기관내 삽관 후 백 압착법에 따른 호흡량 비교
Comparison of tidal volume of two different bag squeezing techniques in endotracheal intubation settings
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: There is no recommended bag-squeezing technique for emergency medical providers to maintain correct tidal volume during mechanical ventilation. This study compared the tidal volume of two different bag-squeezing techniques during mechanical ventilation. Methods: The subjects were 38 paramedic students who were trained in airway management techniques. Two different bag-squeezing techniques were used with a bag valve mask on an intubated manikin: a conventional technique and a finger-marked, in which the bag is squeezed until the thumb and the middle finger come into contact. Hand size and grip strength were measured and analyzed statistically. Results: The mean tidal volumes for the finger-marked were significantly higher than those for the conventional technique (542.6±35.92 mL versus 338.0±111.15 mL, p<.001). There was a correlation between the two techniques (Pearson χ2=1.160, p<.001). The subject’s characteristics, including sex, hand size, and grip strength, showed no correlation with tidal volume. Conclusion: A finger-marked bag-squeezing technique provides adequate and correct tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation.
Abstract
Purpose: There is no recommended bag-squeezing technique for emergency medical providers to maintain correct tidal volume during mechanical ventilation. This study compared the tidal volume of two different bag-squeezing techniques during mechanical ventilation. Methods: The subjects were 38 paramedic students who were trained in airway management techniques. Two different bag-squeezing techniques were used with a bag valve mask on an intubated manikin: a conventional technique and a finger-marked, in which the bag is squeezed until the thumb and the middle finger come into contact. Hand size and grip strength were measured and analyzed statistically. Results: The mean tidal volumes for the finger-marked were significantly higher than those for the conventional technique (542.6±35.92 mL versus 338.0±111.15 mL, p<.001). There was a correlation between the two techniques (Pearson χ2=1.160, p<.001). The subject’s characteristics, including sex, hand size, and grip strength, showed no correlation with tidal volume. Conclusion: A finger-marked bag-squeezing technique provides adequate and correct tidal volumes during mechanical ventilation.
참고문헌 (19)
- 조병준, "심정지 환자의 생존율에 미치는 영향요인", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 15(2), pp.760~766 (2014), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- 정상구, "일개 도에서 병원 외 심정지 환자의 병원 전 자발순환 회복과 관련된 요인들에 대한 고찰", 대한응급의학회지, 27(1), pp.98~106 (2016), 대한응급의학회
- Thomas D. Rea, "CPR with Chest Compression Alone or with Rescue Breathing", New England Journal of Medicine, 363(5), pp.423~433 (2010), New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM[DOI]
- F. Dumas, "Chest Compression Alone Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Associated With Better Long-Term Survival Compared with Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation", Circulation, 127(4), pp.435~441 (2013), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- T. Ogawa, "Outcomes of chest compression only CPR versus conventional CPR conducted by lay people in patients with out of hospital cardiopulmonary arrest witnessed by bystanders: nationwide population based observational study", BMJ, 342, pp.c7106~c7106 (2011), BMJ[DOI]
- T. Kitamura, "Bystander-Initiated Rescue Breathing for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests of Noncardiac Origin", Circulation, 122(3), pp.293~299 (2010), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Berg RA, "Simulated mouth-to-mouth ventilation and chest compressions (bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation) improves outcome in a swine model of prehospital pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest", Crit Care Med, 27(9), pp.1893~1899 (1999)
- Berg RA, "“Bystander” chest compressions and assisted ventilation independently improve outcome from piglet asphyxial pulseless “cardiac arrest”", Circulation, 101(14), pp.1743~1748 (2000)
- 신소연, "RespiTrainer를 활용한 백-밸브마스크 환기에서 일회호흡량과 기도압 비교 연구", 한국화재소방학회 논문지, 28(6), pp.76~81 (2014), 한국화재소방학회[DOI]
- Korean Association of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation., "2015 Korean guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care", 44~51 (2015)
- John F. O’Neill, "Do we hyperventilate cardiac arrest patients?", Resuscitation, 73(1), pp.82~85 (2007), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Grant V. Bochicchio, "Endotracheal Intubation in the Field Does Not Improve Outcome in Trauma Patients Who Present without an Acutely Lethal Traumatic Brain Injury", The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 54(2), pp.307~311 (2003), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Davis DP, "The impact of hypoxia and hyperventilation on outcome after paramedic rapid sequence intubation of severely head-injured patients", J Trauma, 57(1), pp.1~10 (2004)
- Davis DP, "The impact of prehospital endotracheal intubation on outcome in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury", J Trauma, 58(5), pp.933~939 (2005)
- Y. C. Cho, "How can a single rescuer adequately deliver tidal volume with a manual resuscitator? An improved device for delivering regular tidal volume", Emergency Medicine Journal, 28(1), pp.40~43 (2010), BMJ[DOI]
- 한수천, "가슴 압박 시행 중 기존의 수동식 소생기와 새로 고안된 수동식 소생기의 일회 호흡량 비교", 대한응급의학회지, 26(4), pp.269~275 (2015), 대한응급의학회
- Jin YH, "The effects of ventilation rate and characteristics of the hand on inspiratory oxygen concentration and tidal volume during bag-valve ventilation", J Korean Soc Emerg Med, 9(1), pp.7~13 (1998)
- 조승묵, "Bag-Valve-Mask의 사용방법에 따른 일회호흡량과 평균기도압의 변화 연구", 한국응급구조학회지, 16(2), pp.67~74 (2012), 사단법인 한국응급구조학회
- Thomas AN, "A new technique for two-hand bag-valve mask ventilation", Br J Anaesth, 69(4), pp.397~398 (1992)