본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

D. H. 로렌스의 이원론과 문학 생태학 - 초기 소설을 중심으로 -

D. H. Lawrence’s Dualism and Literary Ecology -Centered on The White Peacock, The Trespasser, Sons and Lovers-

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Abstract

D. H. Lawrence’s Dualism and Literary Ecology-Centered on The White Peacock, The Trespasser, Sons and Lovers-Jeong-oak Ohm(Wonkwang U)This paper attempts to prove the possibility that The White Peacock, The Trespasser, Sons and Lovers can be approached by ecological thought. In Lawrence’s early novels, he rejects the binomial contrast which becomes the tradition of western thought by his dualism. After Descartes, the western men degrade their body and enhance the spirit and the intelligence. This inner split of human being is different from Lawrence’s dualism and the oriental thought in which the spirit and the body, the human being and the nature is thought as organic and wholesome. The binomial contrast between spirit and body is deeply related with that of human being and nature. The degradation of human being’s body in the western Europe is led to the degradation of nature. Lawrence asserts that the revival of life-force of human being is the solution to relive the human being in the modern world.The human being establishes the net of relation between opposition and from the point of view that the Yin and the Yang are not in opposition but two faces of the same reality, the oriental thought of the Yin and the Yang, deep ecology and Lawrence’s dualism are in the same orbit.We can say that one theme of The White Peacock, The Trespasser, Sons and Lovers is the conflict between the character of male principle and the character of female principle. It is what we call the conflict between the ecological character and the character of the anti-ecological character. As a result, we can say that The White Peacock, The Trespasser, Sons and Lovers are the works that belong to the category of literary ecology. And we can regard that Lawrence presented the paradigm previously that ecologist advocates.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 강정석, "로렌스와 육체의 위상", D. H. 로렌스 연구, 11(2), pp.25~46 (2003)
  2. 김욱동, "문학 생태학을 위하여" (1998), 서울: 민음사
  3. 니체, "짜라투스투라는 이렇게 말했다" (2001), 서울: 문예출판사
  4. 박주식, "에고(ego)에서 에코(eco)로: 생태학적 문학이론의 정립을 위해", 미국학 논집, 33(1), pp.211~245 (2001)
  5. 정화열, "몸의 정치" (1999), 서울: 민음사
  6. De Beauvoir, Simome, "The Second Sex" (1985), New York: Vintage Books
  7. Daleski, A. M, "The Forked Flame: A Study of D. H. Lawrence" (1965), London: Faber and Faber
  8. Ford, G. H., "Double Measure" (1966), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  9. Lachapelle, Dolores, "D. H. Lawrence: Future Primitive" (1996), Denton: Univ. of North Texas Press
  10. Lawrence, D. H, "Phoenix" (1972), Harmondworth: Penguin Books
  11. "Sons and Lovers" (1970), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
  12. "The Trespasser" (1976), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
  13. "The White Peacock" (1989), Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
  14. Niven, Alastair, "D. H. Lawrence: The Novels" (1978), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  15. Simpson, Hillary, "D. H. Lawrence and Feminism" (1982), Dekalb: Nothern Illinois University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)