Q-블럭과 Q-도구의 일치도 연구
Agreement Between the Q-Block and the Q-Tool
0
조회
0
다운로드
66
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to explore the agreement or consistency between the Q-Block and the Q-Tool that were constructed to identify the typology based on the factors found throughout the Q Method. Both tools are very useful to examine the characteristics of people who are belong to a specific type, and to test the difference by types in terms of demographics and other related variables. This study adopted the two examples to test the agreement rate, which means that how many people are assessed as the same type by both tools. The first example having three factors showed 62.20 percent while the second example composing four factors showed 70.08 percent. Researchers should be aware of the advantages/disadvantages and limitations of each tool when they choose one.
참고문헌 (8)
- 김승환, "텔레비전 뉴스의 시청유형과 그 특성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- 김흥규, "Q 방법론: 과학철학, 이론, 분석 그리고 적용" (2008), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김흥규, "아로마 선호 유형. 제11차 한국주관성연구학회 학술대회 발표논문" (2001), 한국주관성연구학회
- 김흥규, "가치와 라이프스타일 유형에 따른 소비자 특성 연구", 광고학연구, 10(2), pp.173~197 (1999)
- KT BcN 서비스 발굴 을 위한 시장 세분화 조사 보고서, "현대리서치연구소", ~ (2005)
- Talbott, A. D., "The Q block method of indexing Q typologies", Presented at the AEJ Conference, Lincoln, Lebraska (1963)
- Holsti, O., "Content analysis for the social science and humanities" (1969), AddisonWesley
- Scott, W., "Reliability of content analysis:The case of nominal scale coding", Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, pp.321~325 (1955)