본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Acid etching of glass-infiltrated zirconia and its biological response

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of acid etching treatment on surface characteristics and biological response of glass-infiltrated zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A hundred zirconia specimens were divided into four groups depending on surface treatments: untreated zirconia (group Z); acid-etched zirconia (group ZE); glass-infiltrated zirconia (group ZG); and glass-infiltrated and acid-etched zirconia (group ZGE). Surface roughness, surface topography, surface morphology, and Vickers hardness of specimens were evaluated. For biological response test, MC3T3-E1 cell attachment and proliferation on surface of the specimens were examined. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. Group ZGE showed the highest surface roughness (Ra = 1.54 μm) compared with other groups (P < .05). Meanwhile, the hardness of group Z was significantly higher than those of other groups (P < .05). Cell attachment and cell proliferation were significantly higher in group ZGE (P < .05). CONCLUSION. We concluded that effective surface roughness on zirconia could be made by acid etching treatment after glass infiltration. This surface showed significantly enhanced osteoblast cell response.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of acid etching treatment on surface characteristics and biological response of glass-infiltrated zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A hundred zirconia specimens were divided into four groups depending on surface treatments: untreated zirconia (group Z); acid-etched zirconia (group ZE); glass-infiltrated zirconia (group ZG); and glass-infiltrated and acid-etched zirconia (group ZGE). Surface roughness, surface topography, surface morphology, and Vickers hardness of specimens were evaluated. For biological response test, MC3T3-E1 cell attachment and proliferation on surface of the specimens were examined. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS. Group ZGE showed the highest surface roughness (Ra = 1.54 μm) compared with other groups (P < .05). Meanwhile, the hardness of group Z was significantly higher than those of other groups (P < .05). Cell attachment and cell proliferation were significantly higher in group ZGE (P < .05). CONCLUSION. We concluded that effective surface roughness on zirconia could be made by acid etching treatment after glass infiltration. This surface showed significantly enhanced osteoblast cell response.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Kelly JR, "Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic:an overview", Dent Mater, 24, pp.289~298 (2008)
  2. Zarone F, "From porcelain-fused-to metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations", Dent Mater, 27, pp.83~96 (2011)
  3. Uo M, "Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics", Dent Mater, 19, pp.487~492 (2003)
  4. Yamashita D, "Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia", Dent Mater, 28, pp.461~470 (2009)
  5. Bächle M, "Behavior of CAL72 osteoblast-like cells cultured on zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies", Clin Oral Implants Res, 18, pp.53~59 (2007)
  6. Ewais OH, "Novel zirconia surface treatments for enhanced osseointegration: laboratory characterization", Int J Dent, 2014, pp.203940~ (2014)
  7. Schwartz Z, "Underlying mechanisms at the bonebiomaterial interface", J Cell Biochem, 56, pp.340~347 (1994)
  8. Krajewski A, "Albumin adhesion on some biological and non-biological glasses and connection with their Z-potentials", Biomaterials, 17, pp.53~60 (1996)
  9. Hench LL, "The story of Bioglass", J Mater Sci: Mater Med, 17, pp.967~978 (2006)
  10. Kristen A, "Bioactive and thermally compatible glass coating on zirconia dental implants", J Dent Res, 94, pp.297~303 (2015)
  11. Srikanth R, "Effects of cementation surface modifications on fracture resistance of zirconia", Dent Mater, 31, pp.435~442 (2015)
  12. Suresh S, "Graded materials for resistance to contact deformation and damage", Science, 292, pp.2447~2451 (2001)
  13. Iwaya Y, "Surface properties and biocompatibility of acid-etched titanium", Dent Mater, 27, pp.415~421 (2008)
  14. Thompson JY, "Adhesion", cementation to zirconia and other non-silicate ceramics: where are we now?, 2011, pp.27, 71~82
  15. Blatz MB, "Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.268~274 (2003)
  16. Canay S, "Effect of different acid treatments on a porcelain surface", J Oral Rehabil, 28, pp.95~101 (2001)
  17. Borges GA, "Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.479~488 (2003)
  18. Pisani-Proenca J, "Influence of ceramic surface conditioning and resin cements on microtensile bond strength to a glass ceramic", J Prosthet Dent, 96, pp.412~417 (2006)
  19. Sykaras N, "Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies:their effect on osseointegration. A literature review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.675~690 (2000)
  20. Bona A, "Characterization and surface treatment effects on topography of a glass-infiltrated alumina", zirconia-reinforced ceramic, 2007, pp.23, 769~775
  21. Flury S, "Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design", computer-aided manufacturing (CAD, Oper Dent, pp.2012, 37[DOI]
  22. Keshavarz M, "Mechanical properties of stabilized zirconia nanocrystalline EB-PVD coating evaluated by micro and nanoindentation", J Adv Ceram, 2, pp.333~340 (2013)
  23. Jamie JK, "Determining the toughness of ceramics from Vickers indentation using the crack-opening displacements:an experimental study", J Am Ceram Soc, 86, pp.1433~1436 (2003)
  24. Zhang Y, "Optimizaion of ceramic strength using elastic gradients", Acta Mater, 57, pp.2721~2729 (2009)
  25. Zhang Y, "Designing functionally graded materials with superior load bearing properties", Acta Biomater, 8, pp.1101~1108 (2012)
  26. Anselme K, "Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials", Biomaterials, 21, pp.667~681 (2000)
  27. Carlsson L, "Osseointegration of titanium implants", Acta Orthop Scand, 57, pp.285~289 (1986)
  28. Bowers KT, "Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.302~310 (1992)
  29. Teughels W, "Effect of material characteristics and", surface topography on biofilm development, 2006, pp.17, 68~81
  30. Abbasi Z, "Bioactive glasses in dentistry: a review", J Dent Biomater, 2, pp.1~9 (2015)
  31. Melchers S, "Effect of aluminum ion incorporation on the bioactivity and structure in mesoporous bioactive glasses", Chem Mater, 28, pp.3254~3264 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)