근대국어 일음절 한자 어근 형용사의 소멸과 변화 양상
Disappearance and changes of adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters out of modern Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This part has stated list and meaning of adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters out of adjectives used in modern Korean and their changes. These adjectives have three aspects- disappearance after modern Korean, change of forms, and change of meaning. Most of adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters such as ‘熱다’ and ‘溫다’ disappearing in the 18th century had been adjectives used for verb and adjective from Middle Korean. Aside from this type, most of adjectives disappeared in the 19th century. In addition, for positive aspects such as ‘高’ and '多’, adjectives existed, but for negative aspects such as ‘底' and '少’, adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters didn't exist even during modern Korean. ‘密다’ changed to ‘密密다’, by repeating the same Chinese characters. On the other hand, adjectives combining other Chinese characters such as ‘安다-平安다’ show individual meanings for two Chinese characters are mixed. For adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters whose meaning changes, most of them didn't make pairs of synonyms in native words- the majority of which have continued by minimizing meaning and some of which have continued by maximizing or totally changing meaning.
Abstract
This part has stated list and meaning of adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters out of adjectives used in modern Korean and their changes. These adjectives have three aspects- disappearance after modern Korean, change of forms, and change of meaning. Most of adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters such as ‘熱다’ and ‘溫다’ disappearing in the 18th century had been adjectives used for verb and adjective from Middle Korean. Aside from this type, most of adjectives disappeared in the 19th century. In addition, for positive aspects such as ‘高’ and '多’, adjectives existed, but for negative aspects such as ‘底' and '少’, adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters didn't exist even during modern Korean. ‘密다’ changed to ‘密密다’, by repeating the same Chinese characters. On the other hand, adjectives combining other Chinese characters such as ‘安다-平安다’ show individual meanings for two Chinese characters are mixed. For adjectives with roots in one syllable Chinese characters whose meaning changes, most of them didn't make pairs of synonyms in native words- the majority of which have continued by minimizing meaning and some of which have continued by maximizing or totally changing meaning.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고영근, "표준 중세국어 문법론(개정판)" (1997), 집문당
- 고영근, "중세국어의 시상과 서법(보정판)" (1998), 탑출판사
- 고창운, "우리말 맛 그림씨의 어휘장 연구 - ‘달다’류와 ‘시다’류 어휘를 중심으로 -", 한국언어문학, (56), pp.5~24 (2006), 한국언어문학회
- 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (1999), 두산동아
- 표준국어대사전 연구 분석, "국립국어원", 국립국어원, ~ (2002)
- 김광해, "국어 어휘론 개설" (1993), 집문당
- 김정남, "국어 형용사의 의미 구조", 한국어의미학, 8, pp.171~199 (2001), 한국어의미학회
- 김정남, "국어 형용사의 연구" (2005), 도서출판 역락
- 김종택, "국어 어휘론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 김태곤, "국어 어휘의 통시적 연구" (2008), 박이정
- 박병채, "국어 발달사" (1996), 세영사
- 박병철, "韓國語 訓釋 語彙 硏究" (1997), 以會文化社
- 방영심, "근대국어 형용사 연구 : 어휘 체계와 의미 관계를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 석주연, "국어 형용사의 어휘사 : 파생형용사의 어휘사를 중심으로", 한국어 의미학, 9, pp.49~64 (2001), 한국어의미학회
- 송민, "어휘 변화의 양상과 그 배경", 국어생활, 22, pp.42~57 (1990), 국립국어연구원
- 심재기, "국어어휘론" (2000), 집문당
- 이광호, "근대국어문법론" (2004), 태학사
- 이기문, "국어사개설" (1998), 탑출판사
- 이선영, "近代國語 色彩語의 몇 가지 特徵", 어문연구(語文硏究), 36(4), pp.131~151 (2008), 한국어문교육연구회
- 이영경, "중세국어 형용사 구문에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2003
- 이현희, "국어 어휘사 연구의 흐름, In 국어학연구백년사(Ⅱ)", pp.529~540 (1992), 일조각
- 임지룡, "국어 의미론" (1992), 탑출판사
- 임지룡, "20세기의 국어 어휘와 어휘연구", 국어국문학, 6(152), pp.63~98 (2009), 국어국문학회
- 홍윤표, "근대국어 연구(Ⅰ)" (1994), 태학사
- 홍윤표, "17세기 국어사전(상, 하)" (1995), 태학사
- Lyons, J, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Ullmannm, S., "의미론: 의미 과학 입문" (1987), 탑출판사
