Multicultural Crisis Management: South Korea's Judicial Interpreting System and Its Missing Blocks
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
South Korea's judicial interpreting system was introduced in 2005 as a supportive institution for protecting human rights of foreigners under criminal charges. The system was developed by the country's judicature without legislative engagement and has continuously been improved as such. Although certain academic fields have attempted to add legally binding forces to the system, little attention has been paid to the sociological and historical contexts of the system. For the purpose of legislating the system, the elements that hinder the legislating process need to be identified. In this study, the sociological and historical concepts of a "nation," "nationhood," and "citizenship" are reviewed to understand South Korea's Nationality Act to briefly discuss its post-modern inclination toward homogeneous nationalism. Based on the theoretical examination, the country's judicial interpreting system that lacks legally binding forces and field-focused practical data are suggested as the two missing blocks of complementing the system. As an initiative step, this paper concludes with the analysis of how the system is applied and practiced on different occasions and what elements are left to be improved.
Abstract
South Korea's judicial interpreting system was introduced in 2005 as a supportive institution for protecting human rights of foreigners under criminal charges. The system was developed by the country's judicature without legislative engagement and has continuously been improved as such. Although certain academic fields have attempted to add legally binding forces to the system, little attention has been paid to the sociological and historical contexts of the system. For the purpose of legislating the system, the elements that hinder the legislating process need to be identified. In this study, the sociological and historical concepts of a "nation," "nationhood," and "citizenship" are reviewed to understand South Korea's Nationality Act to briefly discuss its post-modern inclination toward homogeneous nationalism. Based on the theoretical examination, the country's judicial interpreting system that lacks legally binding forces and field-focused practical data are suggested as the two missing blocks of complementing the system. As an initiative step, this paper concludes with the analysis of how the system is applied and practiced on different occasions and what elements are left to be improved.
참고문헌 (27)
- "Act on the Employment of Foreign Workers. Enactment 16 August 2003. Law No. 6967", ~ (2003)
- A Study on Measures to Improve Judiciary Interpreting in Criminal Justice Procedures, "An, Sung-Hoon", Korean Institute of Criminology, 1~377, pp.12-AA-05 (2012)
- Anderson, Benedict, "Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism" (1983), Gil
- 백동현, "러ㆍ일전쟁 전후 ‘民族’ 용어의 등장과 민족인식 - 『皇城新聞』과 『大韓每日申報』를 중심으로", 韓國史學報, (10), pp.149~179 (2001), 고려사학회
- Brubaker, Rogers, "Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany" (1994), Harvard University Press
- Choe, Hyun, "National Identity and Citizenship in the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea", Journal of Historical Sociology, 19(1), pp.84~118 (2006)
- ". Establishment May 2004. Supreme Court Judicial Established Rule No. 1040" (2004)[URL]
- "Framework Act on the Korean Language. Enactment 27 January 2005. Law No. 7368", ~ (2005)
- "Framework Act on the Treatment of Foreigners Residing in the Republic of Korea. Enactment 17 May 2007. Law No. 8442", ~ (2007)
- 홍서연, "국내 사법통역 교육의 현황 및 제언: 보고논문", 통번역학연구, 22(2), pp.207~231 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 정철자, "법정통번역 국가전문자격제도 도입 방안 연구", 번역학연구, 21(2), pp.285~309 (2020), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 강지혜, "다문화 담론에서 통역의 역할 연구", 번역학연구, 14(5), pp.7~42 (2013), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- (2023)[URL]
- 김수자, "구한말 단일민족주의의 형성과정 고찰", 한국사상사학, (30), pp.223~250 (2008), 한국사상사학회
- 구본규, "‘다문화’는 어떻게 이주민 가족을 비하하는 말이 되었나?: ‘다문화가족’ 만들기와 이주민의 범주화", 동북아 문화연구, 1(42), pp.5~34 (2015), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- The 1st Master Plan for Immigration Policy, "Korea Immigration Service", Ministry of Justice, ~ (2008)
- (2021)[URL]
- Lee, Jieun, , pp.1~252 (2012), Chimmundang
- 이지은, "결혼이민자 통번역서비스 사업을 통해 본 지역사회통역 사례연구", 번역학연구, 15(3), pp.177~210 (2014), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이지은, "사법통역제도 개선에 관한 소고", 법학논집, 20(3), pp.251~280 (2016), 법학연구소
- 이지은, "평가 척도를 이용한 사법통역 평가 사례연구", 번역학연구, 20(2), pp.81~109 (2019), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- (2020)[URL]
- (2022)[URL]
- [URL]
- "Multicultural Families Support Act. Enactment 21 March 2008. Law No. 8937", ~ (2008)
- 박광동, "사법통역 관련 입법모델 구축에 관한 연구", 법과정책, 29(1), pp.121~143 (2023), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
- Torpey, John C, "The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State" (2000), Cambridge University Press