대통령 임기 제도에 관한 연구
A Study on Presidential Term
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
Presidential term limits are important because they affect the link between the president and voters. Elections are normally considered to be one of the most important instrument for inducing governments to act in the interests of voters. Anticipating voters' future judgment of their past performance, presidents are induced to pursue the interests of voters in order to be re-elected. It is clear that if elections are to affect the behavior of presidents at all, voters must be able to punish incumbents who perform badly by throwing them out of office and to reward incumbents who perform well by giving them another term in office. But constitutional term limits break this link by preventing voters from rewarding good incumbents. The rationale for instituting the single term system for presidents in the first place is reasonable, for such system is meant to prevent incumbents from taking advantage of their position in order to remain in power. But there is no evidence that is available suggests that presidents do indeed have a large advantage when they are legally permitted to run for re-election. Even if we agree that the incumbency advantage of presidents needs to be tamed, the single term system for presidents may be too blunt an instrument because it fundamentally interferes with the relationship between voters and presidents and preempts the possibility that elections may operate as mechanisms of political accountability. Finally, I think that we need a constitutional amendment allowing presidents to serve two four-year terms instead of the current single five-year term.
참고문헌 (24)
- 강원택, "대통령제,내각제와 이원 정부제" (2006), 인간사랑
- 양 건, "새로운 헌법 필요한가" (2008), 대화문화아카데미
- 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2009), 박영사
- 김문현, "헌법개정의 기본방향", 공법연구, 34(4-2), pp.49~82 (2006), 한국공법학회
- 김종철, "대통령 4년 연임제 ‘원 포인트’ 개헌론에 대한 비판적 검토", 헌법학연구, 13(1), pp.61~105 (2007), 한국헌법학회
- 남복현, "현행헌법의 개정 필요성과 그 방향에 관한 논의의 법정책적 접근", 법과정책연구, 7(1), pp.117~143 (2007), 한국법정책학회
- 도회근, "헌법개정의 쟁점과 과제 ―공법학자 설문조사 결과분석―", 공법연구, 34(1), pp.49~72 (2005), 한국공법학회
- 송기춘, "政府形態와 國家競爭力-最近의 改憲論議와 관련하여-", 세계헌법연구, 11(1), pp.47~68 (2005), 세계헌법학회한국학회
- 신우철, "현행 대통령제에 관한 몇 가지 생각 : 우리 헌정사의 경험을 반추하면서", 서울대 법학, 41(1) (2000), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 이승우, "憲法改正의 必要性과 그에 따른 憲法改正의 方向", 공법학연구, 8(1), pp.29~56 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
- 임지봉, "헌법상 통치구조 개헌의 바람직한 방향과 내용", 세계헌법연구, 14(2), pp.207~226 (2008), 세계헌법학회한국학회
- 정태호, "대통령 임기제 개헌의 필요성과 정당성", 헌법학연구, 13(1), pp.1~60 (2007), 한국헌법학회
- Coppedge, Michael, "Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: A Study of the Quality and Stability of Venezuelan Democracy", 박사, pp.1988
- Cronin, Thomas E, "The State of the Presidency" (1980), Little Brown
- Johnson, Lyndon B, "The Vantage Point : Perspectives of the Presidency 1963～1969" (1971), Holt
- Page, Benjamin I, "The American Presidency" (1983), McGraw- Hill
- Przeworski,Adam, "Democracy and Accountability" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Robbers, Gerhard, "Encyclopedia of World Constitutions(Vol.Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ)" (2007), Facts on File
- Sartori, Giovanni, "Comparative Constitutional Engineering : An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes" (1997), New York University Press
- Shugart, Matthew Soberg, "Presidents and Assemblies : Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Buchanan, Bruce, "The Six-Year One Term Presidency : A New Lookatan Old Proposal", Presidential Studies Quarterly, 18, pp.129~ (1988)
- Burks, Edward C, "Carter Tells Editors He'd Limit Presidency to One Six-Year Term", New York Times, ~ (1979)
- Nice, David C, "In Retreat from Excellence : The Single Six-Year Presidential Term", Congress & the presidency, 13, pp.209~ (1986)
- Pear, Robert, "Bell Backs Single, Six-Year Term for President", Washington Star, Jan, 26 (1979)