본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Differences in Personality and Defense Style According to the Levels of Borderline Personality Organization Model on the Network Perspective

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to compare the network characteristics of personality traits and defense styles based on the personality organiza tion model. We categorized the personality disorder (PD) group into two borderline personality organizations (BPO) according to Otto Kernberg’s model. A total of 766 patients with PDs were enrolled based on the diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV-text revision and DSM-5. The high BPO group included 448 patients diagnosed with avoidant, dependent, histrionic, and narcissistic PDs, while the low BPO group comprised 318 patients diagnosed with border line, antisocial, paranoid, schizoid, and schizotypal PDs. We created a network using 12 PD characteristics from the Personality Disorder Questionnaire-4+ and 4 defense styles from the Defense Style Questionnaire, treating these as nodes within each BPO group. An extended Bayesian Information Criterion and graphical lasso model were employed to construct the network. To com pare the networks, we analyzed global strength and individual edges using the Network Comparison Test (NCT). The results showed that the global strength of the low BPO group was higher than that of the high BPO group (high BPO: 7.63, low BPO: 9.35, p=0.029). The NCT confirmed a significant difference in network structure between the two groups (p=0.043), with varia tions at the individual edge level. This indicates that the low BPO group exhibits more severe personality pathology with a poorer prognosis than the high BPO group.

Abstract

This study aims to compare the network characteristics of personality traits and defense styles based on the personality organiza tion model. We categorized the personality disorder (PD) group into two borderline personality organizations (BPO) according to Otto Kernberg’s model. A total of 766 patients with PDs were enrolled based on the diagnostic criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV-text revision and DSM-5. The high BPO group included 448 patients diagnosed with avoidant, dependent, histrionic, and narcissistic PDs, while the low BPO group comprised 318 patients diagnosed with border line, antisocial, paranoid, schizoid, and schizotypal PDs. We created a network using 12 PD characteristics from the Personality Disorder Questionnaire-4+ and 4 defense styles from the Defense Style Questionnaire, treating these as nodes within each BPO group. An extended Bayesian Information Criterion and graphical lasso model were employed to construct the network. To com pare the networks, we analyzed global strength and individual edges using the Network Comparison Test (NCT). The results showed that the global strength of the low BPO group was higher than that of the high BPO group (high BPO: 7.63, low BPO: 9.35, p=0.029). The NCT confirmed a significant difference in network structure between the two groups (p=0.043), with varia tions at the individual edge level. This indicates that the low BPO group exhibits more severe personality pathology with a poorer prognosis than the high BPO group.

관련 논문AI추천

The Complexity of Borderline Personality Disorder: Network Analysis of Personality Factors and Defense Styles in the Context of Borderline Personality Organization구본훈, Eun-Jin Cheon, Hye-Geum Kim, Hye-Jin Jeon, Seokho Yun, So-Hye Jo대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2024 · 제21권 제6호DSM-Ⅳ B와 C 군집 인격장애에서 방어기제와 심리적 특성의 차이: 경계성 인격구조 이론과의 시사점차영, 구본훈, 김응조, 김혜금, 송신호, 이준엽, 정진영, 천은진, 최중현한국정신분석학회 · 정신분석2014 · 제25권 제1호우울증에서 방어기제에 따른 유형별 심리학적 특성: 경계성 인격구조 이론과의 시사점구본훈, 김보람, 김혜금, 윤석호, 정현석, 조소혜한국정신분석학회 · 정신분석2021 · 제32권 제4호신경증 환자에서 자살시도와 성격 및 방어기제 인자 간의 초 진단적 네트워크 분석구본훈, 김혜금, 윤석호, 정현무, 조소혜, 천은진한국정신분석학회 · 정신분석2022 · 제33권 제3호경계성 인격장애 환자와 우울증 환자의 임상양상, 심리특성 및 방어기제의 차이곽호완, 구본훈, 권정해, 장문선한국정신분석학회 · 정신분석2011 · 제22권 제2호Defense Mechanisms and Psychological Characteristics According to Suicide Attempts in Patients with Borderline Personality DisorderCheon Eun-Jin, Cho Young-Chul, Keum Mu-Sung, Kim Hye-Geum, Koo Bon-Hoon, Lee Young-Ji대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2020 · 제17권 제8호