The Adequacy of a Conventional Mechanical Ventilator as a Ventilation Method during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Manikin Study
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: We conducted this study to verify whether a mechanical ventilator is adequate for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: A self-inflating bag resuscitator and a mechanical ventilator were used to test two experimental models: Model 1 (CPR manikin without chest compression) and Model 2 (CPR manikin with chest compression). Model 2 was divided into three subgroups according to ventilator pressure limits (Plimit). The self-inflating bag resuscitator was set with a ventilation rate of 10 breaths/min with the volume-marked bag-valve procedure. The mode of the mechanical ventilator was set as follows: volume-controlled mandatory ventilation of tidal volume (Vt) 600 mL, an inspiration time of 1.2 seconds, a constant flow pattern, a ventilation rate of 10 breaths/ minute, a positive end expiratory pressure of 3 cmH2O and a maximum trigger limit. Peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and Vt were measured by a flow analyzer. Ventilation adequacy was determined at a Vt range of 400-600 mL with a Ppeak of ≤ 50 cmH2O. Results: In Model 1, Vt and Ppeak were in the appropriate range in the ventilation equipments. In Model 2, for the self-inflating bag resuscitator, the adequate Vt and Ppeak levels were 17%, and the Ppeak adequacy was 20% and the Vt was 65%. For the mechanical ventilator, the adequate Vt and Ppeak levels were 85%; the Ppeak adequacy was 85%; and the Vt adequacy was 100% at 60 cmH2O of Plimit. Conclusions: In a manikin model, a mechanical ventilator was superior to self-inflating bag resuscitator for maintaining adequate ventilation during chest compression.
Abstract
Background: We conducted this study to verify whether a mechanical ventilator is adequate for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: A self-inflating bag resuscitator and a mechanical ventilator were used to test two experimental models: Model 1 (CPR manikin without chest compression) and Model 2 (CPR manikin with chest compression). Model 2 was divided into three subgroups according to ventilator pressure limits (Plimit). The self-inflating bag resuscitator was set with a ventilation rate of 10 breaths/min with the volume-marked bag-valve procedure. The mode of the mechanical ventilator was set as follows: volume-controlled mandatory ventilation of tidal volume (Vt) 600 mL, an inspiration time of 1.2 seconds, a constant flow pattern, a ventilation rate of 10 breaths/ minute, a positive end expiratory pressure of 3 cmH2O and a maximum trigger limit. Peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and Vt were measured by a flow analyzer. Ventilation adequacy was determined at a Vt range of 400-600 mL with a Ppeak of ≤ 50 cmH2O. Results: In Model 1, Vt and Ppeak were in the appropriate range in the ventilation equipments. In Model 2, for the self-inflating bag resuscitator, the adequate Vt and Ppeak levels were 17%, and the Ppeak adequacy was 20% and the Vt was 65%. For the mechanical ventilator, the adequate Vt and Ppeak levels were 85%; the Ppeak adequacy was 85%; and the Vt adequacy was 100% at 60 cmH2O of Plimit. Conclusions: In a manikin model, a mechanical ventilator was superior to self-inflating bag resuscitator for maintaining adequate ventilation during chest compression.
참고문헌 (27)
- McInnes AD, "The first quantitative report of ventilation rate during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents", Resuscitation, 82, pp.1025~1029 (2011)
- Aufderheide TP, "Death by hyperventilation:a common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Crit Care Med, 32(9Suppl), pp.S345~S351 (2004)
- Park SO, "A clinical observational study analysing the factors associated with hyperventilation during actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department", Resuscitation, 84, pp.298~303 (2013)
- Kern KB, "Metronome improves compression and ventilation rates during CPR on a manikin in a randomized trial", Resuscitation, 81, pp.206~210 (2010)
- Abella BS, "CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system", Resuscitation, 73, pp.54~61 (2007)
- Edelson DP, "Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing", Arch Intern Med, 168, pp.1063~1069 (2008)
- Edelson DP, "Capnography and chest-wall impedance algorithms for ventilation detection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Resuscitation, 81, pp.317~322 (2010)
- Maertens VL, "Patients with cardiac arrest are ventilated two times faster than guidelines recommend: an observational prehospital study using tracheal pressure measurement", Resuscitation, 84, pp.921~926 (2013)
- O’Neill JF, "Do we hyperventilate cardiac arrest patients?", Resuscitation, 73, pp.82~85 (2007)
- Weiss SJ, "Automatic transport ventilator versus bag valve in the EMS setting: a prospective, randomized trial", South Med J, 98, pp.970~976 (2005)
- Johannigman JA, "Out-of-hospital ventilation: bag--valve device vs transport ventilator", Acad Emerg Med, 2, pp.719~724 (1995)
- Salas N, "Comparison of ventilation and cardiac compressions using the Impact Model 730 automatic transport ventilator compared to a conventional bag valve with a facemask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest", Resuscitation, 74, pp.94~101 (2007)
- Cho YC, "How can a single rescuer adequately deliver tidal volume with a manual resuscitator? An improved device for delivering regular tidal volume", Emerg Med J, 28, pp.40~43 (2011)
- Wenzel V, "Effects of smaller tidal volumes during basic life support ventilation in patients with respiratory arrest: good ventilation, less risk?", Resuscitation, 43, pp.25~29 (1999)
- Dörges V, "Smaller tidal volumes with room-air are not sufficient to ensure adequate oxygenation during bag-valve-mask ventilation", Resuscitation, 44, pp.37~41 (2000)
- Dörges V, "Optimisation of tidal volumes given with self-inflatable bags without additional oxygen", Resuscitation, 43, pp.195~199 (2000)
- Neumar RW, "Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care", Circulation, 122(18 Suppl 3), pp.S729~S767 (2010)
- Langhelle A, "Arterial bloodgases with 500- versus 1000-ml tidal volumes during out-of-hospital CPR", Resuscitation, 45, pp.27~33 (2000)
- Dorph E, "Arterial blood gases with 700 mL tidal volumes during out-of-hospital CPR", Resuscitation, 61, pp.23~27 (2004)
- Yannopoulos D, "Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of 15:2 and 30:2 compressionto-ventilation ratios for cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Crit Care Med, 34, pp.1444~1449 (2006)
- Yannopoulos D, "Reducing ventilation frequency combined with an inspiratory impedance device improves CPR efficiency in swine model of cardiac arrest", Resuscitation, 61, pp.75~82 (2004)
- Aufderheide TP, "Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Circulation, 109, pp.1960~1965 (2004)
- Yannopoulos D, "Reducing ventilation frequency during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest", Respir Care, 50, pp.628~635 (2005)
- Deakin CD, "European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4. Adult advanced life support", Resuscitation, 81, pp.1305~1352 (2010)
- Theres H, "Phase-related changes in right ventricular cardiac output under volume-controlled mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure", Crit Care Med, 27, pp.953~958 (1999)
- Karlsson T, "Central and regional blood flow during hyperventilation. An experimental study in the pig", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 38, pp.180~186 (1994)
- Cheifetz IM, "Increasing tidal volumes and pulmonary overdistention adversely affect pulmonary vascular mechanics and cardiac output in a pediatric swine model", Crit Care Med, 26, pp.710~716 (1998)