로렌스와 문학생태학
Lawrence and Literary Ecology
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
We can find many elements of literary ecology in Lawrence’s literature which are simply not a stress of nature or environment. In Lawrence’s works, the point of human ecological lives is not expressed only by pure nature or wild field but by the dealing of human affection, reason and complicated human relations. Lawrence’s works have much value of depth on literary ecology which is superior to natural ecology or environmental ecology. Lawrence’s religion, ideology, theory, and thought are harmonious and unified with nature, and his characters are appeared by using natural power and physical things themselves, not by using a simile of natural images. There are ecological expressions and awareness of the relations between man and universe, not the simple reflection of human lives on nature or romantic expression of nature in his works. We can feel his ecologism, not with a theory about the meaning of mystical experience, but with glimmerings of the experience of nature itself. Lawrence’s works embody his ecological themes which express the organic complexion of human history and natural history. They also express the unity between human and nature, and human feeling by using natural physical power directly. It makes us recognize that man lives in nature and man is a component in nature, not a conqueror of it. His various works make us feel through experiential recognition that the relationship between man and nature is evolved and has been changed towards ecological direction. I think the revival of natural environment is only possible now that nature has apparently been subdued by industrial technology. His literary ecology stresses the vitality and sacredness of nature and environment once again at present.
Abstract
We can find many elements of literary ecology in Lawrence’s literature which are simply not a stress of nature or environment. In Lawrence’s works, the point of human ecological lives is not expressed only by pure nature or wild field but by the dealing of human affection, reason and complicated human relations. Lawrence’s works have much value of depth on literary ecology which is superior to natural ecology or environmental ecology. Lawrence’s religion, ideology, theory, and thought are harmonious and unified with nature, and his characters are appeared by using natural power and physical things themselves, not by using a simile of natural images. There are ecological expressions and awareness of the relations between man and universe, not the simple reflection of human lives on nature or romantic expression of nature in his works. We can feel his ecologism, not with a theory about the meaning of mystical experience, but with glimmerings of the experience of nature itself. Lawrence’s works embody his ecological themes which express the organic complexion of human history and natural history. They also express the unity between human and nature, and human feeling by using natural physical power directly. It makes us recognize that man lives in nature and man is a component in nature, not a conqueror of it. His various works make us feel through experiential recognition that the relationship between man and nature is evolved and has been changed towards ecological direction. I think the revival of natural environment is only possible now that nature has apparently been subdued by industrial technology. His literary ecology stresses the vitality and sacredness of nature and environment once again at present.
참고문헌 (31)
- 공명수, "생태학적 상상력과 사회적 선택" (2010), 동인
- 김욱동, "문학 생태학을 위하여" (1998), 민음사
- 김정매, "로렌스의 생태주의적 사유: 노마드적 “됨”과 끝없는 “탈주”", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 10(1), pp.1~ (2002), 한국로렌스학회
- 니체, "짜라투스투라는 이렇게 말했다" (2001), 문예출판사
- "생태학"[URL]
- 양영수, "로렌스 문학에 대한 생태주의적 재검토", D.H.로렌스 연구, 9(2) (2001)
- 엄정옥, "D. H. 로렌스의 이원론과 문학 생태학 - 초기 소설을 중심으로 -", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 14(1), pp.1~15 (2006), 한국로렌스학회
- 이경수, "The White Peacock에 나타난 Lawrence의 자연관", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 11(1), pp.6~144 (2003), 한국로렌스학회
- 이영철, "『사랑하는 여인들』에 나타난 로렌스의 생태미학", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 17(1), pp.69~88 (2009), 한국로렌스학회
- 정화열, "몸의 정치" (1999), 민음사
- 한삼순, "『흰 공작』에 나타난 환경생태론적 주제", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 13(2), pp.95~122 (2005), 한국로렌스학회
- 황규완, "로렌스의 교육에 나타난 교육", D.H. 로렌스 연구, 13(2), pp.123~152 (2005), 한국로렌스학회
- Buell, Lawrence, "Writing for an Endangered World" (2001), Harvard UP
- Cobb, Edith., "The Ecology of Imagination in Childhood" (1993), Spring Publications
- Chambers, Jessie, "D. H. Lawrence: A Personal Record" (1965), Cass
- Heraclitus. Fragments, "The Collected Wisdom of Heraclitus" (2001), Viking
- Huxley, Aldous, "The Perennial Philosophy" (1945), Chatto & Windus
- Kuhn, Thomas, "S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1996), U of Chicago P
- Lawrence, D. H., "John Thomas and Lady Jane" (1973), Viking
- Lawrence, D. H., "The Letters of D. H. Lawrence I" (1979), Cambridge UP
- Lawrence, D. H., "Phoenix" (1936), Viking
- Lawrence, D. H., "The Plumed Serpent" (1966), Knopf
- Lawrence, D. H., "The Rainbow" (1960), Viking
- Lawrence, D. H., "Sons and Lovers" (1958), Viking
- Lawrence, D. H., "Studies in Classic American Literature" (1977), Penguin
- Lawrence, D. H., "Women in Love" (1960), Viking
- Lovelock,J.E., "Gaia as seen through the atmosphere", Atmospheric Environment, 6(8) (1972)
- Nehls, Edward, "D. H. Lawrence: A Composite Biography" (1959), U of Wisconsin Press
- Sanders, Scott, "The Left handedness of Modern Literature", Twentieth-Century Literature, 23(4), pp.417~436 (1977)
- Schorer, Mark, "Lawrence and the Spirit of Place. in D. H. Lawrence: A Critical Survey.", pp.280~294 (1969), Forum House
- Slovic, Scott, "Seeking Awareness in American Nature Writing" (1992), U of Utah P