요한복음 18:1-27에 나타난 ego eimi와 ouk eimi ㅡ 베드로의 인물성격을 중심으로 ㅡ
ego eimi and ouk eimi in John 18:1-27 ㅡ Focusing on the Characterization of Peter ㅡ
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main goal of the article is to explore the distinctive theological meanings based on the characterizations of Peter and other characters by focusing on Peter's sword play and denials and Jesus' self-identification and witness through a narrative reading on John 18:1-27. For this narrative exegesis, the characterization is critically surveyed under the rubric of the narrative criticism and source criticism. While the narrative unfolds, the distinctive features of each character are also portrayed. In John 18:1-9, Judas is portrayed as a traitor and he was standing with the arresting party, yet Jesus knocks them to the ground by the divine self-identification formula (ego eimi). Likewise, Jesus completely controls this dangerous situation with his divine word, but Peter attacks the high priest's servant (Malchus) through his sword play in an attempt to defend and protect Jesus. Jesus was not impressed by Peter's inconsiderate behavior and rather speaks to him solemnly about his mistaken action(18:10-11). Ultimately, Jesus was arrested and brought into the high priest's house(18:13). After his first denial, Peter was standing with the servants of the high priest and was keeping warm by the fire(18:18, 25). Peter's standing with them recalls how Judas stood with the armed soldiers to arrest Jesus. Also, Peter's two, "I am not“(ouk eimi) denials(18:17, 25) are starkly contrasted with Jesus' three "I am he"(ego eimi) confessional self-identification statements (18, 5, 6 and 8). Peter's three denials in John 18:15-18, 25-27 come from the cutaway scene of Jesus' interrogation before the high priest with scenes of Peter's denials before the servants (gatekeeper, the servants, and a relative of Malchus) in the courtyard of the high priest. Thus, the characterizations between Jesus and Peter are even more starkly contrasted in John 18:19-24. When Jesus was investigated by the high priest about his disciples and his teaching, he boldly declares his openly publicized teaching without of secrecy and rather challenges him, “Ask those who heard me. Surely they know him what I said”(18:21). Moreover, Jesus did not hide his disciples and he did not betray his disciples, while Peter did keep his secret about Jesus and betrayed him by denying him three times.
Abstract
The main goal of the article is to explore the distinctive theological meanings based on the characterizations of Peter and other characters by focusing on Peter's sword play and denials and Jesus' self-identification and witness through a narrative reading on John 18:1-27. For this narrative exegesis, the characterization is critically surveyed under the rubric of the narrative criticism and source criticism. While the narrative unfolds, the distinctive features of each character are also portrayed. In John 18:1-9, Judas is portrayed as a traitor and he was standing with the arresting party, yet Jesus knocks them to the ground by the divine self-identification formula (ego eimi). Likewise, Jesus completely controls this dangerous situation with his divine word, but Peter attacks the high priest's servant (Malchus) through his sword play in an attempt to defend and protect Jesus. Jesus was not impressed by Peter's inconsiderate behavior and rather speaks to him solemnly about his mistaken action(18:10-11). Ultimately, Jesus was arrested and brought into the high priest's house(18:13). After his first denial, Peter was standing with the servants of the high priest and was keeping warm by the fire(18:18, 25). Peter's standing with them recalls how Judas stood with the armed soldiers to arrest Jesus. Also, Peter's two, "I am not“(ouk eimi) denials(18:17, 25) are starkly contrasted with Jesus' three "I am he"(ego eimi) confessional self-identification statements (18, 5, 6 and 8). Peter's three denials in John 18:15-18, 25-27 come from the cutaway scene of Jesus' interrogation before the high priest with scenes of Peter's denials before the servants (gatekeeper, the servants, and a relative of Malchus) in the courtyard of the high priest. Thus, the characterizations between Jesus and Peter are even more starkly contrasted in John 18:19-24. When Jesus was investigated by the high priest about his disciples and his teaching, he boldly declares his openly publicized teaching without of secrecy and rather challenges him, “Ask those who heard me. Surely they know him what I said”(18:21). Moreover, Jesus did not hide his disciples and he did not betray his disciples, while Peter did keep his secret about Jesus and betrayed him by denying him three times.
참고문헌 (40)
- James L. Resseguie, "Narrative Criticism of the New Testament" (2005), Baker Academic
- R. Alan Culpepper, "Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design" (1983), Fortress Press
- 김문현, "요한복음의 인물연구 역사와 방법론 고찰", 신약논단, 15(3), pp.769~804 (2008), 한국신약학회
- 김선정, "한국신약학 50년의 회고와 전망: 요한문헌 연구", 신약논단, 19(3), pp.825~857 (2012), 한국신약학회
- F. Neirynck, "The ‘Other’ Disciple in Jn 18.15-16", Ephemerides thelologicae lovanienses, 51 (1975)
- E. Haenchen, "John 2: A Commentary on the Gospel of John Chapters 7-21" (1984), Fortress
- R. Schnackenburg, "The Gospel according to St. John I", pp.186~ (1990), Crossroad
- Gerald L. Borchert, "John 12-21" (2002), Broadman & Holman Publishers
- Gerald L. Borchert, "John 1-11", pp.81~19 (1996), Broadman & Holman Publishers
- J. H. Charlesworth, "The Beloved Disciple: Whose Witness Validates the Gospel of John?", pp.127~224 (1984), Trinity Press International
- A. J. Droge, "The Status of Peter in the Fourth Gospel: A Note on John 18:10-11", JBL, 109 (1990)
- A. H. Maynard, "The Role of Peter in the Fourth Gospel", NTS, 30 (1984)
- M. Goulder, "St. Paul vs. St. Peter: A Tale of Two Visions" (1994), WJK
- P. S. Minear, "The Composition of John’s Gospel: Selected Studies from Novum Testamentum" (1999), Brill
- Bradford B. Blaine Jr., "Peter in the Gospel of John" (2007), SBL
- "JTS", 1989, 481~489
- G. F. Snyder, "John 13:16 and the Anti-Petrinism of the Johannine Tradition", BR, 16 (1971)
- Mark W. G. Stibbe, "John" (1993), Sheffield Academic Press
- 김문현, "요한복음에 등장하는 유다, 그는 누구인가?", 신약연구, 11(4), pp.828~853 (2012), 한국복음주의신약학회
- 김문현, "요한복음 17장 어떻게 읽을 것인가? ― 교회를 향한 예수의 비전 ―", 신약연구, 10(4), pp.825~858 (2011), 한국복음주의신약학회
- James L. Resseguie, "The Strange Gospel: Narrative Design & Point of View in John", pp.68~ (2001), Brill
- C. H. Talbert, "Reading John: A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Fourth Gospel and the Johannine Epistles", pp.232~233 (1988), Crossroad
- F. W. Danker, "A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature", pp.736~737 (2000), The University of Chicago Press
- R. G. Maccini, "Her Testimony is True: Women as Witnesses according to John", pp.156~ (1966), Sheffield Academic Press
- T. L. Brodie, "The Gospel According to John: A Literary and Theological Commentary" (1993), Oxford University Press
- R. E. Brown, "The Gospel according to John 2", pp.812~ (1970), Doubleday
- D. E. Garland, "John 18-19: Life through Jesus’ Death", RevExp, 85, pp.487~ (1985)
- D. Daube, "Three Notes Having to Do with Johanan ben Zaccai", JST, 11, pp.61~ (1960)
- P. Perkins, Peter, "Apostle for the Whole Church", pp.99~ (1994), University of South Carolina Press
- T. Wiarda, "Peter in the Gospels: Pattern, Personality and Relationship", pp.139~ (2000), Mohr Siebeck
- 서종석, "요한복음서의 베드로와 애제자", 신학논단, 19, pp.25~44 (1991)
- K. Wengst, "Das Johannesevanglium", pp.208~ (2001), Kohlhammer
- G. Stanton, "The Gospels and Jesus", pp.114~ (2002), Oxford University Press
- H. C. Waetzen, "The Gospel of the Beloved Disciple: A Work in Two Editions" (2005), T & T Clark
- R. T. Fortna, "Jesus and Peter at the High Priest’s House: A Test Case for the Question of the Relation between Mark’s and John’s Gospel", NTS, 24, pp.371~383 (1978)
- Wes Howard-Brook, "John’s Gospel & The Renewal of The Church", pp.114~ (2001), Orbis Books
- F. J. Moloney, "The Gospel of John, Sacra Pagina 4", pp.487~ (1998), Liturgical Press
- M.W.G. Stibbe, "John’s Gospel", pp.181~ (1994), Routledge
- G. H. C. MacGregor, "The Gospel of John", pp.332~333 (1928), Hodder and Stoughton
- C. S. Keener, "Gospel of John: A Commentary 2", pp.1092~ (2003), Hendrickson