본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Medical Ethics and the New Science of Moral Cognition

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

This article provides a brief overview of some of the recent developments in the new science of moral cognition and examines what relevance they might have for the field of medical ethics. Included here are descriptions of Mikhail and Hauser’s work on a universal moral grammar (UMG), Greene’s fMRI studies of emotional engagement in moral judgment, and Haidt’s crosscultural research on the psychological foundations of morality. It is argued that recent research results in these and other areas exposes a gap between medical ethics and common morality, between some of the methodologies and results of medical ethics on the one hand and the moral judgments and values of ordinary people on the other. This disconnect is explained, in part, in terms of a misunderstanding or misuse of the naturalistic fallacy, which serves to insulate medical ethics from advances in the scientific understanding of morality.

Abstract

This article provides a brief overview of some of the recent developments in the new science of moral cognition and examines what relevance they might have for the field of medical ethics. Included here are descriptions of Mikhail and Hauser’s work on a universal moral grammar (UMG), Greene’s fMRI studies of emotional engagement in moral judgment, and Haidt’s crosscultural research on the psychological foundations of morality. It is argued that recent research results in these and other areas exposes a gap between medical ethics and common morality, between some of the methodologies and results of medical ethics on the one hand and the moral judgments and values of ordinary people on the other. This disconnect is explained, in part, in terms of a misunderstanding or misuse of the naturalistic fallacy, which serves to insulate medical ethics from advances in the scientific understanding of morality.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Beauchamp T, "Principles of biomedical ethics" (2009), Oxford University Press
  2. Brock D, "Medical decisions at the end of life, in A companion to bioethics", pp.231~241 (1998), Blackwell
  3. Brody H, "Medical bioethics and cultural diversity", Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 64(3), pp.277~284 (1997)
  4. Buller T, "What can neuroscience contribute to ethics?", J Med Ethics, 32, pp.63~64 (2006)
  5. Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  6. "Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association. Decisions at the end of life", JAMA, 267, pp.2229~2233 (1992)
  7. [URL]
  8. Dennett DC, "Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meaning of life" (1996), Simon and Schuster
  9. Dickenson DL, "Are medical practitioners out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life", J Med Ethics, 26, pp.254~260 (2000)
  10. Gilligan, C., "In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development" (1982), Harvard UP
  11. Gillon R, "Ethics needs principles - four can encompass the rest - and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”", J Med Ethics, 29, pp.307~312 (2003)
  12. Graham J, "Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, pp.1029~1046 (2009)
  13. Greene JD, "An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment", Science, 293, pp.2105~2108 (2001)
  14. Haidt J, "Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology, in Moral Psychology", pp.181~217 (2008), MIT Press
  15. Haidt J, "Handbook of social psychology" (2010), Wiley
  16. Haidt J, "The happiness hypothesis: finding modern truth in ancient wisdom" (2008), Basic Books
  17. Haidt J, "The new synthesis in moral psychology", Science, 316, pp.998~1002 (2007)
  18. Hauser, M, "Moral minds: How nature designed our universal sense of right and wrong" (2006), HarperCollins
  19. Hume D, "A treatise of human nature" (1969), Penguin
  20. Koenigs M, "Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements", Nature, 446, pp.908~911 (2007)
  21. Kohlberg, L, "Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization, in Handbook of socialization theory and research", pp.347~480 (1969), Rand McNally
  22. Kuhse, H., "Response to Ronald M Perkin and David B Resnick: The agony of trying to match sanctity of life and patientcentred medical care", J Med Ethics, 28, pp.270~272 (2002)
  23. Marquis D, "Four versions of double effect", Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16(5), pp.515~544 (1991)
  24. Mendez MF, "An investigation of moral judgment in frontotemporal dementia", Cogn. Behav. Neurol, 18, pp.193~197 (2005)
  25. Mercier H, "Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory", Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2011)
  26. Mikhail, J, "Aspects of the theory of moral cognition: Investigating intuitive knowledge of the prohibition of intentional battery and the principle of double effect", ~ (2002)
  27. Mikhail, J, "Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, pp.143~152 (2007)
  28. Mullen E, "Exploring the psychological underpinnings of the moral mandate effect: motivated reasoning, group differentiation, or anger?", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), pp.629~643 (2006)
  29. Petrinovich L, "An empirical study of moral intuitions: toward an evolutionary ethics", Ethology and Sociobiology, 64, pp.467~478 (1993)
  30. Piaget J, "The moral judgment of the child" (1965), Free Press
  31. Quill TE, "The rule of double effect-A critique of its role in end-of-life decision making", N Engl J Med, 337, pp.1768~1771 (1997)
  32. Russell JA, "Sedation for the imminently dying: Survey results from the AAN Ethics Section", Neurology, 74(16), pp.1303~1309 (2010)
  33. S., "Culture and bioethics, in A companion to bioethics", pp.24~35 (2009), Blackwell
  34. Searle J, "How to derive “ought”from “is”", Philosophical Review, 73(1), pp.43~58 (1964)
  35. Shweder R A, "The “big three”of morality (autonomy, community, and divinity), and the “big three”explanations of suffering, in Morality and health", pp.119~169 (1997), Routledge
  36. Singer P, "How are we to live? Ethics in an age of self-interest. Prometheus" (1995)
  37. [URL]
  38. Singer P, "Practical Ethics" (1999), Cambridge UP
  39. [URL]
  40. Sulmasy DP, "The rule of double effect: clearing up the double talk", Arch Intern Med, 159, pp.545~550 (1999)
  41. Tassy S, "Current knowledge in moral cognition", J Med Ethics, 34, pp.679~682 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)