의문문에서 나타나는 ‘-더-’의 시점 이동: 표준적인 지표어와 의문문의 의미론을 중심으로
The Perspective Shift of Korean Direct Perceptive Evidential -te- in Interrogatives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper addresses the so-called perspective shift of Korean direct perceptive evidential -te- in questions (Lim 2010, a.o.): the direct perceptive evidence implicated by -te- is interpreted from the speaker’s perspective in declaratives, and from the addressee’s perspective in interrogatives. To account for this, this paper argues that –te- is a function which takes a proposition as its argument and returns a character (Kaplan 1989), and this character again becomes a proposition in a context on behalf of declarative endings. By assuming this, as well as pointwise functional application (PFA: Heim and von Fintel 2001), it is shown that the perspective shift of –te- in interrogatives can be explained within the standard semantics of interrogatives (Hamblin 1973, a.o.) and of indexicals (Kaplan 1989, a.o.) After doing so, this paper briefly addresses Yang’s (2020) criticism on Lim (2010), which this paper is based on.
Abstract
This paper addresses the so-called perspective shift of Korean direct perceptive evidential -te- in questions (Lim 2010, a.o.): the direct perceptive evidence implicated by -te- is interpreted from the speaker’s perspective in declaratives, and from the addressee’s perspective in interrogatives. To account for this, this paper argues that –te- is a function which takes a proposition as its argument and returns a character (Kaplan 1989), and this character again becomes a proposition in a context on behalf of declarative endings. By assuming this, as well as pointwise functional application (PFA: Heim and von Fintel 2001), it is shown that the perspective shift of –te- in interrogatives can be explained within the standard semantics of interrogatives (Hamblin 1973, a.o.) and of indexicals (Kaplan 1989, a.o.) After doing so, this paper briefly addresses Yang’s (2020) criticism on Lim (2010), which this paper is based on.
참고문헌 (20)
- Chung, Kyung-Sook, "Spatial deictic tense and evidentials in Korean", Natural Language Semantics, 15, pp.187~219 (2007)
- von Fintel, Kai, "CIA leaks", Philosophical Review, 117, pp.77~98 (2008)
- von Fintel, Kai, "Intensional semantics: a lecture note" (2011), MIT
- Hamblin, Charles Leonard, "Questions in Montague English", Foundations of Language, 10, pp.41~53 (1973)
- Heim, Irene, "Class Notes for ‘Advanced Semantics’", ms, pp.2001
- Heim, Irene, "Semantics in Generative Grammar" (1998), Blackwell
- Hoe, Semoon, "Boundaries and Phases", pp.255~275 (2017), John Benjamins
- Kaplan, David, "Themes from Kaplan", pp.481~564 (1989), Oxford University Press
- Krawczyk, Elizabeth, "Inferred propositions and the expression of the evidence relation in natural language", Doctor, pp.2012
- Lee, Jungmee, "Temporal constraints on the meaning of evidentiality", Natural Language Semantics, 21, pp.1~41 (2013)
- Lim, Dongsik, "Evidentials and Interrogatives", Doctor, pp.2010
- 임동식, "A Note on Korean Evidential -te-: Inference from Direct Perceptive Evidence", 언어학, (66), pp.51~71 (2013), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 임동식, "영어 문장부사의 의문문에서의 의미 해석: 증거성을 도입하는 부사를 중심으로", 언어와 정보, 17(1), pp.33~52 (2013), 한국언어정보학회
- Lim, Dongsik, "Perspective shifts of Korean evidentials and the effect of contexts", Proceedings of SALT, 22, pp.26~42 (2012)
- 송재목, "안맺음씨끝 ‘-더-’의 의미기능에대하여: 유형론적 관점에서", 국어학, 32, pp.135~169 (1998)
- 송재목, "한국어 ‘증거성’ 종결어미 ‘-네’: 정경숙(2007, 2012)에 대한 대답", 언어, 39(4), pp.819~850 (2014), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Stephenson, Tamina, "Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal tastes", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, pp.487~525 (2007)
- Stojanovic, Isidora, "Talking about taste : disagreement, implicit arguments, and relative truth", Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, pp.691~706 (2007)
- Tonhauser, Judith, "Toward a taxonomy of projective content", Language, 89(1), pp.66~109 (2013)
- 양정석, "‘-더-’의 형식의미론적 기술들에 대한비판과 대안", 한국어 의미학, 69, pp.155~195 (2020), 한국어의미학회