본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국제특허분류(IPC) 공동출현 네트워크 분석을 통해 살펴본 기업의 지식융합 특성이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향 : 전자통신산업 중소기업을 중심으로

The effect of knowledge convergence characteristics on firm’s innovation performance via International Patent Classification(IPC) co-occurrence network analysis - Focused on Electricity and Electronic SMEs-

송창현|김연배|이민정
한국지식재산연구원 (Korea Institute of Intellectual Property)|2018.03|지식재산연구 (Journal of Intellectual Property)|제13권 제1호|pp. 245-284|DOI http://doi.org/10.34122/jip.2018.03.13.1.245

0

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

특허네트워크 분석Network analysisPatents지식융합활용 및 탐험IPC 공동출현Knowledge convergenceExploitation & ExplorationIPC co-occurrence

초록

최근 국내 전자통신 산업에서 지식과 기술 단위에서의 융합이 활발히 일어나고 있다. 이 같은 변화는 산업의 대부분을 차지하고 있는 중소기업들에게 엄청난 위협인 동시에 새로운 기회로 작용하고 있다. 특히 기존 지식과새로운 지식의 역할이 중요한데, 본 연구에서는 이들 지식 사이의 융합이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향에 주목하고 있다. IPC 공동출현 네트워크 개념을 활용하여 기업의 지식융합 특성을 ‘활용적’, ‘탐험적’ 그리고 ‘분산적’으로 구분하고, 이러한 특성들이 각각 활용적, 탐험적 혁신성과에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지에 대해 실증분석을 실시하였다. 이를 위해 NICE 평가정보에서 제공하는 한국표준산업분류(KSIC-9)(9차개정) 중 26(전자부품, 컴퓨터, 영상, 음향 및통신장비 제조업)과 28(전기장비 제조업)을 전자통신 산업으로 간주하고, 해당분류에 속한 중소기업들의 자료를 수집하였다. 분석 결과, 활용적인 지식융합은 활용적, 탐험적 혁신성과에 유의미한 영향을 주지 못하는 반면 탐험적지식융합은 활용적, 탐험적 혁신성과 모두 양(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 분산적 지식융합은 활용적 혁신성과에는 긍정적인 영향을 주나, 탐험적 혁신성과에는 영향을 주지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 기업들은 한정된 자원 하에서 자신의 지식융합 특성을 파악하여 전략적으로 혁신을 추구할 필요가 있다는 전략적 시사점을 도출하였다.

Abstract

Recently, convergence in knowledge and technology has been active in domestic electronics & telecommunication industry. These changes provide great opportunities as well as big threat to small and medium-sized enterprises(SMEs) which consist the most of the industry. In particular, since the role of existing and new knowledge is important, this study focus on the effect of convergence between these knowledge on innovation performance. Using IPC co-occurrence network, firms’ knowledge convergence characteristics can be divided into three types: ‘exploitative’ knowledge convergence, ‘exploratory’ knowledge convergence and ‘dispersive’ knowledge convergence. And how each characteristic affects exploitative and exploratory innovation is empirically analyzed. KSIC(Korea Standard Industrial Classification, 9th edition) code 26 and code 28 provided by the NICE Information Service are considered as a electronics & telecommunication industries. The results show that exploratory knowledge convergence has a significant and positive effect on exploitative and exploratory innovation each. And the dispersive knowledge convergence has only effect on exploitative innovation. Meanwhile the exploitative knowledge convergence has no significant effect on exploitative and exploratory innovation. According to these results, firms should recognize their characteristics of knowledge convergence and strategically pursue innovation with their limited resources.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. 한치록, "계량경제학 강의" (2017), 박영사
  2. Greene, W. H., "Econometric Analysis" (2012), Pearson Education Limited
  3. Hill, R. C., "Principles of Econometrics" (2011), John Wiley & Sons Inc
  4. Narayanan, V. K., "Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage" (2000), Pearson
  5. 김효정, "활용(Exploitation)과 탐험(Exploration)에 대한 실증연구 결과가 제기하는 개념적 이슈와 향후 연구과제", 전략경영연구, 13(3), pp.1~34 (2010), 한국전략경영학회[DOI]
  6. 박상문, "탐험과 활용의 혁신전략과 연구개발조직이 중소기업의 기술혁신에 미치는 영향", 기술혁신학회지, 11(1), pp.118~143 (2008), 한국기술혁신학회
  7. 추기능, "출원인 인용 대 심사관 인용 - 한국 특허청 등록특허를 이용한 결정요인 분석 -", 지식재산연구, 6(4), pp.209~241 (2011), 한국지식재산연구원[DOI]
  8. 하성욱, "활용과 탐험이 경영성과에 미치는 영향: 전자부품 중소기업을 중심으로", 경영학연구, 39(4), pp.907~937 (2010), 한국경영학회
  9. Ahuja, G., "Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions", Strategic management journal, 22(6-7) (2001)
  10. Auh, S., "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity", Journal of Business Research, 58(12) (2005)
  11. Belderbos, R., "Technological activities and their impact on the financial performance of the firm: Exploitation and exploration within and between firms", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6) (2010)
  12. Benner, M. J., "Process management and technological innovation:A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries", Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4) (2002)
  13. Bierly, P. E., "Dynamic knowledge strategies and industry fusion", International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 3(1, pp.2) (2001), ~
  14. Bierly, P. E., "Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4) (2007)
  15. Cassiman, B., "R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium", The American Economic Review, 92(4) (2002)
  16. Castellacci, F., "Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth", Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(6) (2007)
  17. Cohen, W. M., "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1) (1990)
  18. Criscuolo, P., "Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents", Research Policy, 37(10) (2008)
  19. Curran, C., "Patent indicators for monitoring convergence — examples from NFF and ICT", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2) (2011)
  20. Dosi, G., "Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change", Research Policy, 11(3) (1982)
  21. Ernst, H., "Patent information for strategic technology management", World Patent Information, 25(3) (2003)
  22. Fleming, L., "Finding the organizational sources of technological breakthroughs:the story of Hewlett-Packard’s thermal ink-jet", Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(5) (2002)
  23. Fontana, R., "Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(4) (2008)
  24. Freeman, L. C., "Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results", Social Networks, 2(2) (1979)
  25. Galende, J., "Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour", Research Policy, 32(5) (2003)
  26. Gemba, K., "Diversification dynamics of the Japanese industry", Research Policy, 30(8) (2001)
  27. George, G., "The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: A study of biotechnology firms", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2) (2001)
  28. 금영정, "Technological Convergence of IT and BT: Evidence from Patent Analysis", ETRI Journal, 34(3), pp.439~449 (2012), 한국전자통신연구원
  29. Gilsing, V., "Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density", Research Policy, 37(10) (2008)
  30. Granstrand, O., "Towards a theory of the technology-based firm", Research Policy, 27(5) (1998)
  31. Greene, W. H., "Functional forms for the negative binomial model for count data", Economics Letters, 99(3) (2008)
  32. Market value and patent citations: A first look, "Hall, B. H.", ~, pp.NBER Working Paper Series, No.7741 (2000)
  33. He, Z, L., "Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis", Organization Science, 15(4) (2004)
  34. Hu, A. G., "Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(6) (2003)
  35. Jacquemin, A. P., "Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth", The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27(4) (1979)
  36. Joo, S. H., "Measuring relatedness between technological fields", Scientometrics, 83(2) (2010)
  37. Katila, R., "Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction", Academy of Management Journal, 45(6) (2002)
  38. Kim, C., "Identifying core environmental technologies through patent analysis", Innovation, 17(1) (2015)
  39. Kim, M. S., "On a patent analysis method for technological convergence", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40 (2012)
  40. Kondo, M., "R&D dynamics of creating patents in the Japanese industry", Research Policy, 28(6) (1999)
  41. Kuemmerle, W., "Optimal scale for research and development in foreign environments — an investigation into size and performance of research and development laboratories abroad", Research Policy, 27(2) (1998)
  42. Lai, K. K., "Using the patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system", Information Processing & Management, 41(2) (2005)
  43. Levinthal, D. A., "The myopia of learning", Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2) (1993)
  44. Lin, B. W., "Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms", R&D Management, 35(2) (2005)
  45. March, J. G., "Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning", Organization Science, 2(1) (1991)
  46. Molero, J., "Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region", Research Policy, 25(4) (1996)
  47. Phelps, C., "Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda", Journal of Management, 38(4) (2012)
  48. Prodan, I., "Influence of research and development expenditures on number of patent applications: Selected case studies in OECD countries and Central Europe, 1981-2001", Applied Econometrics and International Development, 5(4) (2005)
  49. Quintana-García, C., "Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification", Research Policy, 37(3) (2008)
  50. Suzuki, J., "Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms", Research Policy, 33(3) (2004)
  51. Teece, D. J., "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7) (1997)
  52. Trajtenberg, M., "A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations", The RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1) (1990)
  53. Tsai, K. H., "R&D productivity and firm size: a nonlinear examination", Technovation, 25(7) (2005)
  54. Uotila, J., "Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations", Strategic Management Journal, 30(2) (2009)
  55. Voss, G. B., "The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation", Academy of Management Journal, 51(1) (2008)
  56. Yoon, B., "A text-mining based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend", Journal of High Technology Management Research, 15(1) (2004)
  57. 정성도, "A study of a patent network with respect to structural density and diversity-Sector, firm and country level exploration", 박사, pp.2015
  58. Schoen, A., "The network structure of technological developments : Technological distance as a walk on the technology map", Science & Technology Indicators Conference (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

특허 인용 네트워크 분석을 통한 기술지식의 확산 경로 분석: 정보통신기술을 중심으로김명숙, 백현미, 최병철한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2015 · 제10권 제1호기업의 기술융합 성과수준이 경영성과에 끼치는 영향김영준, 장진찬한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2021 · 제22권 제2호특허 네트워크와 전략지표 분석을 통한 기업 기술융합 전략 연구김의석, 조용래한국지식재산연구원 · 지식재산연구2014 · 제9권 제4호공동 특허 출원인간 협력 요인이 기술혁신성과에 미치는 영향 분석: 우리나라 정보통신업을 중심으로서환주, 주성환기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2017 · 제25권 제4호특허인용관계를 활용한 산업융합 파급효과 연구강희종, 김기국기술경영경제학회 · 기술혁신연구2014 · 제22권 제2호특허 네트워크 분석을 통한 기술융합 및 융합기술의 확산 연구 —디지털 데이터 처리 기술 중심으로—전상규한국지식재산연구원 · 지식재산연구2021 · 제16권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

특허법상 손해배상액 산정에 있어서 기여도 증명책임의 소재주현재, 정차호, WEN LIHUApp. 1-52미국 특허법상 소프트웨어 발명의 특허대상적격성강기봉pp. 53-90미국 특허침해소송 재판적에 대한 법리의 역사적 전개과정 : 미국 연방대법원 TC Heartland 판결을 중심으로이주환pp. 91-142군 장병 등의 직무발명 판단기준에 관한 연구오창석, 박송기pp. 143-180응용미술저작물의 분리가능성 요건에 대한 소고 : Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands 판결에 대한 평석박재원pp. 181-218
원문 보기