본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해방기(1945-1948) 헌법초안의 사법조항 분석-좌파, 우파, 중간파 및 미 군정청 헌법초안을 중심으로-

The Judiciary Provisions in the Draft Constitutions of the Immediate Post-Liberation Period : Left-wing Draft Constitution, Right-wing Draft Constitution, Moderate-wing Draft Constitution, and USAMGIK Draft Constitution

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

What was the type of judicial system that we, the people of Korea actually wanted in the immediate post-liberation period? To answer this question, I analyzed the ju- diciary provisions of various “Draft Constitutions” during 1946—1947. In the judi- ciary provisions of the left-wing Draft Constitution, Joseonminjugonghwaguk Imsi- yakbeop(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of the Korean Democratic Republic), and the left-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “elected” and the jury system shall be adopted. Following the example of the Soviet Constitution, it is provided that the independent prosecutors’ office shall have extensive powers and shall be parallel to the court. On the contrary to this, in the judiciary provisions of the right-wing Draft Constitution, Hanguk Heonbeop (The Constitution of Korea), and the right-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “nominated” and the adoption of the jury system shall be postponed. Modelled after Western judicial system, it is provided that the independence of the courts and the judges, including judges’ lifetime appointments, shall be guaranteed. In the judiciary provisions of the moderate-wing Draft Constitutions, repre- sented by Daehanminguk Imsiheonbeop(Provisional Constitution of the Republic of Korea) and Joseon Imsiyakheon(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of Korea), as well as in the moderate-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the tenure of the judges shall be ten years and the appointment of the supreme court justices, who have the power of judicial constitutionality review, shall be con- troled indirectly by the congress or directly by the citizens. As in the left-wing ju- diciary provisions, it is also provided that the jury system shall be adopted. In the judiciary provisions of Emery J. Woodall’s Draft Constitution(The Constitution of Korea) prepared by the US Army Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK) and Draft Con- stitutions prepared by the US delegation to the US-USSR Joint Commission(The Proposed Charter of the Provisional Korean Democratic Government[A⋅B⋅C]), it is noted that the judges, unlike in the left-wing judiciary provisions, shall not be elected and they, unlike in the right-wing judiciary provisions, shall not enjoy lifetime appointments.

Abstract

What was the type of judicial system that we, the people of Korea actually wanted in the immediate post-liberation period? To answer this question, I analyzed the ju- diciary provisions of various “Draft Constitutions” during 1946—1947. In the judi- ciary provisions of the left-wing Draft Constitution, Joseonminjugonghwaguk Imsi- yakbeop(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of the Korean Democratic Republic), and the left-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “elected” and the jury system shall be adopted. Following the example of the Soviet Constitution, it is provided that the independent prosecutors’ office shall have extensive powers and shall be parallel to the court. On the contrary to this, in the judiciary provisions of the right-wing Draft Constitution, Hanguk Heonbeop (The Constitution of Korea), and the right-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the judges shall be “nominated” and the adoption of the jury system shall be postponed. Modelled after Western judicial system, it is provided that the independence of the courts and the judges, including judges’ lifetime appointments, shall be guaranteed. In the judiciary provisions of the moderate-wing Draft Constitutions, repre- sented by Daehanminguk Imsiheonbeop(Provisional Constitution of the Republic of Korea) and Joseon Imsiyakheon(Provisional Draft of the Constitution of Korea), as well as in the moderate-wing reply to the US-USSR Joint Commission, it is noted that the tenure of the judges shall be ten years and the appointment of the supreme court justices, who have the power of judicial constitutionality review, shall be con- troled indirectly by the congress or directly by the citizens. As in the left-wing ju- diciary provisions, it is also provided that the jury system shall be adopted. In the judiciary provisions of Emery J. Woodall’s Draft Constitution(The Constitution of Korea) prepared by the US Army Military Government in Korea(USAMGIK) and Draft Con- stitutions prepared by the US delegation to the US-USSR Joint Commission(The Proposed Charter of the Provisional Korean Democratic Government[A⋅B⋅C]), it is noted that the judges, unlike in the left-wing judiciary provisions, shall not be elected and they, unlike in the right-wing judiciary provisions, shall not enjoy lifetime appointments.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 고려대학교박물관, "현민 유진오 제헌헌법 관계 자료집" (2009), 고려대학교출판부
  2. 김수용, "건국과 헌법—헌법논의를 통해 본 대한민국건국사" (2008), 경인문화사
  3. 김정실, "세계헌장" (1947), 삼중당
  4. 문준영, "미군정기 법원조직법의 입법과정: 미국립문서관 법원조직법관계문서철의 소개와 분석", 법사학연구, (32), pp.235~305 (2005), 한국법사학회
  5. 사법부법률조사국, "각국헌법총집(상⋅하)" (1947)
  6. 서희경, "민주공화주의와 대한민국 헌법 이념의 형성", 정신문화연구, 30(1), pp.77~111 (2007), 한국학중앙연구원
  7. 신동운, "수사지휘권의 귀속에 관한 연혁적 고찰(I)—초기 법규정의 정비를 중심으로—", 서울대학교 법학, 42(1) (2001)
  8. 신용옥, "8·15 후 좌우세력의 헌법 제정 시도에 대한 사실 관계 해석과 그 정치적 성격 - 민주주의민족전선, 비상국민회의, 민주의원을 중심으로-", 역사교육, (106), pp.119~156 (2008), 역사교육연구회
  9. 신용옥, "우파세력의 單政 立法 시도와 조선임시약헌 제정의 정치적 성격", 韓國史學報, (28), pp.86~122 (2007), 고려사학회
  10. 신우철, "임시약헌(1927. 3. 5) 연구: 제정 경위, 구조와 내용, 위원제 정부형태", 법사학연구, (31), pp.241~285 (2005), 한국법사학회
  11. 신우철, "해방기 헌법초안의 헌법사적 기원-임시정부 헌법문서의 영향력 분석을 통한 ‘유진오 결정론’ 비판-", 공법연구, 36(4), pp.389~434 (2008), 한국공법학회
  12. 유진오, "헌법기초회고록" (1980), 일조각
  13. 이경주, "미군정기의 과도입법의원과 조선임시약헌", 법사학연구, (23), pp.139~163 (2001), 한국법사학회
  14. 이국운, "해방공간에서 사법기구의 재편과정에 관한연구", 법과사회, (29), pp.135~175 (2005), 법과사회이론학회
  15. 이영근, "통일일보 회장 고 이영근 회고록(하)—이승만, 박헌영을 제압하다", 월간조선, (126) (1990)
  16. 이영록, "유진오 헌법사상의 형성과 전개" (2006), 한국학술정보
  17. "임시정부수립대강—미소공위자문안답신집", 새한민보사, ~ (1947)
  18. 정상우, "대한민국임시정부 헌법과 1948년헌법", 법과사회, (32), pp.185~225 (2007), 법과사회이론학회
  19. 정상우, "미군정기 중간파의 헌정구상에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2007
  20. 정용욱, "해방전후 미국의 대한정책사 자료집⋅9—미소공동위원회 자료(4)" (1995), 다락방
  21. 조선산업노동조사소, "쏘연방헌법" (1945), 우리문화사
  22. 한국미래학회, "제헌과 건국" (2010), 나남
  23. 허헌, "東西 十二諸國을 보고 와서", 별건곤, (7) (1927)
  24. "헌법기초 당시의 회고담 : 장경근 의원과의 대담", 국회보, (20) (1958)
  25. "헌법기초 당시의 회고담 : 최하영 씨와의 대담", 국회보, (20) (1958)
  26. 宮澤俊義, "中華民國憲法確定草案", 中華民國法制硏究會, ~ (1936)
  27. 美濃部達吉, "歐洲諸國 戰後の新憲法" (1922), 有斐閣書房
  28. 美濃部達吉, "憲法撮要" (1923), 有斐閣
  29. "ソ聯新憲法關係資料(滿鐵ソ聯硏究資料 第27號", 南滿洲鐵道株式會社, ~ (1937)
  30. "ソヴィエト社會主義共和國聯邦法令集(第1輯)" (1931), 外務省歐米局第一課
  31. 原武, "中華民國憲法(滿鐵調査資料 第93編)", 南滿洲鐵道株式會社, ~ (1929)
  32. 佐田弘雄, "ソヴイエット憲法(労農ロシア叢書)" (1929), 上野書店
  33. 土橋友四郎, "日本憲法 比較對照 世界各國憲法" (1925), 有斐閣書房
  34. 夏新華, "近代中國憲政歷程 : 史料薈萃", 中國政法大學出版社 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)