On the Interaction between Lexical Aspects of Predicates and Evidentiality - A situation-semantics account -
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The aim of this paper is twofold: to propose a novel analysis of Koreandirect perceptive evidential -te- based on the situation semantics (Barwise andPerry 1983), and to illustrate how this proposal actually works, focusing onthe cases where the lexical aspect of predicates and the semantics of -teinteract. To achieve these goals, first, I adopt and revise Kalsang et al.'s(2013) analysis of Tibetan direct perceptive evidentials, and propose that, for-te- to be felicitously used, the situation where the speaker acquires perceptiveevidence should be the same as, or be included by, the situation where theproposition is true. Next, I show that, with this proposal, we can account forsome instances of the interaction between the lexical aspect of predicates andthe semantics of -te-, including the case of the verb ip-, and the case whereaspectually different predicates under the same situation show differentbehaviors regarding -te- and other aspectual morphemes.
Abstract
The aim of this paper is twofold: to propose a novel analysis of Koreandirect perceptive evidential -te- based on the situation semantics (Barwise andPerry 1983), and to illustrate how this proposal actually works, focusing onthe cases where the lexical aspect of predicates and the semantics of -teinteract. To achieve these goals, first, I adopt and revise Kalsang et al.'s(2013) analysis of Tibetan direct perceptive evidentials, and propose that, for-te- to be felicitously used, the situation where the speaker acquires perceptiveevidence should be the same as, or be included by, the situation where theproposition is true. Next, I show that, with this proposal, we can account forsome instances of the interaction between the lexical aspect of predicates andthe semantics of -te-, including the case of the verb ip-, and the case whereaspectually different predicates under the same situation show differentbehaviors regarding -te- and other aspectual morphemes.
참고문헌 (19)
- Barwise, J, "Situations and Attitudes" (1983), CSLI Publications
- Chung, K.-S, "Space in Tense", 박사, pp.2005
- Chung, K.-S, "Spatial deictic tense and evidentials", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.187~219 (2007)
- Kalsang, J, "Direct evidentials, case, tense and aspect in Tibetan", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31, pp.517~561 (2013)
- 김윤신, "한국어 동사의 사건구조와 사건함수 '-고 있다'의 기능", 형태론, 6(1), pp.43~65 (2004), 형태론
- Kratzer, A, "More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses", Proceedings of the Semantics and Linguistic Theory, pp.92~110 (1998), Cornell University
- Kratzer, A, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2014)
- "Evidentials and modals: what makes them unique" (2012)[URL]
- Lee, J, "Evidentiality and Its Interaction with Tense", 박사, pp.2011
- Lee, J, "Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality", Natural Language Semantics, 21, pp.1~41 (2013)
- Lim, D, "Evidentials and Interrogatives", 박사, pp.2010
- 임동식, "A Note on Korean Evidential -te-: Inference from Direct Perceptive Evidence", Linguistics, 66(66), pp.51~71 (2013), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- Murray, S, "Evidentiality and the Structure of Speech Acts", 박사, pp.2011
- Nam, K, "A study on the tense in contemporary Korean", pp.55~57 (1972), Korean Language and Literature
- Park, J.-Y, "A study of modal endings in Korean" (2006), Taehaksa
- Pustejovsky, J, "The Generative Lexicon" (1995), MIT Press
- Speas, M, "Edges, Heads, and Projections", pp.127~150 (2010), John Benjamins
- Suh, T, "Kwuke Hwalyongemiuy Hyengtaywa Uymi (The Morphology and Semantics of Korean Inflectional Endings)", 박사, pp.1987
- Vendler, Z, "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University Press