 원인" (2003), 나남출판
  7. "한국분단사연구" (2003), 한울아카데미
  8. "미소공동위원회 연구" (1990), 청계연구소
  9. "그리운 건국대통령 이승만: 이승만 대통령의 업적(1)-거시적 재평가", 202 (2006)
  10. "이승만정권기 미국의 대한정책 연구 (1948-1960)" (2000)
  11. "주한미군정의 ‘임시한국행정부’ 수립 구상과 독립촉성중앙협의회" (1996)
  12. "미군정기 이승만의 ‘방미외교’와 미국의 대응" (1995), 서울
  13. "한국민족주의’와 ‘미국식 민주주의’ 해방직후의 정치적 대립과 미국 대한정책의 성격 규명" (2001), 내일을 여는 역사
  14. "미군정내 정치활동 담당기구와 인물 연구 ‘중도정책’ 추진자들의 존재형태와 관련하여" (2003), 선인
  15. "남북한 분단정권 수립과정 연구" (1995)
  16. "1898 “이탈리아 공산당의 노선 분석 사회주의의 한 대안적 모색", ” 한국산업사회학회
  17. "The Origins of the Korean War 한국전쟁의 기원", Princeton Univ Press; 브루스 커밍스
  18. "인간의 조건" (1996), 서울: 한길사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)