본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상법총칙·상행위법 개정안의 주요쟁점

Issues in Proposal for Revised Commercial Code

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In order to modernize the Commercial Code in Korea, the Ministry of Justice in Korea organized “the Special Committee for Amendment on Commercial Code” (hereinafter “the Committee”) in February 2008. The aim of the Committee is to propose to revise some statutes in the Commercial Transaction Part in the General Provision of the Commercial Code. The proposed revision of the Commercial Code takes into account recent changes in various business environments as well as newly created and developed commercial transactions such as commercial broadcasting and electronic transactions that are not defined in the existing Commercial Code. In addition, the revised Commercial Code is to stipulate legal relationships between parties in transactions in order to solve uncertain legal problems arising in new commercial transactions such as lease, franchise, and factoring. As such, the revised Commercial Code will make great contribution to improve the legal certainty in these new commercial transactions. Since the existing Commercial Code uses many Japanese legal jargons that are far from being understandable among lay people in Korea, another purpose of establishing the Committee is tore write the Commercial Code in plain Korean vocabularies. Furthermore, through the revised Commercial Code, global standards in business and economy will be more enhanced in Korea. Nonetheless, the revision of the Commercial Code has not been systematically achieved to date. Rather, only a small number of statutes in the existing Commercial Code that do not reflect current business environments at all have been proposed to be revised. It is recommended that in the next revision, the Commercial Code should take into full consideration current practices in commercial transactions at the time. Besides, the Commercial Code should be more modernized in terms of legal vocabularies in statues since the existing Commercial Code is tainted with old-fashioned legal terminologies, which have confused the public.

Abstract

In order to modernize the Commercial Code in Korea, the Ministry of Justice in Korea organized “the Special Committee for Amendment on Commercial Code” (hereinafter “the Committee”) in February 2008. The aim of the Committee is to propose to revise some statutes in the Commercial Transaction Part in the General Provision of the Commercial Code. The proposed revision of the Commercial Code takes into account recent changes in various business environments as well as newly created and developed commercial transactions such as commercial broadcasting and electronic transactions that are not defined in the existing Commercial Code. In addition, the revised Commercial Code is to stipulate legal relationships between parties in transactions in order to solve uncertain legal problems arising in new commercial transactions such as lease, franchise, and factoring. As such, the revised Commercial Code will make great contribution to improve the legal certainty in these new commercial transactions. Since the existing Commercial Code uses many Japanese legal jargons that are far from being understandable among lay people in Korea, another purpose of establishing the Committee is tore write the Commercial Code in plain Korean vocabularies. Furthermore, through the revised Commercial Code, global standards in business and economy will be more enhanced in Korea. Nonetheless, the revision of the Commercial Code has not been systematically achieved to date. Rather, only a small number of statutes in the existing Commercial Code that do not reflect current business environments at all have been proposed to be revised. It is recommended that in the next revision, the Commercial Code should take into full consideration current practices in commercial transactions at the time. Besides, the Commercial Code should be more modernized in terms of legal vocabularies in statues since the existing Commercial Code is tainted with old-fashioned legal terminologies, which have confused the public.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 강위두, "상법강의(상)" (2006), 형설출판사
  2. 김성태, "상법총칙·상행위 강론(2판)" (2002), 법문사
  3. 이철송, "상법총칙ㆍ상행위(제6판)" (2007), 박영사
  4. 정찬형, "상법(상)(제11판)" (2007), 박영사
  5. 최준선, "상법총칙·상행위법(제4판)" (2008), 삼영사
  6. 이철송, "상법의 입법착오의 시정에 관한 연구(1)", 비교사법, 12(4)통권 : 31 (2005), 한국비교사법학회
  7. 정경영, "상법총칙, 상행위편 개정의견", 상사법연구, 24(2) (2005), 한국상사법학회
  8. 송양호, "상법 총칙 및 상행위 개정 특별분과위원회 제4차 회의자료(2008. 3. 28)", ~ (2008)
  9. 유진희, "상법 총칙 및 상행위 개정 특별분과위원회 제5차 회의자료(2008. 4. 11)", ~ (2008)
  10. 정순섭, "상법 총칙 및 상행위 개정 특별분과위원회 제4차 회의자료(2008. 3. 28)", ~ (2008)
  11. 정순섭, "상법 총칙 및 상행위 개정 특별분과위원회 제7차 회의자료(2008. 5. 9)", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)