PUBLIC VALUE: Impacts of Government R&D Funding on R&D Performance
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Government R&D investment maintains the expansion of R&D investment in key promotion fields such as finding future growth engines, economic innovation, and future biotech strategy. It is necessary to im-prove the efficiency of R&D investment in response to the worsening financial condition of the government, as manifested by slowing economic growth and increasing welfare demand. This study aims to analyze the factors affecting R&D performance, focusing on government funding. We investigate the impact of research papers, pa-tents, and commercialization performance by controlling characteristics of researchers who have received govern-ment projects. We expect to present policy ideas that can enhance R&D performance. Method: This study applies multiple regression to the analysis. The data used in this survey are data on the implementation status and performance of national R&D projects by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Information and the Korea Science and Technology Evaluation. This survey provides basic data for promoting evidence-based efficient national R&D projects and presenting policy direction. The study will use the most recent-ly published data for 2016. Results: Government R&D funding has a positive effect on enhancing scientific and technological performance, SCI, and Patents. But there is no effect on commercialization of the Government R&D funding. Second, it is shown that SCI, Patents, and commercialization are higher in project status than a new project. Third, in the case of SCI, patents, the performance of government-affiliated and universities, is generally higher than the National Institute. Fourth,fundingon new technologies ofIT sector showed higher performance than SCI and Patents. Finally, rural variables have higher commercialization performance in other regions than Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi. Conclusion: This suggests that Government R&D should continue to be supported. Also, the government R&D support on Government-affiliated and universities plays a positive role. Our findings suggest that Government R&D funding should be concentrated on technology characteristics. As well as, Government R&D funding should take regional characteristics into account when considering commercialization performance.
Abstract
Purpose: Government R&D investment maintains the expansion of R&D investment in key promotion fields such as finding future growth engines, economic innovation, and future biotech strategy. It is necessary to im-prove the efficiency of R&D investment in response to the worsening financial condition of the government, as manifested by slowing economic growth and increasing welfare demand. This study aims to analyze the factors affecting R&D performance, focusing on government funding. We investigate the impact of research papers, pa-tents, and commercialization performance by controlling characteristics of researchers who have received govern-ment projects. We expect to present policy ideas that can enhance R&D performance. Method: This study applies multiple regression to the analysis. The data used in this survey are data on the implementation status and performance of national R&D projects by the Ministry of Science, Technology, and Information and the Korea Science and Technology Evaluation. This survey provides basic data for promoting evidence-based efficient national R&D projects and presenting policy direction. The study will use the most recent-ly published data for 2016. Results: Government R&D funding has a positive effect on enhancing scientific and technological performance, SCI, and Patents. But there is no effect on commercialization of the Government R&D funding. Second, it is shown that SCI, Patents, and commercialization are higher in project status than a new project. Third, in the case of SCI, patents, the performance of government-affiliated and universities, is generally higher than the National Institute. Fourth,fundingon new technologies ofIT sector showed higher performance than SCI and Patents. Finally, rural variables have higher commercialization performance in other regions than Seoul, Incheon, and Gyeonggi. Conclusion: This suggests that Government R&D should continue to be supported. Also, the government R&D support on Government-affiliated and universities plays a positive role. Our findings suggest that Government R&D funding should be concentrated on technology characteristics. As well as, Government R&D funding should take regional characteristics into account when considering commercialization performance.
참고문헌 (25)
- Park Bo-seok, "Enterprise SECURITY Management for IoT Services Based on Event Correlation in Republic of KOREA", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 3(1), pp.17~24 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Dongwon Kim, "Government Roles in Policy Networks against COVID-19: Comparing Two Cases in S. Korea", Protection Convergence, 5(2), pp.14~26 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Griliches Z, "The Search for R&D Spillovers", The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, pp.29~47 (1992)
- 박철민, "연구개발단계별 연구개발투자와 논문 성과 간의 시차효과 분석: 국가연구개발사업을 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 19(4), pp.687~710 (2016), 한국기술혁신학회
- 송종국, "R&D 투자 촉진을 위한 재정지원정책의 효과분석", 기술혁신연구, 17(1), pp.1~48 (2009), 기술경영경제학회
- 곽태완, "기업특성에 따른 연구개발비의 가치관련성에 관한 연구", 국제회계연구, (50), pp.159~182 (2013), 한국국제회계학회[DOI]
- 오세홍, "국내 연구개발투자와 경제성장간의 인과관계", 기술혁신연구, 10(1), pp.65~82 (2002), 기술경영경제학회
- 장금영, "연구개발투자의 성과에 영향을 미치는요인에 관한 연구 : 정부의 산업기술개발사업을 중심으로", 기술혁신연구, 18(1), pp.75~98 (2010), 기술경영경제학회
- An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Public Funding on the Academic Patent, "Jang D", Korea Institute of Intellectual Property(KIIP), ~ (2013)
- Development of Methodology for the Analysis of Productivity on Investment of Public R&D, "Jang J", Science & Technology Policy Institute, ~, pp.Policy Research 2001-24 (2001)
- 박석종, "과학기술적 성과 관점에서 정부 R&D사업 효율성 분석에 관한 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 14(2), pp.205~222 (2011), 한국기술혁신학회
- 심우중, "우리나라 국가연구개발사업 정부연구비 투입 대비 성과의 다각적 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 13(1), pp.1~27 (2010), 한국기술혁신학회
- Griliches Z, "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey", Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), pp.287~343 (1990)
- Arundel A, "What Percentage of Innovations are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms", Research Policy, 27(2), pp.127~141 (1998)
- Archibugi D, "Trade, Growth and Technical Change" (1998), Cambridge University
- Romijn H, "Determinants of Innovation Capability in Small Electronics and Software Firms in Southeast England", Research Policy, 31(77), pp.1053~1067 (2002)
- Griliches Z, "R&D, Patents and Productivity" (2007), University of Chicago
- 윤영준, "정부 연구개발(R&D) 지원사업으로 획득한 특허의 피인용 성과 영향요인 분석 -기업의 정부 R&D 특허 성과분석을 중심으로-", 지식재산연구, 12(1), pp.183~212 (2017), 한국지식재산연구원[DOI]
- 이방래, "개별 논문의 질적 수준에서 측정한 과학기술분야 기초연구사업의 SCI 성과 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 19(9), pp.11~25 (2019), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 이종호, "정부R&D지원이 중견기업 성과에 미치는 영향: 대기업, 중견기업, 중소기업 간 비교를 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 24(2), pp.139~160 (2021), 한국기술혁신학회[DOI]
- 박창일, "6T 분야별 국가 R&D사업의 효율성과 생산성변화", 산업경제연구, 31(1), pp.293~325 (2018), 한국산업경제학회[DOI]
- 오동훈, "상대적순위보정지수(R2nIF)를 활용한 주요국의 SCI 논문 질적 수준 비교분석", 기술혁신연구, 21(1), pp.85~108 (2013), 기술경영경제학회
- Shin Woo-ri, "The Importance of Education and Training of Local Government's DISASTER Management Public Servants", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 2(2), pp.1~3 (2017), J-INSTITUTE
- Sa Yong-jin, "Human Capital Management CRISIS for Indefinite-Term Contract Workers in Local Governments: Focusing on Education & Training and Performance", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 5(1), pp.1~12 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Yang Luo, "Directions for the Korean Social INTEGRATION Policy Index Development", Public Value, 6(1), pp.62~71 (2021), J-INSTITUTE