바이러스저항성 삼각주 재배가 토양 미생물상에 미치는 영향
Impact of Virus-resistant Trigonal Cactus Cultivation on Soil Microbial Community
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
BACKGROUND: Genetically modified(GM) trigonal cactus(Hylocereus trigonus Saff.) contained a coat protein gene of cactus virus X (CVX), which conferred resistance to the virus, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (bar) gene,which conferred herbicide resistance, and a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (CaMV 35S). This study was conducted to evaluate the possible impact of GM trigonal cactus cultivation on the soil microbial community. METHODS AND RESULTS: Microorganisms were isolated from the rhizosphere of GM and non-GM trigonal cactus cultivation soils. The total numbers of bacteria, and actinomycete in the rhizosphere soils cultivated GM and non-GM trigonal cactus were similar to each other, and there was no significant difference. Dominant bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soils cultivated with GM and non-GM trigonal cactus were Proteobacteria, Uncultured archaeon, and Uncultured bacterium. The denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles show a similar patterns, significant difference was not observed in each other. DNA was isolated from soil cultivated GM and non-GM trigonal cactus, we analyzed the persistence of the inserted gene by PCR. Amplification of the inserted genes was not observed in the soil DNA, which was collected after harvest. CONCLUSION(S): This result suggests that the GM trigonal cactus cultivation does not change significantly the microbial community.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetically modified(GM) trigonal cactus(Hylocereus trigonus Saff.) contained a coat protein gene of cactus virus X (CVX), which conferred resistance to the virus, phosphinothricin acetyltransferase (bar) gene,which conferred herbicide resistance, and a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (CaMV 35S). This study was conducted to evaluate the possible impact of GM trigonal cactus cultivation on the soil microbial community. METHODS AND RESULTS: Microorganisms were isolated from the rhizosphere of GM and non-GM trigonal cactus cultivation soils. The total numbers of bacteria, and actinomycete in the rhizosphere soils cultivated GM and non-GM trigonal cactus were similar to each other, and there was no significant difference. Dominant bacterial phyla in the rhizosphere soils cultivated with GM and non-GM trigonal cactus were Proteobacteria, Uncultured archaeon, and Uncultured bacterium. The denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles show a similar patterns, significant difference was not observed in each other. DNA was isolated from soil cultivated GM and non-GM trigonal cactus, we analyzed the persistence of the inserted gene by PCR. Amplification of the inserted genes was not observed in the soil DNA, which was collected after harvest. CONCLUSION(S): This result suggests that the GM trigonal cactus cultivation does not change significantly the microbial community.
참고문헌 (21)
- Badosa, E., "Lack of detection of ampicillin resistance gene transfer from Bt176 transgenic corn to culturable bacteria under field conditions", FEMS microbiology ecology, 48, pp.169~178 (2004)
- Brookes, G., "Global impact of biotech crops: Socio-economic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use", AgBioForum, 9, pp.139~151 (2006)
- Conner, A. J., "The release of genetically modified crops into the environment; Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment", Plant J, 33, pp.19~46 (2003)
- Filion, M., "Do transgenic plants affect rhizobacteria populations?", Microb. Biotechnol, 1, pp.463~475 (2008)
- Germida, J. J., "Impact of genetically modified crops on soil-and plant-associated microbial communities", J. Environ. Qual, 33, pp.806~815 (2004)
- Hsieh, Y. T., "Influence of planting papaya ringspot virus resistant transgenic papaya on soil microbial biodiversity", J. Agric. Food Chem, 54, pp.130~137 (2006)
- Global Status of Commercialized Biotech, "GM Crops: 2012", James, C., 2012, ISAAA Brief No. 44
- Jung, H., "Biosafety white paper", pp.315~328 (2011), Korea research institute of bioscience and biotechnology
- Kardol, P., "Temporal variation in plant-soil feedback controls succession", Ecol. Lett, 9, pp.1080~1088 (2006)
- Kim, Min-Cheol, "Molecular Analysis of Bacterial Community Structures in Paddy Soils forEnvironmental Risk Assessment with Two Varieties of Genetically ModifiedRice, Iksan 483 and Milyang 204", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18(2), pp.207~218 (2008), 한국미생물·생명공학회
- Konig, A., "Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops", Food Chem. Toxicol, 42, pp.1047~1088 (2004)
- 이현행, "유럽 표준분석법과 농촌진흥청 표준분석법에 의한 원예용 상토의 화학성 비교 분석", 원예과학기술지, 24(3), pp.425~430 (2006), 한국원예학회
- Lorenz, M. G., "Mechanism of retarded DNA degradation and prokaryotic origin of DNases in nonsterile soils", Syst. Appl. Microbiol, 20, pp.513~521 (1997)
- Miethling, R., "Variation of microbial rhizosphere communities in response to crop species, soil origin, and inoculation with Sinorhizobium meliloti L33", Microbial. Ecol, 40, pp.43~56 (2000)
- Methods of analysis of soil and plant, "NIAST", National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, ~ (2000)
- OECD, "Safety assessment of transgenic organisms, Volume 4: OECD Consensus Documents", 171~174 (2010)
- Owen, M. D. K., "Current use of transgenic herbicideresistant soybean and corn in the USA", Crop Prot, 19, pp.765~771 (2000)
- Sharma, S., "Characterization of bacterial community structure in rhizosphere soil of grain legumes", Microbial. Ecol, 49, pp.407~415 (2005)
- Smalla, K., "Monitoring field releases of genetically modified sugar beets for persistence of transgenic plant DNA and horizontal gene transfer", Fems Microbiol. Ecol, 28, pp.261~272 (1999)
- Wei, X. D., "Field released transgenic papaya affects microbial communities and enzyme activities in soil", Plant and soil, 285, pp.347~358 (2006)
- Widmer, F., "Quantification of transgenic plant marker gene persistence in the field", Mol. Ecol, 6, pp.1~7 (1997)