본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

「という」の使用実態に関する実証的分析 ー発話名詞が後接する場合を中心にー

Empirical study of Japanese Adnominal in TOIU with utterance noun

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

TOIU shown up in adnominal clause is used and is not used. In this paper, TOIU is used with the utterance noun, we use in any sentence and we of not used installs,whether the basic reason tries to be made public. The action related to the speech act is included in the meaning of the word. The thing called the utterance noun is the noun expressed as the character or audio. For example, it is the mail, public anouncement, question, story, rumor, and etc. In the previous work, the use of essentiality of TOIU was asserted when this kind of the utterance noun was used. We knew that there is 3 branch types doesn't take the result, of analyze the corpus data used in fact use, not used, and adnominal clause called case. In this paper, how 3 branch types about the reality of usage of TOIU showed differently, whether the analysis was attempted by the following 3 factors. Firstly,it is "doesn't it coincide with whether the subject of the main clause and subordinates coincides?". The second opinion factor is" the content of the subordinates authorizes the inside approval outside to the territory of information when the subject of the main clause observes". The third factor is "the content of the subordinates authorizes the reality approval unreality when the subject of the main clause observes".

Abstract

TOIU shown up in adnominal clause is used and is not used. In this paper, TOIU is used with the utterance noun, we use in any sentence and we of not used installs,whether the basic reason tries to be made public. The action related to the speech act is included in the meaning of the word. The thing called the utterance noun is the noun expressed as the character or audio. For example, it is the mail, public anouncement, question, story, rumor, and etc. In the previous work, the use of essentiality of TOIU was asserted when this kind of the utterance noun was used. We knew that there is 3 branch types doesn't take the result, of analyze the corpus data used in fact use, not used, and adnominal clause called case. In this paper, how 3 branch types about the reality of usage of TOIU showed differently, whether the analysis was attempted by the following 3 factors. Firstly,it is "doesn't it coincide with whether the subject of the main clause and subordinates coincides?". The second opinion factor is" the content of the subordinates authorizes the inside approval outside to the territory of information when the subject of the main clause observes". The third factor is "the content of the subordinates authorizes the reality approval unreality when the subject of the main clause observes".

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 大島資生, "連体修飾節に現われるというの機能について", 人文学報, (225), pp.27~58 (1991), 河出書房 東京都立大学人文学会
  2. 神尾昭雄, "続・情報のなわ張り理論" (2002), 大修館書店
  3. 徐珉廷, "日本語話者と韓国語話者における主観的な<事態把握>の対照研究―「ていく", くる」と「e kata, 박사, pp.昭和女子大学大学院[DOI]
  4. 寺村秀夫, "寺村秀夫論文集Ⅰ―日本語文法編―" (1992), くろしお出版
  5. 趙銀淑, "日・韓表現構造の対照研究―受動表現における文法的なズレと視点のズレ―", 日語日文学研究, 48(1), pp.181~200 (2004), 韓国日語日文学会
  6. 戸村佳代, "名詞修飾におけるトイウの機能(2)―というの意味的機能―", 明治大学教養論集, (242), pp.215~231 (1991), 明治大学
  7. 戸村佳代, "トイウの再考", 明治大学教養論集, (251), pp.189~199 (1992), 明治大学
  8. 丹羽哲也, "引用を表す連体複合辞トイウ", 人文研究, 45(1), pp.25~60 (1993), 大阪市立大学大阪市立大学文学部
  9. Josephs, Lewis, "Complementation, In Syntax and Semanitscs, Vol.3 Japanese Generative Grammar", pp.307~370 (1976), Academic Press
  10. 江国香織, "웨하스의 의자" (2004), 소담
  11. 吉本ばなな, "도마뱀" (1993), 믿음사
  12. 東野圭吾, "비밀" (2001), 창해
  13. 北山恭一, "세상의 중심에서 사랑을 외치다" (2005), 지식여행

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)