중국의 RPS제도 도입 관련 논의에 대한 법적 분석

Abstract

China's Renewable Energy Law and Policy in China within a short time for the development and use of renewable energy, ensuring that gave the most basic system. However, many problems still exist. RPS and FIT are two main policy instruments in promoting the renewable energy development abroad. A few studies have assessed their effectiveness, but most do not account for policy design features and market characteristics that influence policy strength. The FIT provides a protective umbrella for the renewable energy power development. RPS policies require electric utilities to provide renewable electricity to their customers, typically as a percentage of total energy use. It is important to note the main differences between FIT and RPS policies to understand their potential relationship to each other. RPS mandates prescribe how much customer demand must be met with renewables, while properly structured FIT policies attempt to support new supply development by providing investor certainty. As mentioned earlier, FIT policies are typically designed to provide a renewable project with revenue streams sufficient to cover development costs, plus a reasonable return. They are focused on setting the right price to drive RE deployment. In contrast, most RPS policies are focused on the quantity, leaving the price up to competitive bidding. In this paper, reviewed what system is better choice in china from “renwable energy law”. FIT and RPS system will to be continue. China put aside when such a situation in Germany, the USA, Japan, Korea and other cases examined by the development of a number of countries in the future will be to make a decision again.