본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

연구개발사업 성과요인의 추적조사 연구

A Study on Follow-up Survey on Performance Factors of Research & Development Programs

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

(Purpose) This study aims to focus on the follow-up of the SSK program performance promoted by the National Research Foundation since 2010. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the performance factors of the SSK programs and to suggest ways to support it. (Design/methodology/approach) The research method utilized FGI, SURVEY analysis, etc. for follow-up and evaluation. The results of the social science support project subject to research are 2010 to 2019, and the performance survey for follow-up evaluation is from August 8 to September 7, 2019 for one month. (Findings) The analysis results are as follows. First, the interest level of the SSK program was 80.2%, the performance creation was 87.0%, and the necessity of the program was 95.4%. In addition, the evaluation criteria of the research program emphasized compatibility and productivity. Second, the efficiency of each growth stage is decreasing in middle and large projects. As the research task progresses to middle and large-sized tasks, the research scope, subject, and required results are intensifying, so it is necessary to improve the efficiency through adjustment of research works and research costs. Third, as a future support plan for the SSK program, it was found that many respondents hoped for a SSK follow-up program(post SSK or SSK+). Fourth, it was found that the performance of the SSK project was strengthened when policy utilization and research topics were linked. (Research implications or Originality) In the future, in order to improve the performance of research projects, it is necessary to establish a promotion system that can link performance with policy research teams at each stage.

Abstract

(Purpose) This study aims to focus on the follow-up of the SSK program performance promoted by the National Research Foundation since 2010. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the performance factors of the SSK programs and to suggest ways to support it. (Design/methodology/approach) The research method utilized FGI, SURVEY analysis, etc. for follow-up and evaluation. The results of the social science support project subject to research are 2010 to 2019, and the performance survey for follow-up evaluation is from August 8 to September 7, 2019 for one month. (Findings) The analysis results are as follows. First, the interest level of the SSK program was 80.2%, the performance creation was 87.0%, and the necessity of the program was 95.4%. In addition, the evaluation criteria of the research program emphasized compatibility and productivity. Second, the efficiency of each growth stage is decreasing in middle and large projects. As the research task progresses to middle and large-sized tasks, the research scope, subject, and required results are intensifying, so it is necessary to improve the efficiency through adjustment of research works and research costs. Third, as a future support plan for the SSK program, it was found that many respondents hoped for a SSK follow-up program(post SSK or SSK+). Fourth, it was found that the performance of the SSK project was strengthened when policy utilization and research topics were linked. (Research implications or Originality) In the future, in order to improve the performance of research projects, it is necessary to establish a promotion system that can link performance with policy research teams at each stage.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. The Study on Performance Evaluation System to Government Support Program, "Kang, Young Chul", The Korea Institute of Public Administration, ~, pp.KIPA 2010-07 (2010)
  2. Kim, Dae-Han, "Study of Activation Plan for Interdisciplinary Convergence Research in the Social Sciences : Focusing on SSK(Social Sciences Korea) project", pp.2015
  3. 김문수, "국가연구개발 성과추적평가관리 시스템 모형 및 활용", 기술혁신학회지, 11(4), pp.613~638 (2008), 한국기술혁신학회
  4. Performance Evaluation System for National R&D Program in the New Government, "Kim, Seong Soo", Science and Technology Policy Institute, ~ (2008)
  5. Park, Byung-sik, "Improvement plan of the R & D project tracking evaluation index system: targeting the tracking research of the energy research infrastructure construction program", The Korean Association For Policy Analysis And Evaluation, pp.115~135 (2013)
  6. 박수호, "한국 사회과학계의 연구협업에 대한 시론적 탐색 - 한국사회과학연구(SSK)지원사업 참여 연구자들을 중심으로", 담론201, 17(1), pp.5~37 (2014), 한국사회역사학회[DOI]
  7. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce martet failures?: Microeconometric evaluation studies, "Klette, Tor Jakob Jarle Moen", ~ (2000)
  8. L. Josh, "The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SIBR program", Journal of Business, 72(3), pp.285~318 (1999)
  9. 이광희, "인문사회분야 연구지원사업 추적평가시스템 구축 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 23(3), pp.295~321 (2019), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  10. Stecher, Brian M., "How to Focus an Evaluation" (1987), Sage Publication Inc
  11. Thompson, J., "Building Collective Communication Competence in Interdisciplinary Research Teams", Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(3), pp.278~297 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)