본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

日本近代轉換期女性たちのネットワーク形成と階層化 -福澤家を事例に

The Formation of Women’s Network and the Development of Class Divisions at a Time of Rapid Change in Modern Japanese History

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

『学問のすすめ』や『文明論之概略』によって有名な福澤諭吉は、若いころから一夫一婦や男女の平等を主張し、女性にも「交際之道」を開きたいと考えていた。それは、日本を「男女共有寄合之国」と考える福澤にとって、男性とともに社会を担うためのネットワークの形成を意味した。明治改元以後、福澤が掲げた目標は、人々の「一身独立」であり、個人の確立こそが「一国独立」の基礎を成すと考えた。そして「一身独立」した個人を国家へと繋ぐものは、「人間交際」であり、近代社会は人間交際によって形成されると主張した。明治13(1880)年1月彼は、地方の活性化も目論んだ新たな情報ネットワークとなる交詢社を設立するが、女性は会員にはなれなかった。すでに「中津留別之書」(1871)や『学問のすすめ』第8編(1874)で男女の平等を説いた福澤であったが、同組織には現在に至るまで女性会員は存在しない。しかし福澤は、女性が人間交際の場から排除されてもいいと考えていたわけではなかった。「男女交際論」では、女性を人間交際から擯斥し「有れども無きが如きの地位に陥らしめた」のは、日本の「一大不幸」であると述べている。そして明治18(1885)年頃から福澤家では、女性を主客とする集会が行われるようになった。集会にはさまざまな種類があり、なかでも茶話会は人と人との交際の推進を目的とし、案内状には来賓たちの談話の媒介になることが主人の本意であると書かれている。しかし、福澤の妻や娘たちに関する資料からみれば、彼女たちの交際はほとんど縁戚関係の域を出ない。福澤家の集会は、表面上は女性も主体性をもった交際に見え、ネットワークの広がりを感じさせるが、しかし残存する園遊会や茶話会の招待者名簿から窺い知れるのは、集まっていた女性たちがその夫や父親を通じて、彼らに帰属する存在として福澤に把握されて招待されたことである。彼が作り得たのは女性個人ではなく、家族のネットワークであった。家族を単位とするネットワークになってしまえば、結果としてその交際は、新たな階層性を生む。福澤は競争原理を説くが、階層化されていく環境のなかではあまり意味をもたなかった。

Abstract

Fukuzawa Yukichi is best known as a leading figure in the early Meiji debate about Japan’s future path, a member of the Meirokusha and author of works such as 『学問のすすめ』 An Encouragement of Learning. As part of his general emphasis on individual independence and self-respect, he consistently criticized the double standard according to which only married women were expected to be faithful, and supported the idea of male-female equality. In Fukuzawa’s opinion, it was 「人間交際(jinkan kosai)」(human relations) that formed the basis of modern societies. Since he defined Japan as 「男女共有寄 合之国」(a country in which men and women were gathered together), he therefore wished to make 「交際之道」(the way of social relations) open to women as well as men. He argued that a strong nation could only be formed when independent individuals came together through human relations. Thus, he recognized the great importance of social networks. Fukuzawa declared his support for male and female equality as early as 1871 (in 「中津留別之書」(A Farewell to Nakatsu)). Even so, 交詢社(the Kojunsha), a new information network that he helped to form in January 1880, did not allow women to become members. Paradoxically, the main reason for this was probably that it was modeled on British and American gentlemen’s clubs. In 『男女交際論』(On Relations between Men and Women, 1886) he emphasized that women should not be excluded from human relations. The fact that this had occurred in Tokugawa Japan had led to “most tragic consequences 「一大不幸」for Japan”. From around 1885, the Fukuzawa residence became the site for a range of social events. The object was to give women opportunities to play the main role in activities that would further human relations. In an invitation to a tea party, for example Fukuzawa wrote that his true intention was to provide a setting for conversations among the guests. His motives become clearer when one considers that 1885 was around the time that members of the elite were pursuing their own form of social relations in parties at the Rokumeikan and elsewhere, as part of the search for “civilization and enlightenment”. When his wife and daughters were invited to join貴婦人法話会(The Noble Ladies’ Association for Lectures on Buddhism), he replied that they would not participate if the use of “noble” was designed to establish a pecking order in society. Fukuzawa aimed for new types of networks that would allow the free exchange of all types of information and strongly criticized the type of meeting where men drank together while being entertained by geisha(Jiji shinpo, 1886). However, the material that we have so far gathered regarding his female relatives suggests that their social relations were limited to the family circle. The only exceptions are his fourth daughter, Shidachi Taki, and his sister-inlaw, Imaizumi To. The tea parties and other gatherings at the Fukuzawa residence suggest the growth of networks involving women. However, surviving guest lists reveal that the participants are identified as “The wife of…,” “The mother of…” and so on. In other words, they were only invited because they were the wives, mothers, and daughters of men belonging to Fukuzawa’s networks, for example his former students. It is not clear how far the Fukuzawa family is typical of its time, but it is likely to have been difficult for women to form their own networks for the exchange of information. Rather, their participation was limited to family-based networks.

참고문헌 (5)

  1. "福澤諭吉全集" (1969), 岩波書店
  2. "福澤諭吉書簡集" (2001), 岩波書店
  3. "福澤諭吉著作集" (2002), 慶應義塾大学出版会
  4. "福澤諭吉事典" (2010), 慶應義塾
  5. "交詢社百年史" (1983), 交詢社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)