통합대기환경지수를 고려한 지역개발 매력도 측정
Regional Development Attractiveness Measurement Considering the Comprehensive Air Quality Index
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recently, the relevance of the Air Quality Index considering major factors related to the air environment and the local economy and community was analyzed in abraod. In Korea, a comprehensive air-quality index has been proposed. In this study, the comprehensive air-quality index and the index that can integrate Gross Domestic Product per capita were summarized as regional attractiveness. As a result of the analysis, Ulsan, Chungnam, Seoul, Chungbuk, and Jeonnam had the highest Gross domestic product per capita, and Jeju, Gyeongnam, and Gyeongbuk had the best Comprehensive air-quality index, and Ulsan had the highest attractiveness. As a result of the correlation analysis, it was found that there was no correlation between the two variables, Gross domestic product per capita and Comprehensive air-quality index, because various factors such as topographical characteristics, hazardous substances, and local government’s efforts were not taken into account. As a result of sensitivity analysis, Ulsan had the highest sensitivity and variance for Gross domestic product per capita and Comprehensive air-quality index. As for the relative ratio of attractiveness between regions, Ulsan’s attractiveness was 2.95 times that of Daegu’s, indicating a large difference between regions.
Abstract
Recently, the relevance of the Air Quality Index considering major factors related to the air environment and the local economy and community was analyzed in abraod. In Korea, a comprehensive air-quality index has been proposed. In this study, the comprehensive air-quality index and the index that can integrate Gross Domestic Product per capita were summarized as regional attractiveness. As a result of the analysis, Ulsan, Chungnam, Seoul, Chungbuk, and Jeonnam had the highest Gross domestic product per capita, and Jeju, Gyeongnam, and Gyeongbuk had the best Comprehensive air-quality index, and Ulsan had the highest attractiveness. As a result of the correlation analysis, it was found that there was no correlation between the two variables, Gross domestic product per capita and Comprehensive air-quality index, because various factors such as topographical characteristics, hazardous substances, and local government’s efforts were not taken into account. As a result of sensitivity analysis, Ulsan had the highest sensitivity and variance for Gross domestic product per capita and Comprehensive air-quality index. As for the relative ratio of attractiveness between regions, Ulsan’s attractiveness was 2.95 times that of Daegu’s, indicating a large difference between regions.
참고문헌 (12)
- 안재섭, "도시재생의 지속가능성에 관한 연구", 경관과 지리, 21(3), pp.125~137 (2011), 한국사진지리학회[DOI]
- HO. M. G., "Development Air Environmental Index(AEI)Considered Health Effect", Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 22(1), pp.461~462 (2006)[DOI]
- Hwang. H. Y., "The Direction of the New Deal for Urban Regeneration", Korea Planning Association, 16(4), pp.2~3 (2019)[DOI]
- Jung, D. C, "The achievements and future challenges of the general agricultural and fishing village development project", The Korean Regional Development Association, pp.35~51 (2017)[DOI]
- 강동배, "기상 및 대기질이 건강취약집단에 미치는 영향", 한국환경과학회지, 29(7), pp.715~727 (2020), 한국환경과학회[DOI]
- Kim. U. G., "The Usefulness and Application of Air Quality Index Metropolitan Korea", Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 4(1), pp.136~137[DOI]
- Oh. Y. J., "The actual conditions and improvement tasks of vulnerable areas in rural areas due to reckless development", The 26th Rural Community Policy Forum, pp.3~12 (2020)
- Park, S. H., "Regional Impact Analysis of Basic Life SOC Construction in Rural Village Development Project", Master, pp.2021
- Sim, J. H., "The meaning of the times and development tasks of general agricultural and fishing village development projects", Korean Reginal Develoment Assoclation Seminar, pp.1~16 (2017)
- Son. J. S., "An Analysis of Comprehensive Air-Quality Index for Metropolitan Area in 2007", Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, 23(2), pp.371~372 (2007)[DOI]
- Milan Trifković, "The Attractiveness of Urban Complexes: Economic Aspect and Risks of Environmental Pollution", Sustainability, 13(14), pp.8098~ (2021), MDPI AG[DOI]
- 양원식, "농촌지역개발정책을 위한 새마을사업의 현대적 함의", 농촌계획, 22(2), pp.9~18 (2016), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]