한중 근대문학의 두 개의 진화론과 주체론 — 루쉰과 이광수의 경우
The Two Evolutionary Imaginations and Subjects of Modern Korean and Chinese Literature: In the Case of Lee Kwang-soo(李光洙) and Luxun(魯迅)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the modern ideas of Luxun and Lee Kwang-soo, the representative writers of modern Korean and Chinese literature, and to analyze the difference between the two people's evolutionary imaginations. After accepting the theory of evolution, Lee Kwang-soo and Luxun viewed humans and society according to the evolutionary perspective, and the ideas and literature of the two writers deeply permeated evolutionary imagination. There are many things in common in the evolutionary imagination of the two. In common, the two writers viewed humans and society according to biological perspectives, and evolution as basic principles of humans and society. However, Lee Kwang-soo dismantled cultural oppression and valued human emotions through human animal DNA in the perception that humans are animals. He aimed to create humans with emotions. Lee Kwang-soo thought that everyone's emotions were being suppressed, and that given an opportunity, everyone could turn into humans with emotions. It was because of his perception that the character in his novel “Mujeong (무정, 無情)” was drawn as a character familiar with change. Unlike Lee Kwang-soo, Lu Xun valued human cultural DNA. The bad cultural DNA of a particular nationality was considered to be transmitted to descendants due to cultural genetic diseases. Everyone thought they were suffering from genetic diseases because of the ideological and cultural inheritance inherited from their ancestors. In Luxun's view, the cultural disease of the Chinese is genetic, so it is not only a pre-modern Chinese disease, but also a modern Chinese disease. This is why the character in the Luxun novel “The Madman Diary (狂人日記)” appeared as a person who was wet with existing habitual perceptions and had no possibility of change. In order for Luxun to achieve the evolution of the nation in this state, it is important to change cultural DNA and to break off from the past culture that has been handed down from the past. This is why it is important for adults and older generations to disconnect from the past culture for the evolution of society. For Luxun, literature was the healing of the ideological and cultural genetic diseases of the Chinese.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the modern ideas of Luxun and Lee Kwang-soo, the representative writers of modern Korean and Chinese literature, and to analyze the difference between the two people's evolutionary imaginations. After accepting the theory of evolution, Lee Kwang-soo and Luxun viewed humans and society according to the evolutionary perspective, and the ideas and literature of the two writers deeply permeated evolutionary imagination. There are many things in common in the evolutionary imagination of the two. In common, the two writers viewed humans and society according to biological perspectives, and evolution as basic principles of humans and society. However, Lee Kwang-soo dismantled cultural oppression and valued human emotions through human animal DNA in the perception that humans are animals. He aimed to create humans with emotions. Lee Kwang-soo thought that everyone's emotions were being suppressed, and that given an opportunity, everyone could turn into humans with emotions. It was because of his perception that the character in his novel “Mujeong (무정, 無情)” was drawn as a character familiar with change. Unlike Lee Kwang-soo, Lu Xun valued human cultural DNA. The bad cultural DNA of a particular nationality was considered to be transmitted to descendants due to cultural genetic diseases. Everyone thought they were suffering from genetic diseases because of the ideological and cultural inheritance inherited from their ancestors. In Luxun's view, the cultural disease of the Chinese is genetic, so it is not only a pre-modern Chinese disease, but also a modern Chinese disease. This is why the character in the Luxun novel “The Madman Diary (狂人日記)” appeared as a person who was wet with existing habitual perceptions and had no possibility of change. In order for Luxun to achieve the evolution of the nation in this state, it is important to change cultural DNA and to break off from the past culture that has been handed down from the past. This is why it is important for adults and older generations to disconnect from the past culture for the evolution of society. For Luxun, literature was the healing of the ideological and cultural genetic diseases of the Chinese.
참고문헌 (29)
- 루쉰전집번역위원회, "루쉰전집 1" (2010), 그린비
- "이광수전집" (1968), 삼중당
- 루쉰, "광인일기" (2014), 문학동네
- 김윤식, "이광수와 그의 시대" (1986), 한길사
- 김윤식, "동양정신과의 감각적 만남" (1997), 고려대학교출판부
- 박헌호, "센티멘탈 이광수" (2013), 소명출판사
- 와다 토모미, "이광수 장편소설 연구" (2014), 예옥
- 이재선, "이광수 문학의 지적 편력" (2010), 서강대출판부
- 이주노, "루쉰의 광인일기, 식인과 광기" (2019), 21세기북스
- 하타노 세츠코, "무정을 읽는다" (2008), 소명출판
- Ernst Haeckel, "The Riddle of the University(e-book)" (1905), Harper &Brothers Publishers
- Leo Ou-fan Lee, "Voices from the Iron House" (1987), Indiana Univ. Press
- 김동식, "1910년대 이광수의 문학론과 한국근대문학의 비(非)민족주의적 기원들", 비평문학, (45), pp.233~279 (2012), 한국비평문학회
- 김현주, "1910년대 '개인', '민족'의 구성과 감정의 정치학", 현대문학의 연구, (22), pp.260~294 (2004), 한국문학연구학회
- 방민호, "『무정』 독해의 국면들과 무정ㆍ유정의 사상", 춘원연구학보, (10), pp.43~69 (2017), 춘원연구학회
- 서영채, "계몽의 불안: 루쉰과 이광수의 경우", 한국현대문학연구, (51), pp.109~142 (2017), 한국현대문학회[DOI]
- 오윤호, "근대 과학 지식의 재현과 진화론적 상상력 - 이광수의 『무정』을 중심으로", 한민족문화연구, 52(52), pp.277~308 (2015), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
- 유세종, "루쉰 『광인일기』 ‘절규’ 해석의 문제 - 원근법과 시각을 중심으로 -", 중국학연구, (49), pp.165~186 (2009), 중국학연구회
- 이보경, "중국적 근대성의 한 테제 “아이를 구하라” 再讀 ― 우생학적 기획으로 읽기", 중국현대문학, (35), pp.37~58 (2005), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 이욱연, "광인일기’ 해석의 몇 가지 문제", 중국현대문학, (10) (1996)
- 전형준, "김지하와 왕멍을 통한 「광인일기」 다시 읽기", 중국현대문학, (63), pp.93~117 (2012), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 歐陽軍喜, "以科學與理性的名義: 新文化運動中的海克爾其學說在中國的傳播", 學術硏究, (4) (2011)
- 金芳實, "中韓現代文學思想的雙子星座――魯迅李光洙的平行硏究", 博士, pp.2003
- 梁展, "魯迅外文藏書提要", 魯迅硏究月刊, 8 (2011)
- 劉婉明, "遺傳的鬼影: 勒龐學說與魯迅的身體書寫", 南昌大學學報(人文社會科學版), 52(3)
- 李冬木, "魯迅與丘淺次郞(上)", 東岳論叢, 33(4) (2012)
- 李明信, "魯迅與李光洙文學觀比較", 博士, pp.2010
- 孫堯天, "跨文化語境中的‘人的歷史’", 東岳論叢, 41(1) (2020)
- 嚴英旭, "日本和西歐對魯迅之影向", 魯迅硏究月刊, (5) (2003)
