Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS2) and zirconium oxide (ZrO2) ceramics. Understanding the relevant physicochemical and mechanical properties of these ceramics will help identify the optimal material for facilitating gingival wound closure. Methods: Both biomaterials were prepared with 2 different surface treatments: raw and polished. Their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed by contact angle measurements, scanning white-light interferometry, and scanning electron microscopy. An organotypic culture was then performed using a chicken epithelium model to simulate peri-implant soft tissue. We measured the contact angle, hydrophobicity, and roughness of the materials as well as the tissue behavior at their surfaces (cell migration and cell adhesion). Results: The best cell migration was observed on ZrO2 ceramic. Cell adhesion was also drastically lower on the polished ZrO2 ceramic than on both the raw and polished LS2. Evaluating various surface topographies of LS2 showed that increasing surface roughness improved cell adhesion, leading to an increase of up to 13%. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that a biomaterial, here LS2, can be modified using simple surface changes in order to finely modulate soft tissue adhesion. Strong adhesion at the abutment associated with weak migration assists in gingival wound healing. On the same material, polishing can reduce cell adhesion without drastically modifying cell migration. A comparison of LS2 and ZrO2 ceramic showed that LS2 was more conducive to creating varying tissue reactions. Our results can help dental surgeons to choose, especially for esthetic implant abutments, the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications.
Abstract
Purpose: The increasing demand for esthetically pleasing results has contributed to the use of ceramics for dental implant abutments. The aim of this study was to compare the biological response of epithelial tissue cultivated on lithium disilicate (LS2) and zirconium oxide (ZrO2) ceramics. Understanding the relevant physicochemical and mechanical properties of these ceramics will help identify the optimal material for facilitating gingival wound closure. Methods: Both biomaterials were prepared with 2 different surface treatments: raw and polished. Their physicochemical characteristics were analyzed by contact angle measurements, scanning white-light interferometry, and scanning electron microscopy. An organotypic culture was then performed using a chicken epithelium model to simulate peri-implant soft tissue. We measured the contact angle, hydrophobicity, and roughness of the materials as well as the tissue behavior at their surfaces (cell migration and cell adhesion). Results: The best cell migration was observed on ZrO2 ceramic. Cell adhesion was also drastically lower on the polished ZrO2 ceramic than on both the raw and polished LS2. Evaluating various surface topographies of LS2 showed that increasing surface roughness improved cell adhesion, leading to an increase of up to 13%. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that a biomaterial, here LS2, can be modified using simple surface changes in order to finely modulate soft tissue adhesion. Strong adhesion at the abutment associated with weak migration assists in gingival wound healing. On the same material, polishing can reduce cell adhesion without drastically modifying cell migration. A comparison of LS2 and ZrO2 ceramic showed that LS2 was more conducive to creating varying tissue reactions. Our results can help dental surgeons to choose, especially for esthetic implant abutments, the most appropriate biomaterial as well as the most appropriate surface treatment to use in accordance with specific clinical dental applications.
참고문헌 (30)
- Valenti M, "Retrospective survival analysis of 261 lithium disilicate crowns in a private general practice", Quintessence Int, 40, pp.573~579 (2009)
- Gehrt M, "Clinical results of lithium-disilicate crowns after up to 9 years of service", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.275~284 (2013)
- Herrguth M, "The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD", CAM crowns, 2005, pp.32, 747~752
- Bengazi F, "Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.303~310 (1996)
- Bressan E, "Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.631~637 (2011)
- Ekfeldt A, "Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 22, pp.1308~1314 (2011)
- Grunder U, "Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 25, pp.113~119 (2005)
- Guess PC, "Monolithic CAD", CAM lithium disilicate versus veneered Y-TZP crowns: comparison of failure modes and reliability after fatigue, 2010, pp.23, 434~442
- Van Dooren E, "Mechanical, biological and clinical aspects of zirconia implants", Eur J Esthet Dent, 7, pp.396~417 (2012)
- Wittneben JG, "A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD", CAM single-tooth restorations, 2009, pp.22, 466~471
- Grundke K, "Liquid-fluid contact angle measurements on hydrophilic cellulosic materials", Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp, 116, pp.79~91 (1996)
- de Groot P, "Surface profiling by frequency-domain analysis of white light interferograms", Proc SPIE, 2248, pp.101~104 (1994)
- Rajaraman R, "A scanning electron microscope study of cell adhesion and spreading in vitro", Exp Cell Res, 88, pp.327~339 (1974)
- Duval JL, "Comparative assessment of cell", substratum static adhesion using an in vitro organ culture method and computerized analysis system, 1988, pp.9, 155~161
- Sigot-Luizard MF, "The cytocompatibility of compound polyester-protein surfaces using an in vitro technique", In Vitro Cell Dev Biol, 22, pp.234~240 (1986)
- Abramoff MD, "Image processing with ImageJ", Biophotonics Int, 11, pp.36~42 (2004)
- Josset Y, "In vitro reactions of human osteoblasts in culture with zirconia and alumina ceramics", J Biomed Mater Res, 47, pp.481~493 (1999)
- Covacci V, "In vitro evaluation of the mutagenic and carcinogenic power of high purity zirconia ceramic", Biomaterials, 20, pp.371~376 (1999)
- Warashina H, "Biological reaction to alumina, zirconia, titanium and polyethylene particles implanted onto murine calvaria", Biomaterials, 24, pp.3655~3661 (2003)
- van Brakel R, "Soft tissue response to zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo within-subject comparison", J Clin Periodontol, 39, pp.995~1001 (2012)
- De Sanctis M, "Soft tissue management around teeth and implants", J Parodontol Implantol Oral, 29, pp.245~269 (2010)
- Rimondini L, "Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.793~798 (2002)
- Brunot-Gohin C, "Soft tissue adhesion of polished versus glazed lithium disilicate ceramic for dental applications", Dent Mater, 29, pp.e205~e212 (2013)
- Müller C, "Initial bioadhesion on dental materials as a function of contact time, pH, surface wettability, and isoelectric point", Langmuir, 26, pp.4136~4141 (2010)
- Bolortuya G, "Effects of dentin surface modifications treated with Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on fibroblast cell adhesion", Photomed Laser Surg, 30, pp.63~70 (2012)
- Duval JL, "Organotypic culture to assess cell adhesion, growth and alignment of different organs on silk fibroin", J Tissue Eng Regen Med (2014)
- Messer RL, "In vitro cytotoxicity of traditional versus contemporary dental ceramics", J Prosthet Dent, 90, pp.452~458 (2003)
- Brackett MG, "In vitro cytotoxic response to lithium disilicate dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 24, pp.450~456 (2008)
- Scarano A, "Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study", J Periodontol, 75, pp.292~296 (2004)
- Rompen E, "Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: a pilot clinical study", J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp.S119~S125 (2007)