본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

康有为的书法艺术硏究

The Study of Calligraphy of Kang Youwei

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

康有为(1858∼1927)是晚清到中华民国时期重要的思想家,政治家,杰 出的书法家和教育家。他从小就学习经学,受藏书家祖父的影响从小就 博览群书。19岁师从同乡大学者朱次琦,陶醉于陆九渊与王守仁的思想。 后对西洋自然科学和社会科学产生了浓厚的兴趣,开始致力于政治改革。 他举起了反对传统的因习、朱子学的权威主义、科举制度的大旗。就变法 的必要性七次向光绪皇帝上书,是“戊戌变法”的主导者,失败后逃亡海外 16年。 他平生的著作大部分都保留了下来。早年学习欧阳询,风骨劲拔。又于 北京力学六朝碑版,后又抛弃唐人,取法北碑。故他字体在严谨的法度中 又有了变化和创新,形成了自己独创的风格。特中国近代书法史上广为 流传的他的书论《广艺舟双楫》,给清代后期到近现代的书法界,产生了重 大的影响。《广艺舟双楫》详细阐述了康有为的书学思想,被评为中国书 法史上最系统的书法理论著作。同时为中国近现代书法史上‘碑学’开启 中兴时代做出了很大的贡献。他的书法和书学理论对近现代中国书法的 发展有着极其深远的影响。 本文对康有为的“书法实践”进行分析,并记述和他主张的书法理论的 关系。这种理论和思想之间内在的联系与外在的矛盾并存。因此本文致 力于对康有为书学思想的脉络进行一定的分析。换句话说,本文不仅讨 论康有为的《广艺舟双楫》的界限,也对其中晚期书学理念的变化及其书 学理论和实践的矛盾进行分析。并且,以康有为书法作品的技法和风格 等为基底,归纳、梳理他书法理论思想的脉络,进行综合评价。康有为主张运笔要方圆兼用,特别是他的行书充满了北碑的意趣,笔画 和骨力刚毅,笔势欹側險絕,蕴含浑厚、雄强、峻美之气。康有为在结体中 通过“體方筆厚,畫平豎直”体现出了书法拙厚的形态。因此他书法的结 体中出现了很多 ‘橫勢體方’,端正寬博,自然不做作。章法布局跌宕起伏, 交错在一起,意趣盎然,奔放洒脱。以此可看出康有为书法‘以氣為勝,以 力為美’的独特风格。他晚年的书法大体上是碑帖融合。尤其是行草书的用笔方面开始显现出很强的个性。他的行草书源于魏碑,兼具篆隶,将章 草注入帖学等多种书体融合在一起。骨力筋健、血肉丰满,意態不只高 古,篆意鲜明,书写节奏快慢有序,停匀得当。 康有为的很多著述和書法作品被保留下来。从这些庞大的资料里对他 书法作品和書學理论进行分析并不是简单的事情。本文不足之处,请各 位前辈、读者们不吝指正。

Abstract

Kang Youwei(康有爲) was a philosopher, politician, accomplished calligrapher and an educator of the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China. He started the study of Confucian classics in early childhood, and read numerous books influenced by his grandfather who was a bibliophile. At age 19, he began to study under a great scholar Ju Chaki (朱次琦. 1807∼1881), and immersed himself in the philosophy of Yuk Guyeon (陸九淵) and Wang Suin (王守仁). He also developed keen interest in natural science and sociology of the west, and harbored great ambition for political reforms. He opposed conventional customs, neo-Confucian authoritarianism, and requirements of the state examination. He submitted an appeal to change the law to Guangxu Emperor seven times, and led the initiative for ‘Musulbyeonbeop (戊戌變法)’, but as it failed, he became an overseas exile for 16 years. He wrote many well-known books, and became a renowned calligrapher of a punggolgyeongbal (风骨勁拔) style that he learned from calligraphy work of Gu Yangsun (歐陽詢). After broadly experiencing yukjobipan (六朝碑版), he abandoned dangin (唐人) and pursued bukbi (北碑) instead. As a result, his calligraphy expresses changes and originality even within a rigorous format, and he reached an original height of his own. In particular, his book ‘Gwanyejussangjeup (廣藝舟雙楫)’, which compiled his theory of bihak (碑学), had a great influence on the world of calligraphy. His calligraphy and theory on calligraphy contributed to advancement of modern calligraphy immensely. In this article, we examined Kang Youwei’s practice of calligraphy and examine its relationship with his theory on calligraphy. Between his ideas and philosophy are found both inherent connection and inherent contradiction. Going beyond discussing limitations of ‘Gwangyejussang jeup’, we also explored how his theory changed in the middle and later periods, as well as contradictions between his theory and practice. Additionally, we attempted to organize contexts of his theory on calligraphy based on the technique and style of his work for comprehensive evaluation. In brush strokes, Kang Youwei advocated use of both straight and curved lines. Particularly, his haengseo (行书) style contains disposition of bukbi (北碑), has strong strokes and bone structures, and exudes an air of strength and beauty due to slanted and steep strokes. His gyeolche (结体) expresses a thick and somewhat wanting shape with massive and heavy strokes. His work maintains tidy, generous, natural and artless style. His jangbeop (章法) has an irregular charm with cheerful, indulgent and valiant air. Combining these, his calligraphy creates a unique air of ‘winning with style and creating beauty with power (以氣為勝以力為美)’. In his later years, convergence of bihak and cheophak was notable in his work. Particularly, his haengchoseo (行草书) style began to show strong personality with a mixture of various styles as it stemmed from wibi (魏碑), added elements of jeonye (篆隶), and evolved into jangcho (章草) and cheophak (帖学). Kang Youwei left numerous writings and works of calligraphy. It is difficult to examine and assess his works of calligraphy and theories due to immense amount of materials. We look forward to suggestions to correct and revise this article from distinguished scholars and readers alike.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 李凯莉, "康有为书法理论研究", 硕士, pp.2017
  2. 范国强, "康有为书法硏究" (2014), 西泠印社出版社
  3. 尹 旭, "中国书法美学史" (2014), 山西教育出版社
  4. 郭建党, "沈曾植康有为书法比较研究", 硕士, pp.2013
  5. 康有为, "万木草堂论艺" (2011), 荣宝斋出版社
  6. 伍永忠, "康有为美学思想研究", 博士, pp.2011
  7. 康有为, "广艺舟双楫" (2010), 中国人民大学出版社
  8. 劉兆彬, "康有为书法美学思想硏究", 博士, pp.2010
  9. 李建宇, "康有为书法思想与艺术实践的错位", 硕士, pp.2010
  10. 李永彻, "行书僿说" (2010)
  11. 谷万里, "康有为书法理论价值探析" (2009)
  12. 王镇远, "中国书法理论史" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
  13. 王镇远, "中国书法理论史" (2009), 上海古籍出版社
  14. 姜义华, "康有为全集(第一至十二集)" (2007), 中国人民大学出版社
  15. 马洪林, "康有为集" (2006), 珠海出版社
  16. 丛文俊, "揭示古典的真实——丛文俊书学、学术研究论集" (2003), 中州古籍出版社
  17. 李永彻, "殷商西周甲骨文与金文的书艺术硏究", 博士, pp.2000
  18. 刘恒, "中国书法史』(清代卷)" (1999), 江苏教育出版社
  19. 康有为, "康南海自编年谱" (1992), 中华书局
  20. 江 如, "康有为书法审美理论管窥", 四川师范大学学报, (4) (1991)
  21. 欧阳中石, "书论会要" (1990), 高等教育出版社
  22. 孔祥吉, "康有为变法奏议研究" (1988), 辽宁教育出版社
  23. 崔尔平, "广艺舟双楫注" (1981), 上海书画出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)