《诸儒鸣道集》再议
A Re-examination on Zhuru Mingdao Ji
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
作者通过对《诸儒鸣道集》的年代及编者问题的讨论质疑了晚近学界的一个看法，即认为《诸儒鸣道集》比起朱熹所编的权威道学文献（如《伊洛渊源录》、《近思录》）更能真实地反映道学初期的面貌。文章提出，不应过高估计《诸儒鸣道集》对道学史的参考价值，道学史不必因此而改写。作者还对《诸儒鸣道集》收录的程学周边六家之书有关佛老的言论做了考察，尤其是对前人没有研究的《迂书》和《元城语录》做了仔细分析，最后得出结论认为：这些著作或不无袭用佛老言语，但其中并无为佛老张目之文字，其所鸣之道为儒家之道无可可疑，此六家被《宋史》作者排除《道学传》外，难称公允。
Abstract
The author refutes a recently view that zhuru mingdao ji reflects more truly the image of Dao Xue School in the early stage than some authoritative literatures of Dao Xue School such as yiluo yuanyuan lu and jinsilu which edited by Zhu Xi, after discussion of the question about the writing time and editor. The paper holds that it shouldn’t be overvalued zhuru mingdao ji for the history of Dao Xue School. This paper investigates the texts about comparing Confucian with Buddhist and Taoist, which are included in the works of six scholars who are excluded from Biographies of Dao Xue School in Sung Dynasty History. The author especially studies at Yu Shu and Yuancheng Yulu which have not been discussed by now. The paper concludes that the principles of these six scholars are certainly Confucian.
참고문헌 (21)
- 佚名, "诸儒鸣道" (1992), 山东友谊书社影印宋刻本
- 朱熹, "朱子全书" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 程颢, "二程集" (2004), 中华书局
- "司马光，《温国文正司马公文集》，四部丛刊本", ~
- "王崇庆，《元城语录解》，四库全书本", ~
- "李纯甫，《屏山鸣道集说》，京都：中文出版社影印亨保四年本", ~
- "释念常，《佛祖历代通载》，北京：北京图书馆影印元刻本", ~
- 张春波, "肇论校释" (2005), 中华书局
- "晁公武，《郡斋读书志》，四库全书本", ~
- "赵希弁，《郡斋读书附志》，四库全书本", ~
- 陈振孙, "直斋书录解题" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 脱脱等, "宋史" (1985), 中华书局
- 黄宗羲, "宋元学案" (1986), 中华书局
- 冯友兰, "三松堂全集" (2001), 河南人民出版社
- 田浩, "朱熹的思维世界" (2009), 凤凰出版集团
- 田浩, "评余英时的《朱熹的历史世界》", 世界哲学, 4 (2004)
- 陈来, "略论<诸儒鸣道集", 北京大学学报, 1 (1986)
- 陈来, "中国近世思想史研究" (2003), 商务印书馆
- 赵振, "<诸儒鸣道集>所收<二程语录>考述", 河南师范大学学报, 1 (2006)
- 邱佳慧, "<诸儒鸣道>与道学之再检讨", 박사, pp.2005
- 付云辉, "<诸儒鸣道集>述评", 박사, pp.2007