의원의 서사로 본 조선 후기 의료의 사회문화적 풍경
Medical Culture of Korea in the Late Chosŏn Period: Seen from the Narratives of Medical Practitioners
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Previous studies that explored the medical topography of the late Chosŏn dynasty have primarily focused on such subject matters as royal medical cares, central and local medical systems, familial pedigree of medical officers, knowledge and material exchange with China or Japan, and the medical cultures of Chosŏn Korea from the perspective of the ruling class Yangban elites. What these studies did not involve in their discussions are medical cultures seen from the perspective of medical practitioners, who were commonly recognized as lower than Yangban elites in terms of social status. So, this paper examines the socio-cultural landscape of medical care, life and practice in the late Chosŏn period, through the analysis of medical case histories (and narratives therein) composed by doctors. To this end, this paper primarily investigates medical case histories written in the late Chosŏn period: Rambling Essay on Tested Experiences 歷試漫筆 (1734), Efficacy-Proven Recipes by Yim Chŏng 小白經驗方 (1740), Miscellaneous Writing by Chang Taekyŏng 愚岑雜著 (1856), Efficacy-Proven Recipes by Ŭn Suryong 呑吐經驗方 (1858), and New Compilation as an Easy-to-Carry Treasure 輕寶新編 (c.19th century). Analyzing these historical sources, this paper does not just describe the fragmented aspects of clinical encounters, but also examines the cultural structures, as well as cognitive and sociological dimensions, within which medical practices took place, primarily drawing attention to the major issues revealed in the cognitive yet social processes. What is worth stating here is that the conventional dichotomous world view, such as the “tradition versus modern” narrative, should not be taken for granted. Doctors’ record of medical cases yields significant effects of documenting medical experiences, educating younger scholars, building personal reputations, making a living, and winning over competitors. On this count, doctors (as protagonists of the narratives of medical case histories, and experts in judging the disease patterns to be deficient 虛 or excessive 實) frequently emphasized medical expertise, rather than medical virtue, against the backdrop of the competitive medical markets, whilst pointing out the whimsy or discourtesy of their patients. In the doctor-patient relationship, the doctor's authority was basically situation-dependent and they were in an, as it were, precarious alliance with the patient side (patients and their family members). The patient side was not just in a passive position, but was rather an active actor to the extent that they selected doctors and discussed therapeutic strategies with them, and completed the patient’s story under the guidance of doctors about the patient’s experiences, to participate in the treatment procedure. Medical practice was also a social process in the sense that cultural clashes or negotiations were taking place between doctors, patients and other doctors in the social network of doctors and patients. Medical case histories, in which narratives were conspicuous, often presented diseases as life-threatening bodily episodes that occur under some contingent conditions. This is where ecological conditions, foods and drinks, human interactions and bodily injuries come in as disease-causing factors, and all of these also constitute both the body and the disease. Of these, emotion-induced disease (understood as a hybrid of the social, body and disease) stood out in the narrative of medical case histories. Considering medical tools, not least medicinals, employed in the late Chosŏn period, we can see that, unlike the case of modern people (who are accustomed to the urban life which is away from nature, and to the nicely packaged drugs which are produced in pharmaceutical factories), medical life of those days was much closer to the natural objects, such as nearby plants, animals and minerals, which were in fact part of their lives. All of these observations provide us with an opportunity to become aware of familiar cultural structures in an unfamiliar-looking landscape of the distant past, challenging the conventional description that has portrayed Chosŏn’s medical landscape only in terms of strange, outlandish, or incommensurable pre-modern aspects.
Abstract
Previous studies that explored the medical topography of the late Chosŏn dynasty have primarily focused on such subject matters as royal medical cares, central and local medical systems, familial pedigree of medical officers, knowledge and material exchange with China or Japan, and the medical cultures of Chosŏn Korea from the perspective of the ruling class Yangban elites. What these studies did not involve in their discussions are medical cultures seen from the perspective of medical practitioners, who were commonly recognized as lower than Yangban elites in terms of social status. So, this paper examines the socio-cultural landscape of medical care, life and practice in the late Chosŏn period, through the analysis of medical case histories (and narratives therein) composed by doctors. To this end, this paper primarily investigates medical case histories written in the late Chosŏn period: Rambling Essay on Tested Experiences 歷試漫筆 (1734), Efficacy-Proven Recipes by Yim Chŏng 小白經驗方 (1740), Miscellaneous Writing by Chang Taekyŏng 愚岑雜著 (1856), Efficacy-Proven Recipes by Ŭn Suryong 呑吐經驗方 (1858), and New Compilation as an Easy-to-Carry Treasure 輕寶新編 (c.19th century). Analyzing these historical sources, this paper does not just describe the fragmented aspects of clinical encounters, but also examines the cultural structures, as well as cognitive and sociological dimensions, within which medical practices took place, primarily drawing attention to the major issues revealed in the cognitive yet social processes. What is worth stating here is that the conventional dichotomous world view, such as the “tradition versus modern” narrative, should not be taken for granted. Doctors’ record of medical cases yields significant effects of documenting medical experiences, educating younger scholars, building personal reputations, making a living, and winning over competitors. On this count, doctors (as protagonists of the narratives of medical case histories, and experts in judging the disease patterns to be deficient 虛 or excessive 實) frequently emphasized medical expertise, rather than medical virtue, against the backdrop of the competitive medical markets, whilst pointing out the whimsy or discourtesy of their patients. In the doctor-patient relationship, the doctor's authority was basically situation-dependent and they were in an, as it were, precarious alliance with the patient side (patients and their family members). The patient side was not just in a passive position, but was rather an active actor to the extent that they selected doctors and discussed therapeutic strategies with them, and completed the patient’s story under the guidance of doctors about the patient’s experiences, to participate in the treatment procedure. Medical practice was also a social process in the sense that cultural clashes or negotiations were taking place between doctors, patients and other doctors in the social network of doctors and patients. Medical case histories, in which narratives were conspicuous, often presented diseases as life-threatening bodily episodes that occur under some contingent conditions. This is where ecological conditions, foods and drinks, human interactions and bodily injuries come in as disease-causing factors, and all of these also constitute both the body and the disease. Of these, emotion-induced disease (understood as a hybrid of the social, body and disease) stood out in the narrative of medical case histories. Considering medical tools, not least medicinals, employed in the late Chosŏn period, we can see that, unlike the case of modern people (who are accustomed to the urban life which is away from nature, and to the nicely packaged drugs which are produced in pharmaceutical factories), medical life of those days was much closer to the natural objects, such as nearby plants, animals and minerals, which were in fact part of their lives. All of these observations provide us with an opportunity to become aware of familiar cultural structures in an unfamiliar-looking landscape of the distant past, challenging the conventional description that has portrayed Chosŏn’s medical landscape only in terms of strange, outlandish, or incommensurable pre-modern aspects.
참고문헌 (61)
- 김정선, "조선시대 왕들의 질병치료를 통해 본 의학의 변천", 박사, 의사학, pp.2005
- 홍세영, "『承政院日記』의 臨床醫學 記錄 硏究", 민족문화, 33(33), pp.103~174 (2009), 한국고전번역원[DOI]
- 홍세영, "왕실의 議藥", 한국의사학회지, 23(1), pp.105~113 (2010), 한국의사학회
- 김호, "18세기 후반 居京 士族의 衛生과 醫療: 『欽英』을 중심으로", 서울학연구, 11 (1998)
- 신동원, "조선후기 의약생활의 변화: 선물경제에서 시장경제로-미암일기, 쇄미록, 이재난고, 흠영의 분석", 역사비평, (75), pp.344~391 (2006), 역사문제연구소
- 김성수, "18세기 후반 의학계의 변화상 -『欽英』으로 본 조선후기 의학 -", 한국문화, (65), pp.99~134 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 김성수, "16세기 향촌의료 실태와 사족의 대응", 한국사연구, 113 (2001)
- 김호, "16세기 지방의 의서 편찬과 患難相恤의 實踐知", 조선시대사학보, (89), pp.7~39 (2019), 조선시대사학회[DOI]
- 신동원, "조선의약생활사: 환자를 중심으로 본 의료 2000년" (2014), 들녘
- 김호, "조선시대 제주의 주변성과 의료", 한국학연구, (59), pp.451~483 (2020), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- 강명관, "조선의 뒷골목 풍경" (2003), 푸른역사
- 허경진, "조선의 중인들: 정조의 르네상스를 만든 건 사대부가 아니라 ‘중인’이었다" (2015), 알에이치코리아
- 김호, "조선의 명의들" (2007), 살림
- 김남일, "한의학에 미친 조선의 지식인들: 유의열전(儒醫列傳)" (2011), 들녘
- 김성수, "朝鮮時代 醫員의 변화와 自己意識 형성", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 17(2), pp.1~16 (2011), 한국한의학연구원
- 함정식, "조선통신사 사행원과 기록 연구 -18세기 사행록과 의학문답 기록을 중심으로-", 한국의사학회지, 20(1), pp.46~61 (2007), 한국의사학회
- 김호, "조선후기 통신사와 한일 의학교류: 필담록을 중심으로", 조선통신사연구, 6 (2008)
- 허경진, "조선 의원의 일본 사행과 의학필담집의 출판 양상", 의사학, 19(1), pp.137~156 (2010), 대한의사학회
- 김남일, "韓國醫學史에서의 醫案硏究의 必要性과 意義", 한국의사학회지, 18(2), pp.189~195 (2005), 한국의사학회
- 이기복, "18세기 의관 이수기(李壽祺)의 자기인식: 기술직 중인의 전문가의식을 중심으로", 의사학, 22(2), pp.483~528 (2013), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 이꽃메, "『역시만필(歷試漫筆)』의 사례로 재구성한 조선후기 여성의 삶과 질병", 의사학, 24(2), pp.497~532 (2015), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 이기복, "조선 후기 의학 지식 구성 및 실행 방식의 변화: 18세기 『역시만필(歷試漫筆)』을 중심으로", 한국과학사학회지, 41(1), pp.1~31 (2019), 한국과학사학회[DOI]
- C. Oh, "The Cold Damage Medicine in 17th and 18th Century Korea: Comparison through the Medical Records of China, Japan, and Korea", Historia Scientiarum, 24(1), pp.1~24 (2014)
- 김태우, "한의원의 인류학" (2021), 돌베개
- L. Ulrich, "A Midwife's Tale: the Life of Martha Ballard, Based on Her Diary, 1785-1812" (1999), Vintage Books
- J. Grant, "A Chinese Physician: Wang Ji and the ‘Stone Mountain medical case histories’" (2003), RoutledgeCurzon
- 신동원, "역시만필: 어의 이수귀의 동의보감 실전기" (2015), 들녘
- 박상영, "發掘 醫案 고려대학교 소장 『經驗方』에 대하여", 한국의사학회지, 28(1), pp.103~109 (2015), 한국의사학회
- 김하라, "고려대 소장 醫案 『經驗方』의 저자 小白累人의 신원과 생애 고증", 한문학논집(漢文學論集), 48, pp.233~260 (2017), 근역한문학회[DOI]
- 소백누인, "국역 상한경험방(傷寒經驗方)" (2016), 수퍼노바
- 홍세영, "『愚岑雜著』에 관한 一考", 호남학, 1(46), pp.277~323 (2009), 호남학연구원
- 이선아, "19세기 고창지방 의원 은수룡이 남긴 경험의안", 한국의사학회지, 18(2), pp.63~91 (2005), 한국의사학회
- 장태경, "(국역) 우잠만고ㆍ우잠잡저" (2010), 한국한의학연구원
- 구민석, "『輕寶新編』의 의안에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2017
- 전종욱, "조선 후기 醫案 『輕寶新編』 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 30(1), pp.185~209 (2017), 대한한의학원전학회[DOI]
- 구민석, "국역 경보신편(輕寶新篇)" (2017), 수퍼노바
- 신동원, "호환, 마마, 천연두: 병의 일상 개념사" (2013), 돌베개
- 안상우, "판소리 <수궁가> 醫學記事에 내포된 역사성과 조선후기 민중 의학지식의 보급 -김연수 창본 수궁가의 사설을 대상으로-", 호남학, (47), pp.127~158 (2010), 호남학연구원
- 오희문, "쇄미록 4", pp.478~479 (2018), 국립진주박물관
- 최흥원, "역중일기 5" (2021), 한국국학진흥원
- 최흥원, "역중일기 6", pp.258~ (2021), 한국국학진흥원
- "麻科會通", ~
- 노상추, "국역 노상추일기 2", pp.366~375 (2017), 국사편찬위원회
- C. Cullen, "Patients and Healers in Late Imperial China: Evidence from the Jinpingmei", History of Science, 31, pp.99~150 (1993)
- 김택룡, "조성당일기", pp.242~243 (2010), 한국문화진흥원
- 장태경, "우잠잡저, 世人之惑於巫覡之術", ~
- 은수룡, "呑吐經驗方, 古阜李友允景見害", ~
- "輕寶新篇", ~
- 싯다르타 무케르지, "의학의 법칙들: 생명의 최전선, 가장 인간적인 과학의 현장에서" (2017), 문학동네
- 권별, "죽소부군일기", pp.44~ (2012), 한국국학진흥원
- 권복규, "조선전기의 역병 유행에 관하여", 석사, 의사학, pp.1999
- "英祖實錄 권28", ~
- 노상추, "국역 노상추일기 1", pp.108~116 (2017), 국사편찬위원회
- "東醫寶鑑, 「雜病篇」 卷之七, 邪祟", ~
- H. Shapiro, "The Puzzle of Spermatorrhea in Republican China", Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique, 6(3), pp.551~596 (1998)
- S. Suh, "Naming the Local: Medicine, Language, and Identity in Korea since the Fifteenth Century", pp.137~162 (2017), Harvard University Asia Center
- 오준호, "조선 왕실의료문헌과 문집에 나타난 牛角灸法 연구", 대한한의학회지, 31(4), pp.38~48 (2010), 대한한의학회
- 황사우, "脫草譯註 在嶺南日記", pp.198~199 (2006), 영남문화연구원
- 은수룡, "呑吐經驗方, 治月湖金參奉風症", ~
- 신동원, "조선시대 지방의료의 성장 :관 주도에서 사족 주도로, 사족 주도에서 시장 주도로―강릉 약계(1603~1842)의 조직과 해소를 중심으로―", 한국사연구, (135), pp.1~30 (2006), 한국사연구회
- 김호, "16~17세기 조선의 지방 醫局 운영: 경북 영주의 濟民樓를 중심으로", 국학연구, (37), pp.391~434 (2018), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
