본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관계절 부착 선호와 중의성 인식에 나타난 한국인 EFL 학습자들의 영어 중의적 관계절 해석 양상

The Interpretations of English Relative Clauses by Korean EFL Learners in Attachment Preference and Ambiguity Perception

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study investigated how Korean EFL learners interpret English relative clauses in two distinct tasks – an attachment preference task and an ambiguity perception task. The study also examined how different lexical-semantic factors such as preposition type (i.e., ‘of’ and ‘with’) and the animacy conditions of noun phrases (NPs) that might affect interpretations of English relative clauses. Thirty-one third grade middle school students participated in the experiment testing interpretations of ambiguous English relative clauses. A total of 28 test items were used to examine possible interpretations and indicate preferred interpretations of English relative clauses with different types of prepositions and animacy conditions. The overall results demonstrated the following: i) In the attachment preference task, Korean EFL students in middle school showed a preference toward high attachment (HA) interpretation for ambiguous English relative clauses. ii) On the other hand, in the ambiguity perception task, EFL students did not always realize that the relative clauses could be interpreted ambiguously. iii) As for lexical-semantic factors, relative clause interpretations were influenced by both preposition type and the animacy conditions of NPs, but only in preference attachment, not in ambiguity perception.

Abstract

This study investigated how Korean EFL learners interpret English relative clauses in two distinct tasks – an attachment preference task and an ambiguity perception task. The study also examined how different lexical-semantic factors such as preposition type (i.e., ‘of’ and ‘with’) and the animacy conditions of noun phrases (NPs) that might affect interpretations of English relative clauses. Thirty-one third grade middle school students participated in the experiment testing interpretations of ambiguous English relative clauses. A total of 28 test items were used to examine possible interpretations and indicate preferred interpretations of English relative clauses with different types of prepositions and animacy conditions. The overall results demonstrated the following: i) In the attachment preference task, Korean EFL students in middle school showed a preference toward high attachment (HA) interpretation for ambiguous English relative clauses. ii) On the other hand, in the ambiguity perception task, EFL students did not always realize that the relative clauses could be interpreted ambiguously. iii) As for lexical-semantic factors, relative clause interpretations were influenced by both preposition type and the animacy conditions of NPs, but only in preference attachment, not in ambiguity perception.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 모기룡, "한국인의 영어 문장 처리 전략 : 관계절 구문의 중의성 해소를 중심으로", 석사, 문화정보콘텐츠학, pp.2010
  2. 송예림, "한국인 영어학습자의 영어 관계절 부착 선호도", 석사, 영어영문학과 영어학전공, pp.2012
  3. Carreiras, M., "Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English", Language and Speech, 36(4), pp.353~372 (1993)
  4. Cuetos, F., "Cross-linguistic differences in parsing : Restrictions on the use of the late closure strategy in Spanish", Cognition, 30(1), pp.73~105 (1988)
  5. Dussias, P. E., "Syntactic ambiguity resolution in L2 learners : Some effects of bilinguality on L1 and L2 processing strategies", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, pp.529~557 (2003)
  6. Ehrlich, K., "Low attachment of relative clauses new data from Swedish", Poster presented at the 12th Conference on Human Sentence Processing (1999)
  7. Felser, C., "The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English", Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(3), pp.453~489 (2003)
  8. Fernández, E. M., "The development of second language grammars: A generative approach", pp.217~240 (1999), John Benjamins
  9. Fernández, E. M., "Bilingual sentence processing : Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish" (2003), John Benjamins
  10. Frazier, L., "Attention and performance", pp.559~586 (1987), Erlbaum
  11. Frazier, L., "Construal" (1996), MIT Press
  12. Frenck-Mestre, C., "Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50(1), pp.119~148 (1997)
  13. Gibson, E., "Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism", Cognition, 59(1), pp.23~59 (1996)
  14. Gilboy, E., "Argument structure and association preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs", Cognition, 54(2), pp.131~167 (1995)
  15. 한호, "Language Transfer in Parsing Relative Clauses", 영어학연구, 18(1), pp.1~15 (2012), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  16. Hemforth, B., "Sentence processing: A crosslinguistic perspective", pp.293~312 (1998), Academic Press
  17. Jun, S. A., "Default prosody and relative clause attachment in Japanese", Japanese-Korean Linguistics, 13, pp.41~53 (2008)
  18. Jung, T. -R., "The influence of L1 on processing relative clause attachment", master, pp.2010
  19. Kamide, Y., "Relative clause attachment : Nondeterminism in Japanese parsing", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(2), pp.247~254 (1997)
  20. 김지현, "L1 Transfer in L2 Relative Clause Attachment", 영어학연구, 16(3), pp.115~134 (2010), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  21. 권수옥, "Construal Theory and the Interpretation of Relative Clauses in English as a Second Language", 응용언어학, 19(1), pp.5~108 (2003), 한국응용언어학회
  22. 권수옥, "Lexical Sensitivity in Processing Syntactic Ambiguity by Korean Learners of English", 응용언어학, 31(4), pp.79~103 (2015), 한국응용언어학회
  23. 권수옥, "Processing Strategies of Relative Clause Attachment in Korean as a Second Language", 현대문법연구, (83), pp.95~119 (2015), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  24. 임남실, "Processing of Relative Clauses in Korean: High vs. Low Attachment", 언어, 37(3), pp.719~736 (2012), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  25. Maia, M., "Early and late preferences in relative clause attachment in Spanish and Portuguese", Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6(1), pp.227~250 (2007)
  26. Mitchell, D. C., "Comprehension processes in reading", pp.285~302 (1990), Erlbaum
  27. Papadopoulou, D., "Parsing strategies in L1 and L2 sentence processing : A study of relative clause attachment in Greek", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, pp.501~528 (2003)
  28. 박분주, "Sentence Processing of EFL Learners in English Relative Clause Attachment", 언어학, 18(2), pp.69~88 (2010), 대한언어학회[DOI]
  29. Quinn, D., "More evidence of implicit prosody in silent reading: French and Arabic relative clauses", Poster presented at the 13th Annual CUNY Conference (2000)
  30. Traxler, M. J., "Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), pp.558~592 (1998)
  31. Zagar, D., "Evidence for early closure attachment on first pass reading times in French", The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50(2), pp.421~438 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)