본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

내륙습지 기능의 우선순위 결정

Determining the priority order of wetland functions

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

In this study, the functional priority of wetlands was determined through analysis of previous research. To determine relative importance, three processes were performed. First, quantitative values from the case studies were normalized. Second, non-quantitative values were prioritized based on standard criteria. Third, equal weight was applied as long as there was no special consideration regarding a particular value’s disproportionate priority in the research. Finally, results were grouped into large, medium, and small classes.In this study, the functions of the medium class were found to be the most significant, in the following order of priority: water supply and ground water recharge; culture and recreation; biodiversity; product; water quality control; flood control; erosion control; moderation of climate change; and provision of biochemical matter. To verify these results, we compared our findings with those of an assessment that used the Rapid Assessment Method (RAM) on the same type of study area. Whereas this comparison indicated some correlations by the culture, water storage, and genetic sustainability functions, it suggested a lack of such relationship by the water purification and flood prevention functions.

Abstract

In this study, the functional priority of wetlands was determined through analysis of previous research. To determine relative importance, three processes were performed. First, quantitative values from the case studies were normalized. Second, non-quantitative values were prioritized based on standard criteria. Third, equal weight was applied as long as there was no special consideration regarding a particular value’s disproportionate priority in the research. Finally, results were grouped into large, medium, and small classes.In this study, the functions of the medium class were found to be the most significant, in the following order of priority: water supply and ground water recharge; culture and recreation; biodiversity; product; water quality control; flood control; erosion control; moderation of climate change; and provision of biochemical matter. To verify these results, we compared our findings with those of an assessment that used the Rapid Assessment Method (RAM) on the same type of study area. Whereas this comparison indicated some correlations by the culture, water storage, and genetic sustainability functions, it suggested a lack of such relationship by the water purification and flood prevention functions.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 우리나라 주요 습지의 경제적 가치 평가 연구, "강만옥", 한국환경정책·평가연구원, ~ (2008)
  2. 강수진, "습지기능을 고려한 한국 내륙습지의 간이 평가 기법 개발 및 적용", 석사, 환경학, pp.2004
  3. 구본학, "RAM(일반기능평가기법)을이용한 내륙 습지 기능 평가", 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 4(3), pp.38~48 (2001)
  4. 국가습지유형분류체계 연구, "구본학", 환경부 UNDP, 2008
  5. 김종호, "산림의 공익기능 평가", 한국산림휴양학회지, 10(2), pp.7~15 (2006)
  6. 4대강 생태습지조성모델 및 평가기법개발 연구, "김형수", 국토해양부, ~ (2009)
  7. 신한규, "댐습지의 기능 및 가치평가 연구(1) - HGM을 이용한 기능평가 : 보령댐을 대상으로 -", 한국습지학회지, 11(3), pp.115~132 (2009), 한국습지학회
  8. 오경두, "녹색성장을 위한 습지의 재조명", 물과 미래, 42(12), pp.10~30 (2009)
  9. 윤선하, "2009 하천변 습지의 기능 평가 연구", 대한토목학회 정기학술대회, pp.3431~3434 (2009), 대한토목학회
  10. 국가습지의 유형별·등급별 분류및 유형별 습지복원 매뉴얼 작성 연구, "이관규", 환경부, ~ (2010)
  11. 이상영, "제주초지의 사회.문화적 기능 가치평가 및 보전방안", 농촌계획, 13(4), pp.23~30 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
  12. 제1차 국가습지 인벤토리 구축사업, "전우송", 환경부 UNDP, 2007
  13. 제3차 전국내륙습지 조사지침 작성연구, "환경부", ~ (2011)
  14. Barbier, E. B., "Economic valuation of wetlands: A guide for policy makers and planners" (1997), Ramsar Convention Bureau
  15. Brinson, M. M., "A Guide for Application of Hydrogeomorphic Assessment to Riverine Wetlands", US Army Corps of Engineers, ~ (1995)
  16. Brouwer, R., "A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies", Regional Environmental Change, 1(1), pp.47~57 (1999)
  17. Costanza, R., "The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital", Nature, 387(15), pp.253~260 (1997)
  18. de Groot, R. S., "A typology for classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions goods and services", Ecological Economics, 41(3), pp.393~408 (2002)
  19. Ghermandi, A., "The Economic Value of Wetland Conservation and Creation: A Meta-Analysis", NOTA DI LAVORO, 79, pp.2008~ (2008)
  20. Hammitt, J. K., "Contingent valuation of a Taiwanese wetland", Environment and Development Economics, 6(2), pp.259~268 (2001)
  21. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, "Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment" (2005), Island Press
  22. Ramsar, "A global action plan for the wise use and management of peatlands-Recommendation of the Ramsar Convention on wetlands" (1971)
  23. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, "The Ramsar Convention Manual: a guide to the Convention on Wetlands" (2006), Ramsar Convention Secretariat
  24. Robert, M, "Wetlands Environmental Assessment Guideline", Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, ~ (1998)
  25. Sutula M. A., "A Practical Guide for the Development of a Wetland Assessment Method: the California Experience", Journal of the American Water Resources Association (2006)
  26. "A world in our backyard" (2012), United States Environmental Protection Agency
  27. A Wetland Protection Plan for the Lower One Subwatershed of the Rouge River, Rouge River National Wet Weather Demonstration Project, "Tilton, D. L", ~ (2001)
  28. Whigham, D. F., "Ecological issues related to wetland preservation, restoration, creation and assessment", The Science of the Total Environment, 240(1999), pp.31~40 (1999)
  29. Woodward R. T., "The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis", Ecological Economics, 37(2), pp.257~270 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)