상황의미론의 존재론과 증거성의 해석: 한국어 ‘-더-’의 경우
Situation semantics and evidentiality: a case study from Korean -te-.
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper, as an extension of Lim (2014), proposes a (simplified) formal model of situations in situation semantics, which is assumed to be required in the interpretation of Korean direct evidential -te-. With this formal model, this paper provides a basic ontological definition of situations, and argues that situations can be ‘lumped’ into a bigger situation when there is a causal relation between them, and when an intended cause situation will continue to the naturally expected result situation (which is called efficacy condition, following Copley and Harley 2015). Based on this model, this paper further argues that -te- can be felicitously used only when the speaker directly perceives part of the causal chain between situations, or the entire causal chain, and shows that this proposal can explain various examples which are problematic in previous analyses, including -te- with the past tense -ess- which introduces direct evidentiality, and -te- without any overt tense which introduces inferential evidentiality (contra Chung 2007, a.o.).
Abstract
This paper, as an extension of Lim (2014), proposes a (simplified) formal model of situations in situation semantics, which is assumed to be required in the interpretation of Korean direct evidential -te-. With this formal model, this paper provides a basic ontological definition of situations, and argues that situations can be ‘lumped’ into a bigger situation when there is a causal relation between them, and when an intended cause situation will continue to the naturally expected result situation (which is called efficacy condition, following Copley and Harley 2015). Based on this model, this paper further argues that -te- can be felicitously used only when the speaker directly perceives part of the causal chain between situations, or the entire causal chain, and shows that this proposal can explain various examples which are problematic in previous analyses, including -te- with the past tense -ess- which introduces direct evidentiality, and -te- without any overt tense which introduces inferential evidentiality (contra Chung 2007, a.o.).
참고문헌 (36)
- 송재목, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미기능에 대하여", 국어학, 32, pp.135~169 (1998)
- 양정석, "주관적 판단의 문법" (2017), 한국문화사
- Aikhenvald, Alexandra, "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Arregui, Ana, "When aspect matters: the case of would-conditionals", Natural Language Semantics, 15(3), pp.221~264
- Barwise, Jon, "Situations and attitudes" (1983), MIT Press
- Kyung-Sook Chung, "The Syntactic Structure of Deictic Tense and anaphoric Tense in Korean", 언어학, 15(4), pp.97~121 (2007), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- Copley, Bridget, "Causation in Grammatical Structures", pp.120~151 (2015), Oxford University Press
- Davidson, Donald, "The Logic of Decision and Action" (1967), University of Pittsburgh Press
- Devlin, Keith, "Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7", pp.601~664 (2006), Elsevier
- Elbourne, Paul, "Situations and Individuals" (2005), MIT Press
- Elbourne, Paul, "Definite Descriptions" (2013), Oxford University Press
- Faller, Martina, "Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua", pp.2002
- Faller, Martina, "The deictic core of ‘non-experienced past’ in Cuzco Quechua", Journal of Semantics, 21, pp.45~85 (2004)
- Fine, Kit, "A companion to the philosophy of language", pp.556~577 (2017), John Wiley and Sons
- von Fintel, Kai, "Restrictions on Quantifier Domains", pp.1994
- Ginzburg, Jonathan, "Interrogative Investigations" (2000), CSLI Publications
- Hoe, Semoon, "The Korean evidential –te-, past tense –ess-, and the commitment of the speaker", Proceedings of the 26th Japanese, ~
- Higginbotham, James, "The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics", The Journal of Philosophy, 80, pp.100~127 (1983)
- Izvorski, Roumyana, "The Present perfect as an epistemic modal", Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 7, pp.222~239 (2007), Cornell University Press
- Kalsang, Jay Garfield, "Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan: evidence for a general theory of the semantics of evidential", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31, pp.517~561 (2013)
- Kanazawa, Makoto, "On the lumping semantics of counterfactuals", Journal of Semantics, 22, pp.129~151 (2005)
- Kratzer, Angelika, "An investigation of the lumps of thought", Linguistics and Philosophy, 12, pp.607~653 (1989)
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Constraining premise sets for counterfactuals", Journal of Semantics, 22, pp.153~158 (2005)
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Stanford encyclipedia of philosophy" (2017), CSLI
- Kwon, Iksoo, "Viewpoints in the Korean Verbal Complex", pp.2011
- Lee, Jungmee, "Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality", Natural Language Semantics, 21, pp.1~41 (2013)
- Lim, Dongsik, "Evidentials and Interrogatives", pp.2010
- 임동식, "On the Interaction between Lexical Aspects of Predicates and Evidentiality - A situation-semantics account -", 언어학, (70), pp.117~140 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Matthewson, Lisa, "Temporal evidentials without tense", Paper presented at “Expressing Evidence” (2019), University of Konstanz
- Murray, Sarah, "Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts", pp.2010
- Pustejovsky, James, "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
- Roberts, Craige, "Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated theory of pragmatics", Semantics and Pragmatics, 5(6), pp.1~69 (2012)
- Seligman, Jeremy, "Handbook of logic and language", pp.253~328 (2011), Elsevier
- Speas, Margaret, "Edges, Heads, and Projections", pp.127~150 (2010), John Benjamins
- Stojanovic, Isidora, "Identity, Language, and Mind: An introduction to the philosophy of John Perry" (2012), CSLI Publications
- Vendler, Zeno, "Linguistics in philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press