본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지방분권 확대에 대응한 지방자치단체의 농촌정책 추진 여건 분석- 일반농산어촌개발사업 추진 시‧군을 중심으로 -

Condition for Rural Development Led by Local Governmentsin the Era of Increasing Devolution

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

The purpose of this study is to figure out the current condition of local governments (Si or Gun) to implement rural development policy in the face of the central government’s drive for increasing devolution. Since late 1990s or early 2000s when scope of rural policy began to expand quantitatively, there has been considerable increase in rural residents’ participation into community projects as a whole. Nevertheless, there exists regional differentiation in local governments’ efforts to systematically support rural development projects (CRDP: Comprehensive Rural Development Programme) and community activities by setting up intermediary organizations or hiring rural development professionals in a public office. According to this survey on local government officials, regions that have made such efforts to support rural policy at a local level, show more advanced level of institutional capacity than other regions in local decision making process for CRDP, role of strategic rural developmental plans, vitality of community actors, etc. In the era of increasing devolution, these differences can be expected to result in diverging performances of each area in regionalized rural policy. The central government needs to introduce EU’s LEADER-type rural development programmes to support community acitivities by various local actors and at the same time promote local governance building for rural policy, adopting institutional rewarding system such as rural planning contract.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to figure out the current condition of local governments (Si or Gun) to implement rural development policy in the face of the central government’s drive for increasing devolution. Since late 1990s or early 2000s when scope of rural policy began to expand quantitatively, there has been considerable increase in rural residents’ participation into community projects as a whole. Nevertheless, there exists regional differentiation in local governments’ efforts to systematically support rural development projects (CRDP: Comprehensive Rural Development Programme) and community activities by setting up intermediary organizations or hiring rural development professionals in a public office. According to this survey on local government officials, regions that have made such efforts to support rural policy at a local level, show more advanced level of institutional capacity than other regions in local decision making process for CRDP, role of strategic rural developmental plans, vitality of community actors, etc. In the era of increasing devolution, these differences can be expected to result in diverging performances of each area in regionalized rural policy. The central government needs to introduce EU’s LEADER-type rural development programmes to support community acitivities by various local actors and at the same time promote local governance building for rural policy, adopting institutional rewarding system such as rural planning contract.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 조영재, "지방정부의 농촌개발사업 추진체계의 문제점과 개선과제- 충청남도를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(1), pp.35~47 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
  2. Expectation for Rural Social Economy: Quality of Life and Job Creation, "Kim, J. S.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 95~120 (2018)
  3. Koo, J. I., "Local Level Implementation System for Rural Development Policy:Case Study on Chungnam Province", Proceedings of the Korean Society of Rural Planning Conference (2018)
  4. Village Making: 10 Years of Jinan Gun's Experiences and System Building, "Koo, J. I.", KRIHS, ~ (2011)
  5. 권동건, "농촌현장포럼 효과분석 - 주민의 인식 변화 및 만족도를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 21(4), pp.13~26 (2015), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  6. Oh, H. S., "Reflection on Rural Development in Korea and New Policy Approach", Rural Policy Research Quarterly, 57, pp.42~55 (2016)
  7. 박덕병, "지방분권에 따른 농촌협치와 농촌개발정책의 과제", 농촌사회, 14(2), pp.47~107 (2004), 한국농촌사회학회
  8. Study on Bottom-up Rural Development Strategy, "Park, J. D", Center for Food, Agriculture and Rural Policy, ~ (2002)
  9. 박준규, "일반농산어촌개발사업이 농촌 지역주민 삶의 질에 미치는 영향", 농촌계획, 23(4), pp.75~90 (2017), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  10. A study on developing the system for environment-friendly rural villages, "Park, S. H", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2000)
  11. In-depth Evaluation of Improvement Quality of Life for Farmers and Fishermen and Rural Development Scheme, "Seong, J. I", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2012)
  12. Policy Directions of Improving Rural Development Planning System and Revision of Rural Development Act, "Seong, J. I.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2012)
  13. Policy Directions of Improving Rural Development Planning System, "Seong, J. I", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2011)
  14. Actual Conditions in Managing the Korean Block Grant System and Its Improvement Directions, "Song, M. R.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2011)
  15. Evaluation of Rural Village Development Programs and Suggestions for Participatory Village Development Model, "Song, M. R.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2004)
  16. Systematic Organization Scheme for MIFAFF Policy Programs and Projects in the Age of Creative Area-Wide Development, "Song, M. R.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2008)
  17. Establishment of Integrated Rural Development Model and Action Plan, "Song, M. R", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2010)
  18. A Study on the Comprehensive Rural Development Program: Performance Evaluation and Policy Improvement, "Song, M. R", MAFRA & Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2018)
  19. Problems of Current Rural Development Implementation in Local Governments and Policy Direction, "Yu, J. G.", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 233~262 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)